- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oversight Committe meeting on Benghazi
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:01 am to S.E.C. Crazy
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:01 am to S.E.C. Crazy
The big ? is why hasn't a select committee be formed and called the former sec of defense to answer some ?'s. Pretty pointless to be mad at anybody other than the speaker of the house.
2
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:02 am to roguetiger15
Rex. You have a top general saying they were ready, they could have intervened and made a difference/impact on the situation but was never given authority by the state department. Is that not enough for you to come to the conclusion that this is all on Hillary?
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:02 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
He is slowly breaking, it may be close...
If he is under direct orders from a superior officer not to disclose the information, he is rock/hard place.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:03 am to roguetiger15
quote:
Rex. You have a top general saying they were ready, they could have intervened and made a difference/impact on the situation but was never given authority by the state department. Is that not enough for you to come to the conclusion that this is all on Hillary?
BUT LIBYA!
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:03 am to udtiger
quote:
If he is under direct orders from a superior officer not to disclose the information, he is rock/hard place.
Somebody said he was retired.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:04 am to udtiger
quote:
If he is under direct orders from a superior officer not to disclose the information, he is rock/hard place.
Not familiar with all of it, but would him disclosing it fall under whistleblower laws
Maybe a dumb question.
But if he has testimony that directly contradicts other testimony, shouldn't he be obligated and protected to give it?
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:04 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
quote:If he is under direct orders from a superior officer not to disclose the information, he is rock/hard place. Somebody said he was retired.
I think security clearance obligations extend to retirement.
My guess is he disclosed it in the closed-door session.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:05 am to Lsut81
He is retired. He can say wtf he wants now
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:06 am to Rex
quote:
NOBODY, is paying attention to this partisan witch hunt
They are asking questions of military personnel. What party to you think the General is a part of?
How is asking questions about the death of Americans and lack of military response partisan?
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:06 am to udtiger
I know it was just a movie, but Colonel Nathan Jessup told the truth. This guy can too. We can handle the truth.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:06 am to Rex
quote:
Soooooooo very desperate to keep Hillary out of the White House it's funny. There is no other point to any of this because it's going absolutely nowhere.
NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY, is paying attention to this partisan witch hunt except butt hurt Republicans such as yourself.
pretty much this. This is going nowhere b.c it has no where to go.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:07 am to Lsut81
That is the kind of investigation you get when all the documents don't get turned over or they are heavily redacted.
Which is why we needed a select committee investigating this.
I think we all know, even dems that are honest, that this president is nothing more than a liying POS.
You can keep your doctor & insurance.
It was a video.
GWB was irresponsible for spending so much money.
I will be transparent.
Which is why we needed a select committee investigating this.
I think we all know, even dems that are honest, that this president is nothing more than a liying POS.
You can keep your doctor & insurance.
It was a video.
GWB was irresponsible for spending so much money.
I will be transparent.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:07 am to roguetiger15
He states the failure to act on the state dept, that he was under. He won't give up the direct name, but you can tell, cause he's almost broken down, that he wants to give names, but he isn't...so far.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:09 am to CamdenTiger
He's given the name of the direct assistant to Hillary
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:09 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
This is going nowhere b.c it has no where to go
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:09 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
He states the failure to act on the state dept, that he was under. He won't give up the direct name, but you can tell, cause he's almost broken down, that he wants to give names, but he isn't...so far.
Sounds like he knows what the right thing to do is but is pussing out and feels bad about it.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:12 am to Rex
quote:
While people on the ground were fighting for their lives, discussions among U.S. leaders outside Libya "churned on about what we should do," but the military waited for a request for assistance from the State Department, Lovell said.
Hillary and Obama covered up while US Citizens died without as much as an attempt to try help them. Impeach the whole crew and crucify their apologist for good measure
This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 10:14 am
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:13 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
pretty much this. This is going nowhere b.c it has no where to go.
I think this is a situation where the coverup is worse than the act...
It is absolutely terrible that Americans died, but had the admin come out and said "We fricked up, we didn't know the severity of what was going on and chose to stand down out of caution" this would have been done and over.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:16 am to jb4
Not really, I think she did get called, all be it not by a select committee, but nevertheless she was called.
The biggest culprit in all this, imho, is the news media not doing their jobs because of their partisan allegiance to the liberal ideology of the progressives.
The liberals have got their pants caught on their on pitchfork.
The biggest culprit in all this, imho, is the news media not doing their jobs because of their partisan allegiance to the liberal ideology of the progressives.
The liberals have got their pants caught on their on pitchfork.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 10:17 am to Lsut81
quote:
It is absolutely terrible that Americans died, but had the admin come out and said "We fricked up, we didn't know the severity of what was going on and chose to stand down out of caution" this would have been done and over.
Yep, its always the cover-up. Cause they have denied all this. Denied that the White House was involved in the talking points. Now we find out they made up the video excuse. Lied to the families of the dead. Spent millions on commercials in Pakistan to sell the lies. All for Political gain, off the backs of dead Americans...
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News