Started By
Message

re: Ocasio Cortez is on twitter right now calling shapiro a sexist for wanting to debate her

Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:41 pm to
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:41 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 3:37 am
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:43 pm to
Nah he just wants to piss you off
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:43 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 3:37 am
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:43 pm to
Right wingers consistently want to debate. Left wingers consistently do everything they can to avoid it.

That alone tells you everything you need to know.

The entire left wing ideology is built on an emotional house of cards. These people spend their whole lives hiding from information or arguments they don't agree with.
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

She can't go away soon enough.


She's the best thing that every happened to Republicans from a PR stand point.

She's this new celebrated "hero" of the left, despite the fact she's accomplished absolutely nothing and despite the fact she's completely ignorant and disastrous on every issue.

her being the new face of Democrats is a great thing.
Posted by Suck Out West
Phoenix, AZ
Member since Dec 2006
5932 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:51 pm to
She is being destroyed on Twitter.
Posted by EyeTwentyNole
Member since Mar 2015
4199 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:52 pm to
Ocasio Cortez Valdez just wants attention. I don't think she actually believed people were gullible enough for it to go this far. Now she's out on an island where she actually has to discuss more than the 3 talking points she memorized at the beginning.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
18799 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

Candace "MOAB" Owens reply


She’s not too bright either. She’s a dark skinned mouthpiece like OC, pretty nice to look at, but when it comes down to articulating the meat and bones of economic policy, judicial policy, and other more complicated topics she doesn’t have the chops.

Also, she face planted on rogans podcast when it came to global warming.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25593 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:07 pm to
I will have to check out the Rogan podcast.

I like her. But Owens is too emotional. It is a liability even outside of debates. She gets emotional just having a conversation. And that is a liability.

Maybe it is her youth. And she will learn to control it as she matures.
Posted by 225bred
COYS
Member since Jun 2011
20386 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

Also, she face planted on rogans podcast when it came to global warming.




lol, no one gives a frick about global warming. go vote Jill Stein.

If you can't see the big picture and the good Candace Owens is doing for the Right, then you're clueless, no offense.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44017 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:14 pm to
It’s often said tongue-in-cheek, but I’d literally pay to see that debate.
She’d be in the fetal position within minutes.
Savagery.
I’m wincing, just thinking about it.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
18799 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:14 pm to
quote:

I like her. But Owens is too emotional. It is a liability even outside of debates. She gets emotional just having a conversation. And that is a liability.



yeah, i've noticed that as well. i don't mind being emotional when you know what you're talking about. but when you get emotional over some shite you don't even understand, then you need to stfu, go sit down and read.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

I don't think she actually believed people were gullible enough for it to go this far.


No. She’s dumb enough to believe she’s smart enough. She has zero idea how much she doesn’t know.
Posted by Masterag
'Round Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
18799 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

lol, no one gives a frick about global warming. go vote Jill Stein.



that's unfortunate. just because you find it inconvenient to think about doesn't make it untrue.

quote:

If you can't see the big picture and the good Candace Owens is doing for the Right, then you're clueless, no offense.



i'm not clueless, and i see the success she's having in the short term. but what about the long term, when she is exposed for her lack of subject matter knowledge? or, maybe I'm giving people too much credit and there are so few thoughtful people that it doesn't actually matter. i'm not sure.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78480 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:35 pm to
There is no more perfect representation for Progressivism and it’s almost impossible vacuousness than this truly clueless woman . She is exactly who Democrats deserve . An utter phony to match their utter phoniness.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57172 posts
Posted on 8/9/18 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

compares debating ben shapiro to being catcalled
Posted by 225bred
COYS
Member since Jun 2011
20386 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 12:03 am to
quote:

that's unfortunate. just because you find it inconvenient to think about doesn't make it untrue.



Global warming will never ever be a deciding factor in US elections.

quote:

i'm not clueless, and i see the success she's having in the short term. but what about the long term, when she is exposed for her lack of subject matter knowledge? or, maybe I'm giving people too much credit and there are so few thoughtful people that it doesn't actually matter. i'm not sure.



Examples of lack of subject matter, besides global warming (which is a theory) ?
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81594 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 1:45 am to
I’m going to get hammered but I kind of see her point.

I mean when Lawrence O’Donnell was taunting Michelle Bachman every night and clearly implying she was stupid it wasn’t the best look.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 3:32 am to
quote:

I’m going to get hammered but I kind of see her point.


So what’s her point?

Why can men on the left praise her and call her up to come on their talkshows, but as soon as a conservative male asks her to debate its “catcalling”?

Would she say the same thing if Bill Mahr (Sp?) tweeted “I love what you are doing, you should come on the show so we can discuss your views” would she say that’s a cat call? Because that’s even more in line with the true definition of a catcall. Not criticizing someone.

Her response seems childish and feeble
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 3:34 am
Posted by mofungoo
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
4583 posts
Posted on 8/10/18 at 5:07 am to
quote:

This space cadet is going to be the source of many laughs for years to come.

Well, she's qualified. When she went to school she took up space

MAGA
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 5:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram