re: Official Parler Free Speech Platfom Thread - **Updated w/ Curated Follow Recommendations**

Is it accurate to say the guy in the green shirt, left 8chan because of the violence and shootings associated with the site? How do you know Jim Watkins (right) a pig farmer that lives in the Philippines, that used to run a porn site...Isn't pulling ya'll's chain on his new server that is not DOD. 8kun is using a Russian web hosting service.

LINK

False flags or not, this guy is shady AF, no?

I signed on this week and was surprised by that the Sporting News and a number of other mainstream sports outlets were on it. I actually like it much better than Twitter.

Mock all you want. No one takes you seriously, anyway.

Why would today be different?

For all we know, it could turn out that Q himself was a black hat.

I'm trusting the plan, though.

Just signed up. Hopefully, unlike the blue-haired Nazi's who run Twitter, I can speak up for somebody like the Covington High School kids without being permanently banned. #GFYJackDorsey.

I'll say one thing, though. The Left may not be able to meme, but I swear their social media platforms are the most user-friendly. Parler seems okay, but I'm still a little confused after being on it for about 20 minutes.

Added Ted Cruz to OP

I just signed up & didn’t have to provide a DL

quote:

---

I just signed up & didn’t have to provide a DL

---

That's only for the Verified accounts

quote:

---

Only an idiot would send that information to a social media website.

---

quote:

---

That's only for the Verified accounts

---

Which is people that already use their real names on the platform.

The Federalist: Twitter's 2020 Election Interference Will Eventually Result in Banning Trump

quote:

---

It seems clear now that Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey is going to ban President Donald Trump. It’s just a matter of when.

Dorsey will come up with a pretext, however absurd or cynical, as part of Twitter’s ongoing efforts to interfere in the 2020 election. It will probably consist of a charge that Trump has had one too many violations of some entirely subjective and impossible-to-define Twitter policy on abusive or harmful speech.

We got another preview of what that might look like this week when Twitter once again appended a warning label to a Trump tweet that apparently violated Twitter’s policy against “abusive behavior.” What did Trump say that was abusive? He said there would never be an “autonomous zone” in the nation’s capital, and that any mob trying to take over D.C. streets would be met with “serious force.”

In other words, the president promised to enforce the law. That was considered “abusive” by Twitter.

The irony is that the president’s tweet was in reference to a group of people who were actually engaged in abusive behavior. Trump sent the tweet after a mob vandalized St. John’s Episcopal Church and tried to pull down a statue of former President Andrew Jackson in Lafayette Square Monday night. Twitter justified the warning label by citing its policy against abusive behavior, which prohibits “the targeted harassment of someone” or inciting other people to harass someone.

---