- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Obama’s judge rule McGhan must testify before Congress
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:06 pm
quote:
The ruling Monday by U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is a major victory for House Democrats, who have faced resistance from the White House using the same "absolute immunity" argument to stymie McGahn from testifying to prevent other former officials from speaking out against President Trump in the impeachment case.
LINK
If he wants, now he can testify. Same thing with Bolton.
13
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:07 pm to Northwestern tiger
Another activist tyrant in black robes.
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:08 pm to Northwestern tiger
Too bad there aren't any higher courts...
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:08 pm to Northwestern tiger
This will be appealed.
You guys need to learn about how these court cases work.
It will be caught in for months with appeals.
This Particular judge has had ALL her previous rulings overturned on appeal
You guys need to learn about how these court cases work.
It will be caught in for months with appeals.
This Particular judge has had ALL her previous rulings overturned on appeal
This post was edited on 11/25/19 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:09 pm to Northwestern tiger
Weird all these activist judges seem to be nominated by the same 2 ppl
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:10 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Weird all these activist judges seem to be nominated by the same 2 ppl
Chief Justice Roberts thinks this is pure coincidence.
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:11 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I know it will be appealed, but if McGhan really want to testify, he can do it now before the appeal.
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:12 pm to Northwestern tiger
Liberals are still pushing Muh Russia
HONK HONK
HONK HONK
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:15 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
I know it will be appealed, but if McGhan really want to testify, he can do it now before the appeal.
The administration would get an emergency stay if that were to happen.
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:17 pm to Northwestern tiger
So in this judges eyes there isn't attorney client privilege? Or no executive privilege?
Hmmmm
Hmmmm
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:18 pm to udtiger
quote:
Too bad there aren't any higher courts...
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:21 pm to Northwestern tiger
I’m thinking this judge needs to produce a valid birth certificate..asap!
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:21 pm to Northwestern tiger
When is congress back in session? Next week? A lot can happen in a week.
This post was edited on 11/25/19 at 5:22 pm
Posted on 11/25/19 at 5:39 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:Those still exist. The Admin was trying to claim that there was an "absolute immunity" that the President could declare for certain people.
So in this judges eyes there isn't attorney client privilege? Or no executive privilege?
Hmmmm
Posted on 11/25/19 at 6:16 pm to mmcgrath
Did Obama give immunity to all those that had info on him?
Posted on 11/25/19 at 8:24 pm to Northwestern tiger
Let him testify. Who cares. Trump did nothing wrong. Witch hunt continues.
Posted on 11/25/19 at 8:26 pm to Northwestern tiger
District court? Who fricking cares?
Posted on 11/25/19 at 10:18 pm to Northwestern tiger
The last thing the Democrats want is Don McGahn to testify.....plus as White House Counsel there are things he did in aan attorney / client capacity for the office of the President that he is precluded from disclosing if he wants to keep his law license
He is allowed to say " Ok, but if you do that it would be illegal" and if his client follows the advice, both attorney and client are in the clear, forget intent.
He is allowed to say " Ok, but if you do that it would be illegal" and if his client follows the advice, both attorney and client are in the clear, forget intent.
Posted on 11/26/19 at 6:05 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
You guys need to learn about how these court cases work.
Somehow I knew this one judges opinion was not the final opinion. In the bigger scheme, the legislative branch is working to diminish the power of the executive branch. These sorts of cases are going up the line and will likely make it to the Supremes as a separation of power issue. This stuff is not insignificant. And all these black robes went to law school. What is taught in law school?
Posted on 11/26/19 at 6:15 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Even the name is a cliche.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News