Started By
Message

re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread

Posted on 4/11/26 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
63253 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by TroutGuy
Member since Mar 2026
116 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 12:30 pm to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39798 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Iran does not have authority over international waters.


What about the area where the strait is at its narrowest? Both Oman and Iran claim their territorial waters at 12 nautical miles, which is the international standard, and I think there might be a portion of the strait which falls within their waters and not internationally.
Posted by TroutGuy
Member since Mar 2026
116 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 12:35 pm to
I've gained a LOT of respect for the UAE in this war- they have actually attacked Iran militarily, are boycotting the Pakistan talks and are making a "not even the licensing fee" offer to Iran. I do wonder what they are hinting at in the last sentence here- maybe mining Iran's portion of the Strait? That would screw both their oil income and toll income, so I'm hoping it happens.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by phaz
Waddell, AZ
Member since Jan 2009
6826 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

What about the area where the strait is at its narrowest? Both Oman and Iran claim their territorial waters at 12 nautical miles, which is the international standard, and I think there might be a portion of the strait which falls within their waters and not internationally.


Can't block access for the other countries on the Gulf, incoming or outgoing, kind of like an easement:

quote:

Transit Passage Rights: Under international law (specifically UNCLOS, to which Iran is not a party but is bound by custom), ships and aircraft have the right of "transit passage," meaning coastal states cannot suspend or hamper transit through straits used for international navigation

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39798 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 12:53 pm to
I don't think Iran has ratified the law of the sea and what other punitive measures can you invoke on a country which you have already bombed out and sanctioned out? If they are bound by custom and not international law, as you link itself says, then if they consider the attacks by Israel and the US to be violations of international law, then I don't know if invoking international law to them is going to be a persuasive argument.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15587 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:14 pm to
quote:


I don't think Iran has ratified the law of the sea and what other punitive measures can you invoke on a country which you have already bombed out and sanctioned out? If they are bound by custom and not international law, as you link itself says, then if they consider the attacks by Israel and the US to be violations of international law, then I don't know if invoking international law to them is going to be a persuasive argument.


They ratified the previous version in 1958
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39798 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

They ratified the previous version in 1958


Yeah again, I don't think that is going to tip the scales for an Iranian government which already disregards international law.
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
10369 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:20 pm to
Same. They’ve been as secular, level headed, and rational in the international politics the whole time.
Posted by Shaun176
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
3092 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

I don't know if invoking international law to them is going to be a persuasive argument.


Once mines are cleared, there will be a path on the Omani side. They don't have any mine layers left. If countries would escort their ships, they have air defense systems for missiles and drones. Iran's capabilities are greatly degraded. Don't believe the Iranian propaganda. That is more about trying to convince their own supporters to not give up on them.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39798 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

They don't have any mine layers left.


They weren't using mine layers, I don't think. They were rather using smaller craft from what I read.

quote:

If countries would escort their ships, they have air defense systems for missiles and drones.


Yeah dude, the risk is still going to be so high that I don't think insurers will be moved by the escorts. That is an extremely expensive proposition as well.

quote:

Iran's capabilities are greatly degraded.


For their drones, I don't think so. The heavier ordinance, yes, but drones are their bread and butter.
Posted by Huge Richard
Member since Dec 2018
4540 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by Huge Richard
Member since Dec 2018
4540 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5192 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

it isn’t just 90%, as I told Konstanin on @triggerpod, it’s 92%


That's a big number and it bodes well, but it's not the relevant number. Overthrow of the regime won't be decided by election, so the outcome depends on how many are willing to take up arms when they become available, or resort to guerilla warfare using whatever tools and means are available. If a large enough percentage are willing to put their lives on the line, then the already weakened regime will go down.
Posted by Shaun176
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
3092 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Overthrow of the regime won't be decided by election, so the outcome depends on how many are willing to take up arms


This is why there will be heavy propaganda about any ceasefire deal. The regime leaders have to look strong or risk fracturing.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39798 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Overthrow of the regime won't be decided by election, so the outcome depends on how many are willing to take up arms when they become available, or resort to guerilla warfare using whatever tools and means are available. If a large enough percentage are willing to put their lives on the line, then the already weakened regime will go down.


And what if they decide they don't want to do that?
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5192 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

The regime leaders have to look strong or risk fracturing.


It's probable that the fracturing has already started. The rank and file of the IRCG are figuring out that they're the hunted now and they and their families are no longer safe walking the streets, or in their homes. The new leaders who have yet to establish their right to authority have to watch their backs 24/7. And there's no quick fix when the economy has been bombed into a depression.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5192 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

And what if they decide they don't want to do that?


If that happens, we'll see. It will be multiple years before the regime recovers from the pounding, so they'll be vulnerable to both internal and external forces for an extended period.
This post was edited on 4/11/26 at 2:19 pm
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39798 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

If that happens, we'll see. It will be multiple years before the regime recovers from the pounding, so they'll be vulnerable to both internal and external forces for an extended period.



Sure, but for all the insistence that Iran is teetering, the regime appears really resilient.
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
16363 posts
Posted on 4/11/26 at 2:28 pm to
You love you some fanatical Muslim dick.
first pageprev pagePage 682 of 845Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram