- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Politico - Voters Were Right About the Economy. The Data Was Wrong.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:10 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:10 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Jeff Porcaro (not Nick Mason) on drums, BTW.
Some killer tunes with Steely Dan and Toto. RIP.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:14 am to OBReb6
don't give them too much credit. Politico is only trying to set the new narrative that the economy is weak and Trump is your president. They did not have any revelations
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:17 am to OBReb6
quote:
How Democrats were tricked into believing the economy was strong
That’s hilarious. It should read: How Democrats tried to trick voters into thinking the economy was strong.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:52 am to OBReb6
Anyone dumb enough to believe our economy was strong is too dumb to be functioning in our society
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:01 am to OBReb6
quote:
Politico - Voters Were Right About the Economy. The Data Was Wrong.
The small print:
“This misleading headline brought to you by you”
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:14 am to OBReb6
quote:
many Democrats were puzzled by the seeming disconnect between “economic reality” as reflected in various government statistics and the public’s perceptions of the economy on the ground.
various government statistics
quote:
What they rarely considered was whether something else might be responsible for the disconnect — whether, for instance, government statistics were fundamentally flawed. What if the numbers supporting the case for broad-based prosperity were themselves misrepresentations? What if, in fact, darker assessments of the economy were more authentically tethered to reality?
What if the numbers supporting the case for broad-based prosperity were themselves misrepresentations?
Because we don't know how to measure the economy, right? Just one of the basic functions.
One statistic can be explained as an outlier. The Biden's administration's push, w/ Politico and the rest of the MSM propagandized talking points were either A-incompetence or B-Malfeasance.
Regardless, the MSM ran with it. But the people knew.
I hope the MSM dies a horrible death - they've done it only to themselves.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:19 am to 4cubbies
If only we could go back to the govt robbing us and telling us men can be women. Are saying between the lines that is what you support?
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:24 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Musk was tricked into helping his son transition. Democrats were tricked into believing economy was strong. Looks like we have a bunch of bozos governing us.
Just a few days ago you were saying this board makes shite up when time and time again we were proven right.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:34 am to OBReb6
The economy was good for the very rich. It was terrible for the rest of us. One of the biggest lie Democrat leaders tell themselves is that they are trying to help regular people when they really just want to make their rich friends even richer.
This post was edited on 2/12/25 at 6:37 am
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:35 am to OBReb6
Crazy how nature do dat, when the fake news is just pushing propaganda to keep an illegitimate regime in power....
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:38 am to Froman
Yet you far left loons are still stupid enough to continue voting against yourselves 
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:48 am to OBReb6
Underemployed and unemployed so long they were dropped off the roster.
The people calculating the metrics did not account for these?
Why did they not know?
Regular people have been screaming about this for more than 15 years.
They knew. They chose to believe propaganda would keep working for them. They also knew the rosters counted illegals as well.
The people calculating the metrics did not account for these?
Why did they not know?
Regular people have been screaming about this for more than 15 years.
They knew. They chose to believe propaganda would keep working for them. They also knew the rosters counted illegals as well.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:55 am to OBReb6
quote:
Take, as a particularly egregious example, what is perhaps the most widely reported economic indicator: unemployment. Known to experts as the U-3, the number misleads in several ways. First, it counts as employed the millions of people who are unwillingly under-employed — that is, people who, for example, work only a few hours each week while searching for a full-time job. Second, it does not take into account many Americans who have been so discouraged that they are no longer trying to get a job. Finally, the prevailing statistic does not account for the meagerness of any individual’s income. Thus you could be homeless on the streets, making an intermittent income and functionally incapable of keeping your family fed, and the government would still count you as “employed.”
Everyone but a few hopeless cases here knew this.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 7:14 am to OBReb6
If you were reading the Money Board on this site you were repeatedly being told how great the economy really was.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 7:20 am to 4cubbies
quote:
4cubbies
you really are a special type of dumb aren't you? I'm being serious. You are the type that can see it all unraveling. Can know that your party was a part of some of the biggest coverups in US history....and yet you will support them hook line and sinker. Congrats on officially being brain washed.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 7:24 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Musk was tricked into helping his son transition. Democrats were tricked into believing economy was strong.
4fatties was tricked into fricking homeless dudes
Posted on 2/12/25 at 7:28 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
If you were reading the Money Board on this site you were repeatedly being told how great the economy really was.
It WAS great for the people on the Money Board. I made out like a bandit over the last four years. But I realize that an economy that leaves 30% or 40% of the people behind is a recipe for instability.
I think that the radical free traders are essentially correct. What is making their ideas untimely are two things:
1. Free trade exposes our lower classes to competition from the rest of the world. This is fine if the rest of the world are peers, but we are in an era of transitions from extremely poor countries to more wealthy countries. This transition is occurring BECAUSE we are exposing our lower class to competition. However, there is a near infinite supply of emerging countries, and thus a seemingly endless supply of cheap workers who are willing to work for wages that won’t lift an American family out of what we call poverty.
2. If the US does not engage in protectionism what we would have is not free trade but an asymmetric trade with nations that are tilting the playing field their way.
There is something that militates strongly in America’s favor. Our military strength and foreign aid have allowed us to poach the resources of much of the rest of the world. The benefits of this are manifest and great, but they tend to accrue to the wealthy and not the American laboring class.
Posted on 2/12/25 at 7:55 am to 4cubbies
quote:
4cubbies
quote:
democrats were tricked into believing economy was strong
I mean this is your party, and you are just a gullible and uninformed as the rest of em so own it
Posted on 2/12/25 at 8:17 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Yet you far left loons are still stupid enough to continue voting against yourselves
I can’t speak for the far left but they definitely do this.
Back to top


0










