- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Round 3 of the Impeachment
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:55 am to Pechon
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:55 am to Pechon
Shiff has allowed him to answer every other question about who he spoke with and who this and who that...no objections. No concern about outing the whistleblower there...
But then when a targeted question about who he told in the intelligence community and the schiff hits the fan..."whoa...can't ask that because it might disclose the whisleblower."
How the hell could you know that about that particular person unless you know the whisleblower's identity???
But then when a targeted question about who he told in the intelligence community and the schiff hits the fan..."whoa...can't ask that because it might disclose the whisleblower."
How the hell could you know that about that particular person unless you know the whisleblower's identity???
1
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:56 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:how would Schiff know? He said he didnt know the identity. Vindman testified under oath he didnt know the identity
Once Vindman said it was a member of the intel community, it was obvious that this person could possibly be the whistleblower.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:57 am to mouton
quote:I work a government job and took the day off
Cliffs?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:57 am to Centinel
quote:Because those named persons can be demanded to appear before the committee and shite will have to admit the whistleblower is one of those named and prevent that person from appearing.
But we don't know who the whistleblower is, and neither does the House Committee. If we don't know who he is, what does it matter if Vindman names the person in the community he discussed the information with?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:58 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
how would Schiff know? He said he didnt know the identity. Vindman testified under oath he didnt know the identity
Correct. But err on the side of caution if you may be outing the possible whistleblower.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
you may be outing the possible whistleblower.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Once Vindman said it was a member of the intel community, it was obvious that this person could possibly be the whistleblower.
Eric Ciaramella. It's okay. You can say his name.
Adam Schiff raping preteen black boys at Chateau Marmont in LA is likely the only worst kept secret in DC.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Correct. But err on the side of caution if you may be outing the possible whistleblower.
That's some weak assed shite, in that vein Schiff never would have called this weak assed officer Vindman.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to HubbaBubba
Why is pence attending inauguration or not big deal?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:
Err, he told the Ukrainian president to work with Barr (his DOJ) on an investigation.
See a few pages back where I posted a link from September 25th with the DOJ confirming that Trump never mentioned it to Barr and that they had not even discussed it
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:
Did Biden have the Ukraine prosecutor fired?
Was Hunter on the board of Burisma, which was being investigated by the prosecutor that Biden had fired?
I would add
What was US national interest to have this prosecutor fired and withhold $$$
Would US follow the wishes of a foreign govt to fire a prosecutor that was investigating a US company...which had a foreign leaders son on the board...
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:you know thats straight bull shite right. You know it, but wont admit it.
Correct. But err on the side of caution if you may be outing the possible whistleblower.
Vindman straight up lied when he said he didnt know the whistleblower, as did Schiff
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:59 am to AuburnTigers
That dude behind the Council is a big boy.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 10:00 am to Centinel
quote:And Schiff stopping the questioning of Vindman about the second person he told about the call says SCHIFF knows the whistleblower.
Which makes Vindman the leaker.
This is over
Posted on 11/19/19 at 10:01 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
But err on the side of caution if you may be outing the possible whistle blower.
Then they shouldn't be naming any names if thats your plan of action....bc the whistle blower could be literally anyone that they've already named
I can only hope that it comes out all these witnesses and Schiff knew all along who the WB is
Posted on 11/19/19 at 10:01 am to bstew3006
quote:
What was US national interest to have this prosecutor fired and withhold $$$
This is well documented
Posted on 11/19/19 at 10:01 am to Cali 4 LSU
Here comes republican counsel.... Here comes republican counsel....
STOP IT!
STOP IT!
Posted on 11/19/19 at 10:01 am to bmy
quote:
Trump mentioned Joe Biden specifically. Did he mention Burisma
Looks like both according to the transcript, if this really even matters. Do you NOT want corruption investigated? Is there a problem with investigating corruption/connections, etc, regardless of political affiliation? Surely you want corruption investigated or an investigation to at least see if there was corruption, especially when we are giving millions of taxpayer dollars....right?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 10:01 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
Vindman straight up lied when he said he didnt know the whistleblower, as did Schiff
This is why they can't let him testify.
His testimony wouldn't be groundbreaking either way aside from outing Schiff, Vindman, et al and their previous knowledge of the complaint. But as always, the coverup is always worse than the crime. In the Senate, that would all come out and turn this on its head.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 10:02 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:How convenient. Hopefully, someone sees Adam Schit get beat half to death and the court prevents the eyewitness from testifying against the person who did the beating. That's the new standard now, right?
Correct. But err on the side of caution if you may be outing the possible whistleblower.
Page 15 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News