- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official Pillow Guy Symposium: only flat-earthers remain excited
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:38 am to OldManRiver
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:38 am to OldManRiver
quote:
It wasn't Mike, but 2 guys on his "red team"
Sorry but if the data was faked, then the FBI would be all over it with the MSM. No american just goes to china to set all that shite up.
The voting machine data provided by the dominon whistleblower had IPv6 traffic from multiple machines. Something was passing data to those machines or alerting it. Theres no excuse for that from Dominion.
fox-it article on IPv6 spoofing
This post was edited on 8/12/21 at 9:41 am
1
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:39 am to OldManRiver
Buried at the literal end of the Washington Times hit piece:
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:40 am to Simplemaaan
quote:
I keep saying that if fraud occurred in such great amounts that someone involved woulda come out by now.
Brought to you by the folks who give us, "If any of this were real, why won't the news cover it?!"
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:40 am to Simplemaaan
quote:
There are no goods. I keep saying that if fraud occurred in such great amounts that someone involved woulda come out by now.
You forget about the 1,000s of sworn affidavits right after the election from election workers?
Claim isn't there is no election fraud, the claim is Mike Lindell doesn't have the goods.
Its equivalent to saying Killary Clinton isn't responsible for 70+ deaths
vs
Killary Clinton isn't responsible for Seth Rich death
Mike has today to show the goods.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:41 am to hometownhero89
quote:
The voting machine data provided by the dominon whistleblower had IPv6 traffic from multiple machines. Something was passing data to those machines or alerting it. Theres no excuse for that from Dominion.
You are basing this from the 'forensic image' Lindell's team got off the internet yesterday?
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:42 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Colleague of Tina Peters.
Ahh, okay. I was thinking it was Code Monkey or one of his red team members.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:44 am to VoxDawg
None of that was in the original article, and this is new from yesterday
Sounds like Mike got his lawyer to speak with Washington Times and distance from Merrit, and basically say that all is well
So we have a classic he said she said situation. This will be easily solved by the end of the day. Either Mike shares the packets, or he doesn't.
Also, these quotes are why people are so skeptical/dismissive of this whole thing
So now the excuse is "Well we just got a little bit the other day, we don't know what's in there". Considering the entire conference was built around Mike screaming for months about all the iron-clad proof he had FROM THE DATA, how the frick do you reconcile those statements
quote:
Clarification: The article previously described Mr. Merritt as Lindell’s lead cyber expert. Mr. Merritt is a cyber expert on the red team hired by Mr. Lindell to interrogate the data for the symposium, and does not work directly for Mr. Lindell.
Sounds like Mike got his lawyer to speak with Washington Times and distance from Merrit, and basically say that all is well
So we have a classic he said she said situation. This will be easily solved by the end of the day. Either Mike shares the packets, or he doesn't.
Also, these quotes are why people are so skeptical/dismissive of this whole thing
quote:
Phil Waldron who is the leader of the red team, said only a small slice of the data was provided to the red team, just days before the symposium.
Mr. Waldron said the remaining data, not interrogated during the symposium, could contain the packet captures and other data needed to prove China hacked the election. He also said that ample evidence was contained in the data that points to other significant election anomalies, that were just as significant and worth unpacking during the symposium.
So now the excuse is "Well we just got a little bit the other day, we don't know what's in there". Considering the entire conference was built around Mike screaming for months about all the iron-clad proof he had FROM THE DATA, how the frick do you reconcile those statements
This post was edited on 8/12/21 at 9:47 am
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:46 am to OldManRiver
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:47 am to OldManRiver
quote:
None of that was in the original article, and this is new from yesterday
quote:
Clarification: The article previously described Mr. Merritt as Lindell’s lead cyber expert. Mr. Merritt is a cyber expert on the red team hired by Mr. Lindell to interrogate the data for the symposium, and does not work directly for Mr. Lindell.
Sounds like Mike got his lawyer to speak with Washington Times and distance from Merrit, and basically say that all is well
So we have a classic he said she said situation. This will be easily solved by the end of the day. Either Mike shares the packets, or he doesn't.
And people seriously still wonder why no one trusts the news any more?
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:50 am to Poohbear8487
quote:
And people seriously still wonder why no one trusts the news any more
Actually, the fact that the journalist allowed Mike and co. to defend their position, and have the clarification part at the bottom, is refreshing for once. Usually the articles are printed, and if anything comes out after that disputes it, it's just ignored and move on to the next thing
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:52 am to Jax Teller
This post was edited on 8/12/21 at 10:00 am
Posted on 8/12/21 at 9:55 am to GhostOfFreedom
Dr. Shiva saying on WarRoom that the difference between reported election #s and the Symposium recording are 4.2% across EVERY state.
Meaning Trump was cheated out of -4.2% across the board.
Meaning Trump was cheated out of -4.2% across the board.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:00 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Dr. Shiva saying on WarRoom that the difference between reported election #s and the Symposium recording are 4.2% across EVERY state.
So he should be able to prove it pretty easy, right?
1) Put together a paper that outlines his methodology, and exactly what steps he took to come to his conclusion
2) Compile and share all the supporting data he used in his work
3) Place this all on Github or something similar, share the link and invite anybody to poke holes and prove he's false
This isn't hard if he truly has what he claims he has
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:01 am to OldManRiver
quote:
This isn't hard if he truly has what he claims he has
Right now he is currently talking about smoking crack for 14 days straight. When will he release the pcap data? Oh yeah he wont bc its all bullshite.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:01 am to Poohbear8487
If there are any goods. I just think this country is ready for complete political and financial overhaul. And I’m very afraid of how we have to get there. We blame politicians and term limits. Terms are limited by the amount of people who vote for them.
I think Trump and his supporters got screwed. But I wish someone involved in the actual participation of cheating would come forward. But in today’s America no one will investigate.
I think Trump and his supporters got screwed. But I wish someone involved in the actual participation of cheating would come forward. But in today’s America no one will investigate.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:07 am to Poohbear8487
quote:
You forget about the 1,000s of sworn affidavits right after the election from election workers?
I looked at 234 of the affidavits, the ones from MI, the only thing that would have made them less credible is if they were written in crayon.
I guess I have different ideas about what constitutes a “expert” in a field, what I consider “evidence”, and what a professional fraud investigation looks like. This thing is like a late night infomercial trying to sell a no money down real estate investment scheme.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:08 am to hubertcumberdale
What in the frick is he talking about right now?
No one, no one tuned in for this shite. STFU dumb shite.
No one, no one tuned in for this shite. STFU dumb shite.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:08 am to Simplemaaan
There was probably shenanigans going on and if that’s what put Biden over the top who knows, but you guys are being duped by the my pillow guy. He doesn’t have shite and is doing all of this to keep the faithful believers tuned into him, then I’m sure is gonna scam one way or another. Y’all got unhinged from reality over the past few years
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:08 am to VoxDawg
Read the WashTimes piece & was halfway through when I stopped & went to the last paragraph for the truth.
So predictable it’s insane, the media is the devil.
So predictable it’s insane, the media is the devil.
Posted on 8/12/21 at 10:09 am to EA6B
quote:
the only thing that would have made them less credible is if they were written in crayon.
So, lock them up. The fine and jail sentence for filing a fraudulent affidavit is steep.
Short it ahole.
Page 89 of 106
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News