- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Our President's attorney's allege illegal conduct by Robert Mueller
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:28 pm to VOLhalla
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:28 pm to VOLhalla
quote:Volumes?
The fact that you are cavalier about alleging ethics violations against Mueller when the President’s own attorney (who has actually seen the relevant emails!) hasn’t gone that far speaks volumes
1
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:30 pm to VOLhalla
Trump will have a great malpractice case from the pen.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:31 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
Trump will have a great malpractice case from the pen.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:31 pm to Jbird
They are fun to laugh at aren’t they? 
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:32 pm to Adam Banks
Mueller will finish the investigation with criminal charges after all.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:32 pm to Errerrerrwere
I was going to ask what charges he would end up in the pen from?
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:37 pm to Clark14
quote:
If there are no wrongdoings,then why be concerned?
So you wouldn't oppose me dragging you through the mud every day as opposed to you walking on your on two feet?
You need to nut up.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:39 pm to Jbird
Yes. His cavalier attitude towards alleging an ethics violation speaks volumes to how little respect you should give his opinion on the matter.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:40 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
Yes. His cavalier attitude towards alleging an ethics violation speaks volumes to how little respect you should give his opinion on the matter.
NopePosted on 12/16/17 at 7:40 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
The duty isn’t on them, you said you were a lawyer?
Yikes. Yes. Of course it is on them.
This post was edited on 12/16/17 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:41 pm to VOLhalla
Aren’t you the one that was all for doxxing a teenager for a CNN gif that Trump retweeted?
You hate Mexicans too, huh?
You hate Mexicans too, huh?
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:42 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Yikes. Yes. Of course it is on them.
Hey...he was pre law before he dropped out second semester freshman year...and has a high reddit karma
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:44 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
It’s pretty clear you’ve don’t have litigation experience.
I have plenty of litigation experience. In fact, I have experience with being sent potentially privileged info. I did what mueller should have done and got an ethics opinion. It isn't difficult to know when you are reading potentially privileged info.
Mueller didn't get an ethics opinion and reviewed privileged info. If he didn't ask for an opinion and he kept the info. It is a violation of his duty.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:47 pm to BBONDS25
If it’s disclosed? Wow
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:52 pm to Errerrerrwere
THIs is like the fourth or fifth time you’ve made that same post towards me. That’s really, really sad
But again, I don’t care if a 30 year old racist gets doxxed and I love Mexicans.
If you’d like to ask again in a few months go ahead. You’ll get the same response as before
But again, I don’t care if a 30 year old racist gets doxxed and I love Mexicans.
If you’d like to ask again in a few months go ahead. You’ll get the same response as before
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:55 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
If it’s disclosed? Wow
Yep. You need to brush up. Rule 4.4(b)
This post was edited on 12/16/17 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:57 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
But again, I don’t care if a 30 year old racist gets doxxed
Are you threatening people, bigot?
Posted on 12/16/17 at 7:57 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I did what mueller should have done and got an ethics opinion. It isn't difficult to know when you are reading potentially privileged info.
You have no idea what Mueller should have done because you’ve never seen the emails
Good attorneys don’t make judgements on another attorney’s ethical duties without even knowing basic facts of the situation. Please tell me you don’t practice anymore
Posted on 12/16/17 at 8:00 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
Good attorneys don’t make judgements on another attorney’s ethical duties without even knowing basic facts of the situation. Please tell me you don’t practice anymore
I don't. I am lucky enough to own a couple of businesses that Don't require me to practice.
Your pontification of what good attorneys do and don't do is humorous. The rules are clear. If what Trumps attorneys allege happened....happened, Mueller screwed up. That is all I have ever said. Your insistence to the contrary doesn't change that fact.
Rule 4.4(b)
This post was edited on 12/16/17 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 12/16/17 at 8:10 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
The move from Mueller's team to obtain the emails from the GSA stymied efforts from transition officials, who were prepared for Mueller's request for the emails and had separated messages they believed contained privileged information. Mueller now has access to all of them.
quote:LINK
Langhofer's letter accuses Mueller's team of “unlawfully produc[ing] TFA’s private materials, including privileged communications, to the Special Counsel’s Office,” according to Reuters.
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News