- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelosi and Tariffs in 1996
Posted on 4/3/25 at 7:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/3/25 at 7:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And has MAGA officially adopted Democrat economic positions with this thread?
1990s democrat policy led to a great economy and budget surplus.
I wish todays Dems were the Dems of 1990s
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:14 pm to Jbird
quote:
AOC will never be as smart as Nancy
But age adjusted they probably had similar titties. And as far as her tariff position, I’d like to see her net worth in 1996 vs 2025, and wonder how much Chinese cash helped her grow it.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your point?
That morons here are enabling the enemy.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:24 pm to deltaland
quote:
1990s democrat policy led to a great economy
The tech boom drove the economy. We became wealthy as a nation as a result of being at the forefront of that industry.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:25 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
young Pelosi could get it
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We offshore what isn't efficient to produce here
This is incorrect concerning a shite ton as it relates to China. By all means though, keep repeating your stupidity while ignoring reality.
This post was edited on 4/3/25 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:27 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
We offshore what isn't efficient to produce here
This is incorrect
Wrong. Its 100% correct.
Inefficiencies are a drag on the economy.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:28 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
To see that liver spotted sea hag as a young woman, I figured the video would be in black and white.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sell us on the lower standard of living
So Americans working and not living off the government equates to a lower standing of living in your mind?
I gave examples of where good jobs went to China, as they used the might of their national treasury to run American companies out of business.
Why do you hate America?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:32 pm to Zendog
quote:
young Pelosi could get it
Those crazy eyes never lie.
Any woman that looks through you like that has demons.
They are usually above average in the sack.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:39 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Geez, what happened to her?
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
We offshore what isn't efficient to produce here
Is wrong.
I gave you definitive examples.
They had NOTHING to do with inefficiency. IP theft, yes. The competition being subsidized by a foreign treasury, yup. No legal recourse available…also the case.
I like how you leave all of that out and just lump it under “inefficiencies.”
Again, you are a tool.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:46 pm to jimmy the leg
Bananas and coffee maybe.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 8:48 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
They had NOTHING to do with inefficiency
It has everything to do with efficiency as cost is a component of efficiency.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 9:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:If we're more effecient, why do we need tariffs?
It has everything to do with efficiency as cost is a component of efficiency.
This post was edited on 4/3/25 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 4/3/25 at 9:07 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
If we're more effecient, why do we need tariffs?
Things that make you go hmmmmm
Posted on 4/3/25 at 9:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It has everything to do with efficiency as cost is a component of efficiency.
On an in level playing field (against CCP subsidies), again, the point that you are trying to make is moronic.
Tell me mother about how women are better than men in football. No? How about basketball?
Simply put, the girls are up against a situation that is grossly unfair.
To put this in perspective, even some of the worlds largest companies don’t want to tangle with the CCP. Why, IP theft, no legal recourse, government subsidies etc.
You are a fan of the CCP, cool.
I am not.
I see the issues at hand, and they don’t have frick all to do with inefficiency.
Again, you do you, but I’m not wrong.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 9:20 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
On an in level playing field (against CCP subsidies),
We subsidize our megacorporations and banks.
Just recently the US Govt spent over 10b retooling factories for them, and every 10 years or so they require bailing out.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 9:22 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
If we're more effecient, why do we need tariffs?
China has used Mexico and Canada to circumvent tariffs.
Both of those countries need to be put in check over this.
Lastly, if China would stop using their government to attack American companies in order to steal IP (and then, knock off the product, subsidize it, and run the American company out of business), then tariffs probably wouldn’t be needed.
It’s interesting watching all of the so called conservatives carry water for the commies.
Posted on 4/3/25 at 9:23 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Just recently
No shite huh?
I wonder what that was in response to?
You are a tool.
Xi appreciates you though.
This post was edited on 4/3/25 at 9:24 pm
Popular
Back to top


1






