re: NYC passes law: $250,000 fine for saying “illegal alien” outloud

quote:

---

It is almost as if you clowns are INCAPABLE of examining facts, rather than being good little cheerleaders and chanting the approved mantras.

FFS , I am AGREEING with you, and you STILL find something to bitch about ... because I am not agreeing loudly enough

---

No dipshit, you are intimating that there is some possible way that making it illegal to utter words some group deems offensive, may not be a violation of the First Amendment. I guess nobody should be surprised coming from you, but it’s just another ridiculous assertion.

It's still hard for me to believe sometimes that the progressives are going along with bullshite like this. This flies right in the face of everything a true liberal used to believe in. I guess they are willing to sacrifice their most deeply held beliefs for the chance at power, which is disgusting beyond the pale.

Jesus Christ Hank

You've been in rare stupid troll form lately.

Sheesh

quote:

---

Why not just quote what it does say? Why play the coy game with cheerleaders. Just drop the boom!

---

He's hanging his hat on the idea that it MIGHT be constitutional because it says you can't use the words when motivated by hate...……….

Good luck defending yourself in court when they argue that you used the term because you hate and you try and say nuh uh.

Sheesh Hank has been doing some dancing on pin heads lately

Have YOU read the ordinances, Shorty? Unlike the other dimwits, I would not expect YOU to express an opinion without doing so.

quote:

---

Have you read the ordinance?

Obviously not, because that is simply not what it says.

---

Careful, AggieCrank. My town has passed an ordinance, fining you $250,000 for telling someone they are speaking without knowing the facts.

quote:

---

Have YOU read the ordinances, Shorty?

---

Yes. I did.

And they're brazenly unconstitutional.

Yeah. I know that OP didn't characterize it perfectly. But your pretense is equally bullshite

quote:

---

He's hanging his hat on the idea that it MIGHT be constitutional because it says you can't use the words when motivated by hate...……….

Good luck defending yourself in court when they argue that you used the term because you hate and you try and say nuh uh.

Sheesh Hank has been doing some dancing on pin heads lately

---

Yeah, I never said ANY of that. I simply said that the memo is more-clearly a constitutional violation than the actual ordinances.

You people are absolutely, obsessively delusional.

Free Speech... Progressives and Libs hate it.

quote:

---

itNo, Shorty, “trolling” is trying to drag me into an argument in which I would argue the merits of a position that I have never taken.

---

You said the actual ordinance was POSSIBLY unconstitutional.

That's a position. Defend it. Or, shut the frick up and stop trolling.

quote:

---

I think that the memo is worse than the ordinances. I think that the memo goes far beyond the bounds of the ordinances. Period.

---

Yes. But, that's not why you were being given shite.

Both the memo and the ordinance are unconstitutional.

Frankly, once you get past the point of unconstitutional, I'm not really of a mind to think how far you went past that point to be terribly relevant unless you're trying to play the "hey, look, I'm smart" game in a thread