- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:46 pm to accusatory_giblet
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:46 pm to accusatory_giblet
quote:
They act as is they no comprende English and force you to reword and reword and reword and reword until you yourself have garred up the explanation into something unrecognizable. Don't fall for it, if they can't understand simple Engish, let that be their problem.
Exactly.
And when the shoe is on the other foot and you ask them a question, they're all.."How dare you!"
Weird mindset they have.
Sad.
0
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:49 pm to texashorn
quote:
I didn’t at first but I have since wised up.
What, exactly "wised you up"?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:50 pm to Centinel
quote:
No, feelings. A person using reason and logic would look at the complete lack of any evidence of what Trump is accused of, how the House hearings were conducted, how the hearings were rushed, how the Judicial committee allowed zero factual witnesses, how the House did not vote to give a committee the power to subpoena, how the vote was rushed, how Pelosi held on to the Articles for over 30 days after said rush job, and come to the conclusion that this entire thing is utter bullshite.
Don't forget the whole bi-partisan part of it. When in fact it was bi-partisan in the opposite direction.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:51 pm to texashorn
quote:
If you don’t like that, you can shove it.
What's next? Are you going to call him a doo doo head?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:51 pm to Centinel
You believe that Trump did not hold up aid to Ukraine, predicated on investigating Democrats.
You believe that the subpoenas were evaded out of moral and legal superiority, and not because they had something to hide and protect.
That’s bueno, amigo.
You believe that the subpoenas were evaded out of moral and legal superiority, and not because they had something to hide and protect.
That’s bueno, amigo.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:51 pm to texashorn
quote:
I’ve said I think Trump is guilty of quid pro quo
Just of "quid pro quo"? Nothing beyond that?? Lol not even the Democrats asserted just quid pro quo to be an impeachable offense, so congrats on the hot take.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:52 pm to texashorn
quote:
You believe that Trump did not hold up aid to Ukraine, predicated on investigating Democrats.
You believe that the subpoenas were evaded out of moral and legal superiority, and not because they had something to hide and protect.
That’s bueno, amigo.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:52 pm to texashorn
quote:
I’m not beholden to beyond a shadow of a doubt,
Huh...seeing that you brought it up, what doubts do you have?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:52 pm to texashorn
quote:
You believe that Trump did not hold up aid to Ukraine, predicated on investigating Democrats.
You believe that the subpoenas were evaded out of moral and legal superiority, and not because they had something to hide and protect.
That’s bueno, amigo.
Oh dear.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:53 pm to Dale51
quote:
What, exactly "wised you up"?
When the defense became exclusively “it’s not an impeachable offense” instead of “the President is totally innocent.”
Are you always so damned daft?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:53 pm to texashorn
quote:
You followed up my criticism of your stupid questions with two more stupid questions.
You people!
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:54 pm to Dale51
quote:How dare you ask questions!
Huh...seeing that you brought it up, what doubts do you have?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:55 pm to texashorn
quote:
When the defense became exclusively “it’s not an impeachable offense” instead of “the President is totally innocent.” Are you always so damned daft?
It's not the defense's job to prove innocence. It's the prosecution's job to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That's how the law is supposed to work.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:55 pm to Jbird
His questions have already been answered, which is why I’m taking issue.
I think he has reading comprehension issues.
I think he has reading comprehension issues.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:55 pm to 225bred
Because we dont need Biden or Biden Jr. to testify in the impeachment trial. The house did an awful job writing the articles of impeachment. There is no real case for high crimes and misdemeanors. The case should be dismissed.
That is not to say that the Bidens dont need to be investigated. They should be. Any shady shite needs uncovering.
I am beginning to think that a lot of the donations to the DNC were kickbacks from taxpayer money sent to other countries as foreign aid. It is strange that when Trump stopped sending cash to other countries coincided with the DNC's coffers drying up.
The DNC is broke as shite.
That is not to say that the Bidens dont need to be investigated. They should be. Any shady shite needs uncovering.
I am beginning to think that a lot of the donations to the DNC were kickbacks from taxpayer money sent to other countries as foreign aid. It is strange that when Trump stopped sending cash to other countries coincided with the DNC's coffers drying up.
The DNC is broke as shite.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:55 pm to texashorn
quote:
You believe that Trump did not hold up aid to Ukraine, predicated on investigating Democrats.
There is no evidence of this. And the witnesses called and on the call verified this.
quote:
You believe that the subpoenas were evaded out of moral and legal superiority, and not because they had something to hide and protect.
They exercised their legal rights. The House could have gone to the judiciary to force the subpoena, but did not.
Those are the facts.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:56 pm to 225bred
Can't prove with hard evidence anything that John Bolton may say, it's still hearsay. Will draw out a forgone conclusion during the eve of an election. Let the people decide. Simple enough.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:56 pm to 225bred
Just like Kavanaugh. They do a crap job of putting a case together. Then they delay delay delay while they try to throw anything fake that might stick.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:57 pm to 225bred
Because the democrats want the Senate to do the House's job. If these witnesses were so crucial, why didn't the House call them to testify?
quote:
Just like Kavanaugh. They do a crap job of putting a case together. Then they delay delay delay while they try to throw anything fake that might stick.
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:57 pm to Centinel
quote:
Those are the facts.
Wonderful.
Page 8 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News