- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Police Executive Order Invites Overfederalization
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:43 am
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:43 am
quote:LINK
Yesterday, President Trump signed three executive orders to focus federal resources on fighting drug cartels, increasing overall public safety, and preventing violence against law enforcement officers.
Perhaps the most worrisome of these is the directive to “pursue appropriate legislation…that will define new Federal crimes, and increase penalties for existing Federal crimes, in order to prevent violence against Federal, State, tribal, and local law enforcement officers.”
While law enforcement officer safety is important, there is no evidence that local or state officials have been reluctant to capture and punish those who commit violence against police. Moreover, there is little empirical evidence that more punitive sentences deter crime generally.
Put simply, the federal government has no business getting involved when local law enforcement is doing its job.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:45 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:like chicagistan....
Put simply, the federal government has no business getting involved when local law enforcement is doing its job.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:46 am to Big Scrub TX
After reading this article it seems like the question is: is this EO gonna make a difference?
IDK but doesn't sound like it's going to do much damage.
I wasn't very concerned by this EO.
IDK but doesn't sound like it's going to do much damage.
I wasn't very concerned by this EO.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:46 am to Big Scrub TX
Yeah. frick this shite.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:52 am to Big Scrub TX
Now Democrats are worried about overfederalization?
Wasn't it just last year that Democrats were clamoring for increased federal oversite of local LEOs? Hell, there were calls for federalizing of LE.
I heavily oppose federal involvement. People should remain consistent in their stances though.
Wasn't it just last year that Democrats were clamoring for increased federal oversite of local LEOs? Hell, there were calls for federalizing of LE.
I heavily oppose federal involvement. People should remain consistent in their stances though.
This post was edited on 2/10/17 at 11:56 am
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:53 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
the directive to “pursue appropriate legislation…that will define new Federal crimes, and increase penalties for existing Federal crimes, in order to prevent violence against Federal, State, tribal, and local law enforcement officers.”
Pursue Legislation
Legislation, by the legislature.
But muh Hitler....
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:54 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Overfederalization
They literally make you buy health insurance at gunpoint...
Lulz
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:54 am to Big Scrub TX
Eh. This seems like another EO that doesn't really "do" anything. It almost reads like an expression of the sentiments of the President or something.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:56 am to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
Put simply, the federal government has no business getting involved when local law enforcement is doing its job.
like chicagistan
Cops can't force people to act like civilized human beings..
Posted on 2/10/17 at 11:59 am to Scruffy
quote:
People should remain consistent in their stances though.
The only constant to the Left is inconsistency.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:02 pm to Big Scrub TX
I say go get the criminals. Regardless of whether it's local, state or federal government law enforcement.
Get the illegals and get the criminals and deport them and lock them up.
Get the illegals and get the criminals and deport them and lock them up.
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:06 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Yesterday, President Trump signed three executive orders to focus federal resources on fighting drug cartels
Already figured where he'll blow the money saved on f35s...
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:23 pm to Scruffy
I think that was more of an accountability issue. Not actually taking over. Rogue federal officers tend to stick out like a sore thumb. But rogue local officers not so much. Ever wonder why 2 officers approach similar conflicts completely different. Is it training or something else?
Posted on 2/10/17 at 12:26 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
. This seems like another EO that doesn't really "do" anything. It almost reads like an expression of the sentiments of the President or something.
Its just a declaration. Most of Trump’s EOs are just posturing
Posted on 2/10/17 at 5:23 pm to Scruffy
quote:Cato Institute is "democrats"?
Now Democrats are worried about overfederalization?
quote:Because certain LEO were identified as potentially violating federal civil rights (or other) statutes/provisions. The article explicitly highlights the fact that local prosecutors are having zero problem going after cop killers. Therefore, no feds required. Not hard to understand.
Wasn't it just last year that Democrats were clamoring for increased federal oversite of local LEOs?
Popular
Back to top
9






