Started By
Message

re: Perfect example of Venuseula election fraud/interference - RE: Cobb Co GA

Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:25 am to
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42887 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:25 am to
The biggest lies and frauds are committed out in the open, where those responsible dare and gaslight anyone to try and do something about it.

Most cower and do nothing.

The reaction to covid was a planned over reach of power.

The BLIM riots should have been met with overwhelming violence to put them down. People did nothing. (And when they did, they got accused of murder when they were just defending themselves - see Kyle )

The 2020 election was overtly stolen, in plain sight, just as we were told by high - tech execs. Many people knew the plan was to flood the ballot boxes with necessary ballots in the middle of the count to ensure Trump wouldn't win.

That's just a a fact. Was then. Is now. We just know more.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 8:27 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Fraud is not found in recounts.


Then what is the point of this 2022 example and why are you or the guy in OP giving it any referential validity to 2020?

Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48158 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

The exact same safeguards were used in 2020.

What safeguards in 2020 looked at drop box ballots??

Among other things - the "early voting" and "drop boxes" and "ballot harvesting" were unique to the 2020 election - and there has never been a real investigation into all the bullwhip that went with those factors.

Cars driving up dumping dozens of ballots into the boxes in the middle of the night - taking a photo of the process (presumably so they can get paid).

Are you really asserting that those ballots were given the proper attention as to authenticity to the extent that they are above being questioned about the process?

You are not that dumb - but you are that dishonest.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:

What safeguards in 2020 looked at drop box ballots??


You want to have a completely different discussion than the one relating to the 2022 election, I see.

quote:

Among other things - the "early voting" and "drop boxes" and "ballot harvesting" were unique to the 2020 election - and there has never been a real investigation into all the bullwhip that went with those factors.

Cars driving up dumping dozens of ballots into the boxes in the middle of the night - taking a photo of the process (presumably so they can get paid).


Multiple different conversations than ones relating to the discussion about 2022 and how it complares to 2020, I see.

quote:

Are you really asserting that those ballots were given the proper attention as to authenticity to the extent that they are above being questioned about the process?

I'm having a completely different discussion than the one you're trying to derail this thread into having.

It's a common pattern with this 2022 election example, especially when I show how it validates Biden's victory in 2020 more than critiques it or raises questions about it.

You don't realize this, but you're agreeing with me and proving my point, and pivoting to those non-relevant discussions shows this. You are doing everything you can to avoid having the relevant discussion by trying to divert and pivot to completely different discussions entiresly.
Posted by honeybadger07
The Woodlands
Member since Jul 2015
3972 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:30 am to
And the hand count confirmed the voting machines did not properly tally all of the votes. Two things can be true…the end result is the same while the voting machine tallies were also fricked up.


Are you really this fricking stupid?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:48 am to
quote:

And the hand count confirmed the voting machines did not properly tally all of the votes.


Sure. That's why we have safeguards in place.

In 2020 the hand counts confirmed the results that Biden won. So if the argument is that hand counts are legitimate, then that argument should apply to 2020.

quote:

Two things can be true…the end result is the same while the voting machine tallies were also fricked up.

Nobody is arguing that machine counts can neve be wrong. That's why we have safeguards.

As you put, there are 2 phases. The initial machine count and hand recounts.

People are trying to use the 2022 example to argue "machines are wrong" while ignoring the hand count safeguard in 2020. They're using both phases in 2022 but trying to only apply that scenario to the initial/machine vote in 2020. Pure dishonesty.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
107276 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

You are not that dumb - but you are that dishonest.


As a “lawyer” he’s encouraged to be as dishonest as necessary to win his argument. The truth is fluid to him.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
2919 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

there is now hard proof facts that Venuseula is doing this through the voting machines manipulating every single election in our country.


There was hearing testimony (2002 I believe) and admission that computerized voting machines could easily be manipulated.

All of Europe, Canada, Australia AND the US can now be said to have rigged elections across the board from state/province to Presidents, Prime Ministers, Governorships, Parliaments and Senates.

In not one single case is there ever any "do over" or heads rolling. "'Election integrity' has been dead a looong time, Jim."
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:06 am to
quote:

As a “lawyer” he’s encouraged to be as dishonest as necessary to win his argument. The truth is fluid to him.


Naw

I'm specifically showing the dishonesty in the opposing position

See post above your's
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2244 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:18 am to
quote:

But that beeyotch list.
Once could have been a typo. Twice, maybe. But THREE straight times.

Is this supposed to be cute or something?
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19346 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:22 am to
quote:

That's why we have safeguards to verify possible issues.


Where did the extra millions of Dem voters come from in the 2020 elections and where did they go in the 2024 election.

Hiding your head in the sand doesn’t fix the issues. If you believe Biden got more votes than Obama you are truly hopelessly mentally ill.
Posted by Bourbon Bebe
Member since Oct 2023
146 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:25 am to
The machines ARE garbage. The software is proprietary, so even election officials cannot look at it. Why would we want a private company counting our votes? What is proprietary about a counting machine? In Louisiana, how do we know that the tapes printed out at the end of the night are accurate? There is evidence that they are not. ALL machines can be hacked or manipulated!

The hacker mentioned at the beginning, Clay Parikh, hacked into Louisiana SOS Kyle Ardoin's computer system in less than 3 minutes. It's one of the reasons why he did not run again.

Hand-marked, hand counted serialized, watermarked, secure paper ballots counted at the precincts with watchers and cameras is the only way forward.


Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
12399 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:28 am to
quote:

And the hand count confirmed the voting machines did not properly tally all of the votes. Two things can be true…the end result is the same while the voting machine tallies were also fricked up.


He fought this windmill last week and tried to obfuscate the conversation then with the same pathetic arguments. It failed then, and it’s failing now.

I find it fascinating to see which threads he will dive into to defend liberalism and the status quo, and which threads he refuses to enter.

Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2244 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Perfect example of Venuseula election fraud/interference
Thread title sets the intellectual tone.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Where did the extra millions of Dem voters come from in the 2020 elections and where did they go in the 2024 election.


Kamala Harris got more votes than Joe Biden did in GA

DEMs had low turnout and lost most of those votes in pro-DEM areas, not the swing states. The swing state had similar/more votes in 2024.
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 10:31 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:32 am to
quote:

He fought this windmill last week and tried to obfuscate the conversation then with the same pathetic arguments.

You have a weird definition of "obfuscate"

If the recount cured the 2022 voting issues, why didn't it cure any perceived issues in 2020?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2244 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:42 am to
quote:

He fought this windmill last week and tried to obfuscate the conversation then with the same pathetic arguments.
quote:

You have a weird definition of "obfuscate"

Some words have situational definitions.

Here, "obfuscate" means "any discussion that fails to fit the prevailing narrative."
This post was edited on 12/28/25 at 10:43 am
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
19660 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Venuseula is doing this through the voting machines manipulating every single election in our country.

I don’t know about all this voting machine stuff? I do know the voting rules were changed in 2020 to allow for mass mail in ballots. Covid was used as an excuse for states to avoid going through their legislative branches for election rule changes. Things go back to normal in 2024 with election rules and look who wins, lol. Trump losing in 2020 and coming back to win 2024 makes no sense. He won in 2020 with the same 2024 rules.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467076 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Covid was used as an excuse for states to avoid going through their legislative branches for election rule changes. Things go back to normal in 2024 with election rules and look who wins, lol. Trump losing in 2020 and coming back to win 2024 makes no sense.


a. It does make sense when you realize the country was tired of Biden and the DEMs, and picking Kamala was a white flag.

b. Regardless, 2024 had similar/more turnout in the purple battleground states. Like I said above, Kamala got more votes in GA than Biden did, with all the law changes, scrutiny, lawsuits, etc. of 2024 reigning in fraud (compared to 2020 at least). How did THAT happen?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297576 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:


I find it fascinating to see which threads he will dive into to defend liberalism


This is so stupid. Trump has successfully destroyed the lines between left and right.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram