Started By
Message

re: Our President's attorney's allege illegal conduct by Robert Mueller

Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:11 pm to
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73430 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

I read all that, but you don't realize how hard you trolled me by not inserting line breaks manually.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Fruit of the poisonous tree.


Yes, but what he's saying is this.

Let's say you read the email and it says "the body is in the park under the big oak"

Now you can't just go the park and dig up the body because you have to explain to the court HOW you found that body.

But what you CAN do is is use your knowledge of where that body is to do further investigation.

Heck, I'll give you a real world example from one of my own cases.

We had a arrested a soldier for murder and he confessed, told us where the body was and everything. His lawyer got the confession tossed. The entire thing thrown out.

Well, we knew he did it, and we knew where the body was, but we couldn't develop the case based on anything said in his confession.

No problem, you just have to figure out a different way to get the information . But once you KNOW the information it is easier to figure out another way to get it.

In this case the a simple drug sting set up near the location of the body with a drug dog involved resulted in the discovery of a body.

Perfectly legal.

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48262 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:20 pm to
True. But this isn't about a conviction. This is about impeachment. Mueller is dirty and it taints everything. Would certainly go to his credibility even in a criminal matter.

If Trump is dirty I'd love to know. The emails would have been leaked if there was anything big. This is just evidence of Mueller being dirty.
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 12:21 pm
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

No problem, you just have to figure out a different way to get the information . But once you KNOW the information it is easier to figure out another way to get it.


Exactly. You can't unknow something. Good explanation.
Posted by Mephistopheles
Member since Aug 2007
8328 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

True. But this isn't about a conviction. This is about impeachment. Mueller is dirty and it taints everything. Would certainly go to his credibility even in a criminal matter.


Agreed. And the distinction is key here. It may play better for Kushner than it does for Trump. If he were tried by the Senate, they set their own rules for evidence (if I understand correctly).
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23680 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

Mueller didn't get an ethics opinion and reviewed privileged info. If he didn't ask for an opinion and he kept the info. It is a violation of his duty.


You’re way out here. Maybe you call Plattsmire’s Office for a chat, but who does the republican appointed special prosecutor call?

Besides , I’d be willing to wager that none of this is attorney client privilege anyway. Trump Jr says that chats with Trump Sr are attorney client communication and neither is an attorney. Also the privilege is much more narrow than these tv talking heads suggest. Not every communication with a lawyer is privileged.

But of course none of us have seen the emails so we can’t evaluate them for potential privilege. This is, quite frankly, a fluff propaganda discussion.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram