- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pima Co, Az Audit of public numbers... yes. They cheated.
Posted on 10/17/21 at 10:07 am to YankeeBama
Posted on 10/17/21 at 10:07 am to YankeeBama
quote:
Does anyone have the names of the two precincts that were over 100%?
Does anyone have a link to where Dr. Shiva got his mail in turnout numbers?
2
Posted on 10/17/21 at 4:25 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
Does anyone have a link to where Dr. Shiva got his mail in turnout numbers?
Asking again for the night crew.
Posted on 10/17/21 at 5:07 pm to YankeeBama
It's interesting because pima county actually had additional bipartisan oversight invited in to review their election.
So they're extra confident he's wrong.
So they're extra confident he's wrong.
Posted on 10/17/21 at 5:09 pm to m57
quote:
And yet Fox News knew to call Arizona with like 3% of precincts reporting….
How can you possibly think that someone would call the vote for a state in a presidential election with only 3% of the votes counted?
Over 80% of the vote was in when Fox called Arizona.
Posted on 10/17/21 at 5:16 pm to Jjdoc
I will go to my grave believing enough invalid votes made the difference in this election....
Problem is how to prove it, without a doubt!
At a minimum, maybe we are making a large enough difference in the voting laws, procedures, etc!
Gotta keep pounding away!
Problem is how to prove it, without a doubt!
At a minimum, maybe we are making a large enough difference in the voting laws, procedures, etc!
Gotta keep pounding away!
Posted on 10/17/21 at 5:21 pm to Jjdoc
Give the American Marxists credit, they understood the pandemic was an opportunity for a mass mail in ballot harvesting scam and it worked. What sucks is R’s were controlling the legislatures in AZ, GA, PA, and maybe WI…. The spineless Rinos allowed the ballot harvesting to take place.
Posted on 10/17/21 at 8:26 pm to oldskule
quote:
Problem is how to prove it, without a doubt!
Well so the easiest way I'd to pick s single claim and drill in.
You need specifics instead of innuendo. So like this claim for example. We would want to know how Dr. Shiva came to this conclusion and how do we reproduce the results. Then once we know we can evaluate whether those are the proper sources to produce that conclusion and can evaluate if we can reproduce
Posted on 10/27/21 at 6:24 pm to wayak
quote:Why do you keep repeating this lie?
And so 64 times Trump went to court, and 64 times he's failed.
Is it because you support the theft of the 2020 US Presidential Election AND OTHER RACES?
Posted on 10/27/21 at 6:29 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Do you guys not read these links?
Not sure about that but I’m I damned sure not reading your word salad hack nonsense!
This post was edited on 10/27/21 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 10/27/21 at 7:14 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
Does anyone have a link to where Dr. Shiva got his mail in turnout numbers?
Asking again for Yankee.
Been a minute surely we've got the data out there and nailed those cheaters to the wall by this time. Since this was so cut and dry.....
Posted on 10/27/21 at 7:38 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
This is simply a case of him not knowing what he's talking about most likely
Quite the compelling argument right there. I bet you voted for a certain guy that claimed to have invented the internet.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 8:11 pm to Jjdoc
Can someone link the actual analysis and data set?
I'm curious to explore it because I'm fairly skeptical.
I'm curious to explore it because I'm fairly skeptical.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 10:08 pm to GMON
quote:
Can someone link the actual analysis and data set?
Not that I've seen. I even looked myself.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 10:31 pm to GMON
not data set but compiled fraud sourcing
and especially what I was asked regarding the lies of 64/64 court cases
Here is the evidence
and especially what I was asked regarding the lies of 64/64 court cases
Here is the evidence
Posted on 10/27/21 at 10:36 pm to texridder
quote:
ow can you possibly think that someone would call the vote for a state in a presidential election with only 3% of the votes counted?
Why "call it" at all. How about shut the frick up and f'ing report the results. Especially when vote totals can turn backwards.
News media has no f'ing authority to determine election results.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 10:38 pm to omegaman66
quote:
News media has no f'ing authority to determine election results.
Right and their calling it didn't matter to the election at all. I'm not sure what the problem is?
Posted on 10/27/21 at 11:29 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Eurocat
You need to stay in your lane and worry about your own shithole “Eurocratic” communist country.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 11:31 pm to GMON
quote:
Can someone link the actual analysis and data set?
I'm curious to explore it because I'm fairly skeptical.
With your head so far up your arse you wouldn’t know wtf you were looking at.
Now, fetch me a medium medium roast.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 11:34 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
He's a known fraudster and liar about do many things.
People make mistakes but that is insignificant a lot of times. Just about as many people, if not more, commit fraud. Whether it be $2 or $2M. I'm not sure if I believe you're this naive. Nobody is asking you to believe anything, but question inconsistencies that most certainly exist.
Posted on 10/27/21 at 11:38 pm to Eurocat
quote:Ayyadurai also claimed that in a video about the Mighigan election.
I did find that in Maricopa county he tried to claim the same thing.
Ayyadurai posted a video of scatterplot graph of the Michigan vote, where he claimed the downward negative slope of the scatterplot trendline showed that votes had been switched from Trump to Biden.
After the first video was posted, Ayyadurai received criticism about his conclusion, and some embarrassing math errors. He then came out with a second video where he tried to deflect the criticism of his math on the first video.
On the second video, Ayyadurai dismissed the math-based criticisms by saying that detecting election-fraud is “not a math problem, but a pattern-recognition problem.”
Also, in the second video Ayyadurai contradicted what he had said in the first video. He showed a scatterplot that had a curved trendline and claimed that showed there was evidence of voter fraud-- and not the straight negative sloping treadline that he had claimed in his first video.
It is pitiful that Trump and the Republican Senate are relying on this quack to promote an audit of the Pima County vote.
This post was edited on 10/28/21 at 10:28 am
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News