re: People Basically Approving of the Murder of the United Healthcare CEO

They paid for the roof 2 years after denying because I threatened to sue. I guarantee you most people give up. My next door neighbor had their claim handled immediately by the same company.

But yea they handled my contract within the terms. I was fortunate to have the time and resources to fight along with a good friend in the insurance industry that told me how to pursue and ultimately an insider that got assigned to my claim gave me information that I should not have had. She saw what they were doing and knew I was right. They established an install date on my house that was the date the house built denying all the evidence showing them from 3rd parties they had made an “error”.

My wife could not get any form of treatment covered because insurance denied everything. Doctor got pissed and stayed on it. Eventually his persistence got it covered. Sure we could have gone out of pocket but that’s not the fricking point. I had already gone out of pocket with the premiums. A specialist recommended a course of treatment they that denied instantly.

You seem to argue that it is appropriate and within the terms of the contract for insurance to deny claims because they have been subjected to fraud. Show there is fraud then deny.

But yea tell me how they handled my claims appropriately.

I never advocated for government involvement. Just that people in the thread were calling people abhorrent because they don’t give a shite that some CEO of a company with a strong record of taking advantage of people got killed. I wouldn’t go that route but the a-hole oversaw a company that likely cost people their lives and not going to shed a tear.