- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ok Karoline, we know that the activist judges are trying to screw Trump
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:34 pm to SammyTiger
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:34 pm to SammyTiger
You wanna. Tell me where he's not upholding up the constitution? Didn't think so.
1
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:35 pm to ugasickem
It wouldn’t do you any good for Sammy to explain it to you.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:37 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Conservatives judge shop too. There are a few district courts the GOP loves to use as the venue when they've got something they want to block from a Dem administration.
This is how the game is played, folks.
This is how the game is played, folks.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:38 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
An armed man arrested near Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home in Maryland was charged with "attempts to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap or murder" the justice, according to a charging document in the case.
Dems only care when it’s liberal judges making rulings.
They are willing to kill conservative judges over a ruling they don’t like.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:42 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
I cant hear you, Mary McCord is laughing too loud
That idiot Sammy would have to google who that is.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 8:55 pm to cajunangelle
bullshite
ALWAYS bullshite
They don't reveal the methodology of their "polls".
They don't reveal the leading questions that condition the respondents.
If y'all still fall for their shite?
You are dumber than the ones who have, long ago, surrendered their rationality to TDS.
This is a WINNING issue.
ALWAYS bullshite
They don't reveal the methodology of their "polls".
They don't reveal the leading questions that condition the respondents.
If y'all still fall for their shite?
You are dumber than the ones who have, long ago, surrendered their rationality to TDS.
This is a WINNING issue.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:02 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
have y’all ever considered he’s just doing his job and he actually has to try and rule on the law?
You mean the law that SCOTUS has already reviewed it in 1948 and ruled it not subject to judicial review? Yeah that law right?
LINK “ Supreme Court’s 1948 Ruling: Alien Enemy Act and Presidential Power”
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:11 pm to ABearsFanNMS
The SCOTUS in Ludecke says that interpretation of the statute is up for judicial review
What isn’t up for judicial reviews is actions the president makes if the statue does apply.
The SCOTUS literally makes a judicial ruling on whether the application applied in that opinion. (They ruled that the act applied because the US was still in a declared war)
Why even bother posting that shite if you didn’t read it?
What isn’t up for judicial reviews is actions the president makes if the statue does apply.
The SCOTUS literally makes a judicial ruling on whether the application applied in that opinion. (They ruled that the act applied because the US was still in a declared war)
Why even bother posting that shite if you didn’t read it?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:15 pm to GamecockUltimate
Pretty dangerous rhetoric from the WH honestly.
Is it as dangerous as a federal judge attempting to prevent the deportation of gangsters that were in the US illegally? They were literally out of the country when he tried to get them back. The judge's daughter's business is to provide support and legal representation to illegal aliens. Conflict of interest?
These dudes were not here picking strawberries on expired visas and got picked up, they are cartel muscle many of them are assassins.
What kind of human being could stump for these animals?
Is it as dangerous as a federal judge attempting to prevent the deportation of gangsters that were in the US illegally? They were literally out of the country when he tried to get them back. The judge's daughter's business is to provide support and legal representation to illegal aliens. Conflict of interest?
These dudes were not here picking strawberries on expired visas and got picked up, they are cartel muscle many of them are assassins.
What kind of human being could stump for these animals?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:16 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
I want Trump to tell these judges to stick it up their lubed up asses and GFY’s.
Have not read through thread, and this has probably been stated: they would use it to impeach and convict Trump. Could they get the votes? Maybe/probably not, BUT keep in mind Trump is cramping the Republican’s style as well.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 9:18 pm
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:35 pm to SammyTiger
Reading must be really hard for you:
quote:
In the landmark 1948 Supreme Court case, Ludecke v. Watkins, the court established critical precedents regarding the Alien Enemy Act and the scope of presidential power in matters of national security. This ruling underscored the non-justiciable nature of removals enacted by the president under the Alien Enemy Act, meaning these actions cannot be challenged or reviewed by the judiciary.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:45 pm to ABearsFanNMS
Just say you didn’t read the decision.
Because the Court takes up a challenge to the applicability of the statues in the same case.
The validity and construction of the Act can be challenged in court.
Because the Court takes up a challenge to the applicability of the statues in the same case.
quote:
The Alien Enemy Act, construed as permitting resort to the courts only to challenge its validity and construction, and to raise questions of the existence of a "declared war" and of alien enemy status, does not violate the Bill of lights of the Federal Constitution.
The validity and construction of the Act can be challenged in court.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 9:55 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
quote:
And that the left is judge shopping. We’ve seen it since the 1st EO. I’m tired of watching it and seeing the White House continue to comply and fight in the (crooked) court. I want Trump to tell these judges to stick it up their lubed up asses and GFY’s.
I have no problem with that and it needs to be said every day.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:40 am to SammyTiger
quote:
You also don’t get to pick your judge when to file in a jurisdiction.
Iirc Boasberg is the chief judge, so assigned it to himself. So if coordinated, not a good look.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:47 am to Bring Da Wood
quote:
Just get Bondi to find something like collusion
Pam Bondi is a useless waste of space. She won't be doing anything to help our cause.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News