- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Round 3 of the Impeachment
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:51 am to Ex-Popcorn
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:51 am to Ex-Popcorn
Of course he's lying.
His play is "I talked to someone in the Intel communittee about the call but I can say that I do not know if he is the whistleblower bc that name hasn't been officially released".
It's bs but that's his play.
His play is "I talked to someone in the Intel communittee about the call but I can say that I do not know if he is the whistleblower bc that name hasn't been officially released".
It's bs but that's his play.
0
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:51 am to cajunangelle
quote:
The R lawyer up now should continue with this...
yep...missed opportunity. this is the smoking gun for pubs. I would spend the rest of the day on that one issue. I would make Schiff jump in over and over again. It looks dirty for Schiff and an attorney to keep telling this guy to not answer the question when he's already testified that he does not know the identify of the whistleblower.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:51 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:
If there is a credible accusation then it warrants an investigation wouldn't you agree?
There is nothing remotely credible about his allegation. We both know that.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:52 am to Wednesday
He's doing better today tho
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:52 am to Sherman Klump
quote:
Counsel seems to be moving a little quicker. Looks to have a purpose this time.
What you guys fail to grasp I think is that the Republicans have scripted this just as much as the Dems.
When Castor looks slow and dumb, it's for a reason.
When a Republican Rep looks all nice and chummy, it's for a reason.
This post was edited on 11/19/19 at 9:53 am
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:52 am to cajunangelle
They should jave hammered the point of it being ridiculous to not identify any particular witness since neither Vindman nor any of the Congressmen know the identity of the WB.
That's a problem with them pretending not to know, and we should jam that down their throat.
That's a problem with them pretending not to know, and we should jam that down their throat.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:52 am to HubbaBubba
Republican counsel looks sounds and looks so much better.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:52 am to jb4
quote:Need to find her twitter and send her here.
The blonde
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:52 am to TommyStGeorge
Here's the other rub that I have with Vindman leaking the info:
It doesn't matter if the whistleblower had the clearance, he didn't have the need to know. What if he wasn't read on for the caveats or compartmentalization? It doesn't matter if that person has the same clearance or better, if they don't have need to know to that information, they're not supposed to have access.
He's a staff officer, he knows this shite. If I did something like this when I had a TS/SCI, I would have had my clearance stripped and given an Article 15 or worse.
It doesn't matter if the whistleblower had the clearance, he didn't have the need to know. What if he wasn't read on for the caveats or compartmentalization? It doesn't matter if that person has the same clearance or better, if they don't have need to know to that information, they're not supposed to have access.
He's a staff officer, he knows this shite. If I did something like this when I had a TS/SCI, I would have had my clearance stripped and given an Article 15 or worse.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:52 am to OchoDedos
Guys, what a fricking SHITSHOW. Here's to another 4 years to the greatest President of all time.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:53 am to bmy
quote:
There is nothing remotely credible about his allegation. We both know that.
Did Biden have the Ukraine prosecutor fired?
Was Hunter on the board of Burisma, which was being investigated by the prosecutor that Biden had fired?
Those two facts alone warrant an investigation in order to clear even the appearance of corruption from Biden's good name.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:53 am to Centinel
quote:
When Castor looks slow and dumb, it's for a reason.
He always looks slow and dumb. Hell of an actor
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:54 am to SOKAL
quote:
They should jave hammered the point of it being ridiculous to not identify any particular witness since neither Vindman nor any of the Congressmen know the identity of the WB.
That's a problem with them pretending not to know, and we should jam that down their throat.
Once Vindman said it was a member of the intel community, it was obvious that this person could possibly be the whistleblower.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:54 am to bmy
Only one that will certainly look worse is Vindman and Schiff.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:54 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:
Did Biden have the Ukraine prosecutor fired?
Was Hunter on the board of Burisma, which was being investigated by the prosecutor that Biden had fired?
Those two facts alone warrant an investigation in order to clear even the appearance of corruption from Biden's good name.
I agree. Now why hasn't Trump had the DOJ open up an investigation into the allegation?
It's because he wanted it off the books.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:54 am to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
yep...missed opportunity
No...they're serving up this rat on a platter to Jordan, Radcliffe, and Stefanick
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:55 am to SidewalkDawg
Thanks for posting everyone. I'm at work and am jumping over here occasionally to get an update. I don't think I could stomach watching anyway. Keep it going!!
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:55 am to roadGator
quote:
Write this day down, y’all. BMY is not stealing from the taxpayers today. Holy shite.
Cliffs?
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:55 am to bmy
quote:
I agree. Now why hasn't Trump had the DOJ open up an investigation into the allegation?
It's because he wanted it off the books.
Err, he told the Ukrainian president to work with Barr (his DOJ) on an investigation.
Posted on 11/19/19 at 9:55 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Once Vindman said it was a member of the intel community, it was obvious that this person could possibly be the whistleblower.
But we don't know who the whistleblower is, and neither does the House Committee. If we don't know who he is, what does it matter if Vindman names the person in the community he discussed the information with? I mean Vindman testified he also didn't know who the whistleblower was.
Unless of course Vindman is lying.
This post was edited on 11/19/19 at 9:58 am
Page 14 of 56
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News