re: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Are GENE-ALTERING Technologies

quote:

---

Calling Tigerdoc and Crazy4Lsu.

---

Go back and read Deathbytossdive225, Salviati, and NCTigah in this thread and you should have gist of what you need to know on the scientific substance and the prestige-signaling.

This is a good example of why it helps to actually track down the underlying studies instead of relying on summaries circulating on social media. A lot of the scary language about “gene alteration” turns out to be referring to gene expression changes, which happen anytime the immune system activates either naturally or to a vaccine (mRNA or otherwise).

Well duh…….

It always was touted as a “temporary” modification of the DNA……there is no such thing as a “ temporary” modification of DNA …..everyone knew that

….it was mass hysteria created by the Dems…….

quote:

---

and also achieve their depopulation goals,

---

The stew pit don't believe these exist. Agenda 30 is real.

quote:

---

I only posted that Q drop here because it directly pertains to what this thread is about. There is a better thread for that discussion.

Trust the Plan

---

You serious with this shite guy? Plan truster in 2026? Holy crap

Yep. Ill even post a little right here but no one will read it....

quote:

---

The association's Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JP&S) was previously named the Medical Sentinel from 1996 to 2003 and masquerades as a legitimate scientific journal. It is not listed in academic literature databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, or the Web of Science. The quality and scientific validity of articles published in the journal have been criticized by medical experts, and some of the viewpoints advocated by AAPS are rejected by other scientists and medical groups.[67] The U.S. National Library of Medicine declined repeated requests from AAPS to index the journal, citing unspecified concerns.[67]

As of September 2016, JP&S was listed on Beall's List of potential or probable predatory open-access journals.[68] Quackwatch lists JP&S as an untrustworthy, non-recommended periodical.[69] An editorial in Chemical & Engineering News described the journal as a "purveyor of utter nonsense."[70] Investigative journalist Brian Deer wrote that the journal is the "house magazine of a right-wing American fringe group [AAPS]" and "is barely credible as an independent forum."[71] Writing in The Guardian, science columnist Ben Goldacre described the journal as the "in-house magazine of a rightwing US pressure group well known for polemics on homosexuality, abortion and vaccines."[72]

---

quote:

---

Publishing of scientifically discredited claims
Articles and commentaries published in the journal have argued a number of scientifically discredited claims,[67] including:

That human activity has not contributed to climate change, and that global warming will be beneficial and thus is not a cause for concern.[73][74]
That HIV does not cause AIDS.[75]
That there is a link between abortion and the risk of breast cancer.[8]
That there are possible links between autism and vaccinations.[8]
That government efforts to encourage smoking cessation and emphasize the addictive nature of nicotine are misguided.[76] In the fall of 2009, economist Michael Marlow published an article in AAPS' journal arguing that tobacco tax would decrease public health when people "switch to higher tar and nicotine brands as they smoke less."[7

---