Started By
Message

re: Oregon Gov. Kate Brown commutes sentences of all death row inmates

Posted on 12/14/22 at 5:40 pm to
Posted by BigBobbyStorey
New Lodge, Belfast
Member since May 2021
1058 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 5:40 pm to
I guess I am one of the few who are anti abortion and anti death penalty.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

I just find it disingenuous to argue that someone who committed some of the crimes these 17 in particular have done deserves to live, and then arguing in the next breath that the 275,982 voluntary abortions carried out in Oregon since the last execution is ok.

Me too.

You can be against the government telling women they have to have babies, AND against abortion at the same time. Just because I don't want the government to force the woman to have the baby doesn't mean I want her to abort it.
quote:

I can't wrap my head around the morality here.

Obviously.

It's probably all the wrong assumptions you allow yourself to make.
Posted by ForLSU56
Rapides Parish
Member since Feb 2015
5582 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Progressives always know better than everyone else. Just ask them.


Oh, you don't have to ask, they yell it from the mountain tops to every form of social and mainstream media.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34244 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

So you are pro infanticide(murder)?


I mean, live babies are...alive.

You posted:
quote:

the government should allow terminating the lives of babies


It just seems odd to me to have that view.

I’m pro-life, and I’m against capital punishment. I strive to be consistent in the application of my beliefs.

quote:

So you are pro homicide because you support the death penalty?


Again...
quote:

You will have to point out where I said this.
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 7:17 pm
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

You said that you supported killing live babies.

I quoted it for you.

Liar.

Link?
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34244 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:17 pm to
I put the quote above.

ETA - Here it is again:

quote:

the government should allow terminating the lives of babies
This post was edited on 12/14/22 at 7:18 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34244 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas online on 12/14/22 at 1:36 pm to AwesomeSauce quote: You're probably right though, the government should allow terminating the lives of babies You just insist on having the government all up in people's business, don't you? I would rather minimize the impact of government in citizens' lives. I don't want the government taking citizens lives, and I don't want the government telling women they have to have babies. ReplyOptionsTop up vote1down vote0
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas online on 12/14/22 at 1:36 pm to AwesomeSauce quote: You're probably right though, the government should allow terminating the lives of babies You just insist on having the government all up in people's business, don't you? I would rather minimize the impact of government in citizens' lives. I don't want the government taking citizens lives, and I don't want the government telling women they have to have babies. ReplyOptionsTop up vote1down vote0

Look again,

"...quote: You're probably right though, the government should allow terminating the lives of babies"

I was quoting AwesomeSauces post.

Here's his/her/its post:
quote:

I wonder if there will be a push to retry these cases now like there was in 2006 when Oregon changed their Death Penalty laws? I think they cut that short and closed that loophole after one of the guys still on their death row killed two young girls in separate incidents while he was being retried. You can see what these inmates did to get on death row. Even see transcripts where the majority of the 17 confessed and even reveled in it. You're probably right though, the government should allow terminating the lives of babies if they are inconvenient, but keep alive the guy who raped and killed a 3 year old. Also the five guys who committed varying murders and assaults on kids from 8-15, they obviously deserve the state paying six figures annually to keep them alive. Priorities! Death to unwanted babies, keep alive the guy who killed a teenage couple and raped and sodomized them. The US prison system needs to be overhauled and corrected... absolutely. The most heinous and violent members of society need to be removed from society and resources that could better society by rehabbing those that can, and lifting up those in need do not need to be wasted on them... absolutely. There are finite resources allotted to society. We cannot afford to contribute to keeping alive someone who raped and murdered children while we continue to fail children who have to rely on charity and school to be warm and eat because the EBT ran out due to improper funding, or frivolous spending, and dad is serving for strike three on possession. Spend the money on the next generation, not on those who have already cost taxpayers millions, and will only cost us more.

LINK

...where Awesome said it mocking me, and not in a serious way.

This was my response where I quote Awesome saying that:

LINK

The problem with AwesomeSauce, and many others, is the inability to understand that one can be against government prohibitions against abortion and yet still be against abortion itself at the same time.

This is easily seen once you stop insisting that the government try to solve all of our perceived problems. Maybe there are other ways to stop abortions without involving the government forcing women to give birth against their will.

So you weren't lying, just confused. I apologize for calling you a liar.
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
10031 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

I’m pro life so I support this.
I'm pro choice but am against abortion. In this case I'm staunchly pro-life...of their victims.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Oregon Gov. Kate Brown


Request that this political thread be moved to the appropriate board
Posted by Highthoughts
Member since Sep 2022
313 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:51 pm to
Man y’all are some incredibly fragile personalities
Posted by TCO
Member since Jul 2022
2512 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

Request that this political thread be moved to the appropriate board


Damn straight
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Man y’all are some incredibly fragile personalities


Rules are rules
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34244 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

So you weren't lying, just confused. I apologize for calling you a liar.


Indeed I was. Thanks for clarifying .

Posted by tigerbutt
Deep South
Member since Jun 2006
24602 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:11 pm to
F’n whore
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7680 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

It's probably all the wrong assumptions you allow yourself to make

I mean... Didn't are discussion start with you assuming my stance?! I am a huge proponent of limited government. My qualm with this decision is that this commuting of the sentences was well received by the same circle that protested and threatened lives just a few months ago when Roe v Wade was ruled unconstitutional. So apologies if I took your stance for abortion to being morally ok with it. I honestly find it to be the most morally ambiguous topic currently being discussed. I do not think the government should force a woman to carry a child. At the same time I do believe that life begins at the embryonic stage (as do +99% of scientists).

Also apologies that quoting me apparently had posters thinking you advocated for killing babies.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Didn't are discussion start with you assuming my stance?!

No.

Here is my first post ITT, responding to the OP:
quote:

Good.

I hate to see the government taking citizens lives.

This was your response to my post:
quote:


I wonder if there will be a push to retry these cases now like there was in 2006 when Oregon changed their Death Penalty laws? I think they cut that short and closed that loophole after one of the guys still on their death row killed two young girls in separate incidents while he was being retried.

You can see what these inmates did to get on death row. Even see transcripts where the majority of the 17 confessed and even reveled in it. You're probably right though, the government should allow terminating the lives of babies if they are inconvenient, but keep alive the guy who raped and killed a 3 year old. Also the five guys who committed varying murders and assaults on kids from 8-15, they obviously deserve the state paying six figures annually to keep them alive. Priorities! Death to unwanted babies, keep alive the guy who killed a teenage couple and raped and sodomized them.

The US prison system needs to be overhauled and corrected... absolutely. The most heinous and violent members of society need to be removed from society and resources that could better society by rehabbing those that can, and lifting up those in need do not need to be wasted on them... absolutely. There are finite resources allotted to society. We cannot afford to contribute to keeping alive someone who raped and murdered children while we continue to fail children who have to rely on charity and school to be warm and eat because the EBT ran out due to improper funding, or frivolous spending, and dad is serving for strike three on possession. Spend the money on the next generation, not on those who have already cost taxpayers millions, and will only cost us more.

I suspect that you may have thought you were responding to someone else.
quote:

My qualm with this decision is that this commuting of the sentences was well received by the same circle that protested and threatened lives just a few months ago when Roe v Wade was ruled unconstitutional.

Yes, hypocrites exist. Not much you can do about it. I try not to let that influence what I'm willing to accept from the government.
quote:

Also apologies that quoting me apparently had posters thinking you advocated for killing babies.

Meh, I've done time on the Poli board. This place is downright civilized comparatively.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27396 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8909 posts
Posted on 12/14/22 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

I am not against the death penalty in theory but in practice, all it does is cost more money due to appeals and we have killed innocent people


I’ve got some oceanfront property in Kansas to sell you if you think people sentenced to life are not doing the same appeals costing the tax payers the same amount of money…..
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
8909 posts
Posted on 12/15/22 at 12:05 am to
quote:

You think liberals are going to push for releasing the worst of the worst violent criminals?


You should keep up with the news, John Bel Edwards just had someone granted parole that previously had a life sentence without parole for killing two people. Against the victims family request against it.

This lib just took the first step. Phase one complete.

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram