- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYT: Far-Right Groups Are Behind Most US Terrorist Attacks
Posted on 10/25/20 at 9:59 am
Posted on 10/25/20 at 9:59 am
All the news that’s fit to print
They get to define “far-right” and “terrorist attack”.
Again, the NYT feels it’s their responsibility to defend the left by attacking the right.
They get to define “far-right” and “terrorist attack”.
Again, the NYT feels it’s their responsibility to defend the left by attacking the right.
This post was edited on 10/25/20 at 10:01 am
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:00 am to TheHarahanian
Would love to see what they call ‘far-right’
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:00 am to TheHarahanian
So radical Islam is far right?
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:02 am to TheHarahanian
Well, when you pander to violent retards that support fricking kids, what do you expect them to do?
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:03 am to TheHarahanian
i mean it's good that islamicist terror attacks have almost disappeared under Trump, right?
SOMEBODY is going to fill that gap
*ETA: that study found FIVE fatal attacks in the US this year. FIVE
SOMEBODY is going to fill that gap
*ETA: that study found FIVE fatal attacks in the US this year. FIVE
quote:
There were some encouraging signs. The number of fatalities from domestic terrorism has been relatively low so far this year, compared with some periods of U.S. history.
Five fatalities were caused by domestic terrorism in the first eight months of this year, compared with the past five years, in which total fatalities ranged from 22 people to 66.
This post was edited on 10/25/20 at 10:06 am
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Of the five fatal attacks this year, the report attributed one in Portland, Ore., to an activist affiliated with the loose far-left movement known as “antifa”; one in Austin, Texas, to a man described as a “far-right extremist”; one in New Jersey to an “anti-feminist”; and two in California to a man linked to the so-called Boogaloo movement, an anti-government group whose members seek to exploit public unrest to incite a race war.
Fatal attack in Austin, Texas???
Are they referring to the guy in his car that shot the rioter after the rioter pointed a rifle at him?
That’s what they’re calling an attack by a right winger?
fricking clown world
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:16 am to TheHarahanian
How much damage and how many lives have BLM/Antifa cost compared to "far right groups" in the last six months?
This is why the media has zero credibility.
This is why the media has zero credibility.
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
*ETA: that study found FIVE fatal attacks in the US this year. FIVE
That’s fake news, blm has killed way more than that.
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:18 am to TheHarahanian
They know there are a lot of people out there who will vote for Trump because they don’t like the rioting and looting. This is basically late-game damage control.
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:19 am to Redbonebandit
Islam is about as far right as you can get. At least socially.
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:21 am to TheHarahanian
quote:
NYT: Far-Right Groups Are Behind Most US Terrorist Attacks
I wonder how many idiots are falling for this complete and total bullshite?
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:23 am to KCT
So desperate trying to take the attention away from the far left
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:26 am to TheHarahanian
This last week will be nothing but a full frontal assault on the senses by the Media. Truth and facts be damned.
Posted on 10/25/20 at 10:53 am to TheHarahanian
What a BS article.. the bias is astounding. So let’s do some simple arithmetic...
Antifa is all white but they aren’t labeled white supremacists because they are anti-America. The Proud Boys are a diverse group but labeled white supremacists because they are pro-America. Notice the NYTimes didn’t name any white supremacist group. Could anyone name ONE? Trump asked at a debate to name one but Chrissy Wallace couldn’t and Biden said the Proud Boys, who aren’t. This article is simply running cover for the radical left.
So apparently that is ok.. and self described non-partisan my arse. People like Andy Ngo being beaten and others being surrounded and dragged out of their car and beaten, aren’t examples apparently. Or Trump supporters all over America being attacked for a hat, shirt or sign.
They claim Trump refuses to condemn the Proud Boys and white supremacy, although the Proud Boys aren’t white supremacits and Trump has denounced white supremacy a billion times but Biden saying Antifa is just an idea is totally fine, who are instigating all the destruction and violence. The media is the enemy of the people and it couldn’t be more obvious nowadays.
Trump hasn’t bailed out those who get arrested for causing mayhem, the left has. Trump hasn’t released those who were arrested for causing mayhem, like Democrat Mayors and DA’s have. Trump hasn’t encouraged and called for mayhem, the left has. The Right hasn’t threatened that there will be civil unrest if the election doesn’t go their way, the left has.
The reason they can’t define Far-Right is because anything Pro-America to them has to be labeled Far-Right or White Supremacy for the cause, even though we all know that is the case and they can’t simply say it.
Antifa is all white but they aren’t labeled white supremacists because they are anti-America. The Proud Boys are a diverse group but labeled white supremacists because they are pro-America. Notice the NYTimes didn’t name any white supremacist group. Could anyone name ONE? Trump asked at a debate to name one but Chrissy Wallace couldn’t and Biden said the Proud Boys, who aren’t. This article is simply running cover for the radical left.
quote:
The report by C.S.I.S., which describes itself as a nonpartisan center, found that far-left extremists most frequently targeted law enforcement, military and government facilities and personnel.
So apparently that is ok.. and self described non-partisan my arse. People like Andy Ngo being beaten and others being surrounded and dragged out of their car and beaten, aren’t examples apparently. Or Trump supporters all over America being attacked for a hat, shirt or sign.
quote:
The report highlighted several cases, including fatal shootings related to protests and the F.B.I.’s arrest of 13 men accused of plotting to kidnap the governor of Michigan, a Democrat. Those cases, along with President Trump’s denunciations of left-wing activists and his refusal at a presidential debate to condemn an extremist right-wing group, have repeatedly raised fears this year of politically motivated violence.
They claim Trump refuses to condemn the Proud Boys and white supremacy, although the Proud Boys aren’t white supremacits and Trump has denounced white supremacy a billion times but Biden saying Antifa is just an idea is totally fine, who are instigating all the destruction and violence. The media is the enemy of the people and it couldn’t be more obvious nowadays.
Trump hasn’t bailed out those who get arrested for causing mayhem, the left has. Trump hasn’t released those who were arrested for causing mayhem, like Democrat Mayors and DA’s have. Trump hasn’t encouraged and called for mayhem, the left has. The Right hasn’t threatened that there will be civil unrest if the election doesn’t go their way, the left has.
The reason they can’t define Far-Right is because anything Pro-America to them has to be labeled Far-Right or White Supremacy for the cause, even though we all know that is the case and they can’t simply say it.
This post was edited on 10/25/20 at 10:57 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News