re: PBD: British Imperial Expert: The Force Behind King Charles, Iran & Every War Since 1900

How many of the videos of them have you actually watched? I don't care what your IQ is... If you separate your prejudice of the Laroche people.. And just look at the facts happening in the news that few pay attention to... Shown in the videos if you'd watch them. It adds up.

I have already shown the history of Iran and British petroleum BP. Iran is no doubt a play toy of the British imperials... and at one point yes our own CIA mixed with British Intel..

It is quite obvious that shutting down Iran... Therefore, gutting Hezbollah and Hamas. Is not just in the best interest of Israel... it is in the best interest of stopping the very documented great reset of the world globalists.

I used to teach punks like you and you know it... so I can tell you that your conclusions usually lie in prejudice and contrary. annoying as a tick... trolling

Have you defined Lawfare yet? Do you think that Mark Elias and Andrew Weissman are protected in the highly coveted DC bar associations? DOJ documents came out looking into the Bar Association's biases.

quote:

---

How many of the videos of them have you actually watched?

---

At this point, probably 5-6

Every single one does the "use a clip without context" to assign a random data point from where they create a Sharpshooter Fallacy.

quote:

---

If you separate your prejudice of the Laroche people.

---

"Prejudice"

quote:

---

Iran is no doubt a play toy of the British imperials.

---

The UK hasn't had major influence in Iran since 1979. That was the entire point of the Revolution. They ousted the UK/US interests that were solidified in the coup of 1953.

quote:

---

It is quite obvious that shutting down Iran... Therefore, gutting Hezbollah and Hamas. Is not just in the best interest of Israel... it is in the best interest of stopping the very documented great reset of the world globalists.

---

Iran and those proxies oppose "globalism." Your point makes the opposite of sense.

Iran, Russia, China, Venezuela, and NK (the last 2 were much less impactful) were all allied and in opposition to "globalism".

Explain how Iran and Russia have promoted "globalism." I'd love to hear this

quote:

---

I used to teach punks like you and you know it... so I can tell you that your conclusions usually lie in prejudice and contrary. annoying as a tick... trolling

---

Me having to explain the very basics of these conversations to people like you who clearly don't understand them is the opposite of trolling

It's much more benevolence than any form of prejudice.

quote:

---

Have you defined Lawfare yet?

---

It's not my term/burden. Again, you show you lack the very basic understanding of the discussions behind had.

My argument is that "lawfare" has become defined in so many ways, it's malleability creates a scenario where it cannot be defined operationally.

You just engaged in a similar behavior by trying to redefine "globalism" into the opposite of what it's traditionally defined as.

BRICS is dead. Make America Great Again isn't dead... Name a USA president that has exposed MORE... When the last one that tried is 6 feet under.

How can you not see Trumps Leverage over China and the red carpet they laid out?

No one thought a US president would have the balls to very covertly yet overtly call out the British throne.

Just because BRICS existed It doesn't mean countries like Iran and Ukraine weren't blocked for terror and money laundering.

BRICS biggest pow wow was in Havana. No longer happening..

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.