5
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
People voting illegally is election interference? Why should the FBI be kept out of it?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:50 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:50 am
Why are the democratic senators so up in arms about preventing election interference, especially with so many communists and marxist running for office as a democrat?
Certainly Law Enforcement Can Prevent Election Interference
quote:
Blumenthal said he was "dissatisfied that you are unable to give us an unequivocal, clear, unambiguous commitment that the FBI will be kept out of election interference."
Certainly Law Enforcement Can Prevent Election Interference
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:54 am to Timeoday
It looks like we are getting into a definition debate.
What is "election interference".
Ballot harvesting from people who don't speak English and never asked for one and then "assisting" them in filling it out?
Or, foreigners posting memes?
Or, anything in between?
What is "election interference".
Ballot harvesting from people who don't speak English and never asked for one and then "assisting" them in filling it out?
Or, foreigners posting memes?
Or, anything in between?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:02 am to Timeoday
Why should the US Postal Service handle election ballots and then not be able to investigate postal fraud of those same election ballots. If the postal service does not have authority over investigation of its services then they should not participate in those services.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:06 am to fwtex
quote:
Why should the US Postal Service handle election ballots and then not be able to investigate postal fraud of those same election ballots. If the postal service does not have authority over investigation of its services then they should not participate in those services.
It looks like when dust finally settles on the court cases SCOTUS will agree that the USPS has authority to make it's rules on how it handles ballots.
We just won't get that ruling in time for these mid terms.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:08 am to TrueTiger
Maybe the USPS goes on strike during the election season!!
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:08 am to Timeoday
Voting on behalf of other people who are citizens (stealing their votes).
Voting by people who are not citizens or are otherwise ineligible to vote.
Voting on behalf of people who are not citizens or are otherwise ineligible.
People voting multiple times in different jurisdictions because they either didn’t update their registration or the states didn’t remove it.
Breaking chain of custody so that targeted batches of filled out ballots are never counted as cast (throwing away mail in ballots).
Breaking chain of custody so that mail in ballots are intercepted before they can be filled out and are instead filled out by third parties on the voter’s behalf.
Manufacturing votes on behalf of people who do not exist by creating fake voter registrations in rolls.
Hacking of digital election infrastructure to manipulate displayed vote totals or change votes after they have been cast.
Violating campaign finance laws by laundering international money through fictitious small donors to bankroll candidates that otherwise would be barred from accepting that money.
Voting by people who are not citizens or are otherwise ineligible to vote.
Voting on behalf of people who are not citizens or are otherwise ineligible.
People voting multiple times in different jurisdictions because they either didn’t update their registration or the states didn’t remove it.
Breaking chain of custody so that targeted batches of filled out ballots are never counted as cast (throwing away mail in ballots).
Breaking chain of custody so that mail in ballots are intercepted before they can be filled out and are instead filled out by third parties on the voter’s behalf.
Manufacturing votes on behalf of people who do not exist by creating fake voter registrations in rolls.
Hacking of digital election infrastructure to manipulate displayed vote totals or change votes after they have been cast.
Violating campaign finance laws by laundering international money through fictitious small donors to bankroll candidates that otherwise would be barred from accepting that money.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 10:13 am
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:11 am to Timeoday
Election integrity is only an issue when Democrats don't win. If an investigation might harm Democrat chances by uncovering enough fraud to swing an election from their candidate, then it's "election interference".
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:48 am to Timeoday
Every bogus ballot cast nullifies and waters down a corresponding vote from a legal ballot cast by a real, American citizen.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:18 am to VoxDawg
Yes it does and also causes the concern to manifest regarding my vote does not count.
I remember recently an election that was won by 1 vote. I know several who would have altered that election if they had voted. However, I will not vote for a woman ever!
I remember recently an election that was won by 1 vote. I know several who would have altered that election if they had voted. However, I will not vote for a woman ever!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News