Started By
Message

re: NYC passes law: $250,000 fine for saying “illegal alien” outloud

Posted on 9/29/19 at 7:20 pm to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/29/19 at 7:20 pm to
quote:


Shorty, try not to be so disingenuous. I’ve answered the question three times

Lie

quote:


The ordinances in question are essentially very generic protected class statutes
false

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/29/19 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

quote:

The ordinances in question are essentially very generic protected class statutes
false
Are you looking at Title 8 of the New York city municipal code? I linked it earlier. It is a very, VERY generic protected class ordinance.

If you’re talking about some different statute or ordinance, link or copy it.
quote:

Have any of you three taken the time to find and read the ordinances themselves, as opposed to the 29-page memo from de Blasio regarding the manner in which he wants to see it enforced? Or (worse yet) only the talking points.
This post was edited on 9/29/19 at 9:14 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/29/19 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

quote:

Shorty, try not to be so disingenuous. I’ve answered the question three times
Lie
I was wrong. I had already answered the question FOUR times, not just three.

12:52pm. I have no idea whether I found every ordinance that de Blasio references in his memo, but the ones I have seen are pretty generic “protected class” pabulum.

01:13pm. ordinances are fairly-generic, public accommodation, protected-class pabulum

01:29pm. ordinances could “quite possibly be construed as constitutional“ because, again, the ordinances are fairly generic public-accommodation pabulum

01:32pm. the Supreme Court has repeatedly addressed the question of public accommodation laws and protected classes

this whole thing is yet another example of this board acting like the children’s game of telephone.

The memo was broader than the ordinances. The article was broader than the memo. And the hysterical mob on this forum is interpreting even that article more broadly than it was written. All exactly as I described in my very first post.

And no amount of reasonable discussion seems able to get the discussion back on track, though Troy DID finally seem to grasp the basic concept, because he finally switched to “I just do not care what SCOTUS says.”

Hank out.
This post was edited on 9/29/19 at 8:12 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 9/30/19 at 8:10 am to
Shorty, did I (or did I not) answer the question FOUR times before your claim I did not answer it at all?
This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 8:24 am
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram