re: Nunes releases 5 page point by point rebuttal

quote:

---

Nunes is a liar trying to cover up for traitors.

---

This is a malicious lie. about par for the course from you.

quote:

---

Can we agree that THE MEMO was a complete bust? It was supposed to end the Russia investigation and everything! [/quote

Certainly Shiff's memo was a blank. Didn't even address the most important conclusions from Nunes.

It was less instructive than even I expected - nothing more than the talking points he has been spewing for months.

[quote]Instead, Mueller's integrity and efficiency have been confirmed since then by the many indictments he has issued that have resulted in numerous guilty pleas.

---

And not one of them relates to 'collusion with Russia."

Wonder how many indictments he could rack up by surveilling a few of Clinton's corrupt cohorts for a year or so?

Now, I still think that Mueller must have some information that none of us know about - or else, if he is an honorable man, he would called this witch hunt off by now. Of course he has loaded up his team with die-hard Clinton loyalists, many with very sketchy records on ethical standards. So he may not be as honorable as we now think.

Certainly none of the 'indictments' and 'guilty pleas' mean a thing relative to the Trump/Russia 'collusion' allegation.

But - rejoice at the dog whistle.

The Shift memo was a big disappointment for you - wasn't it? You know you were disappointed = as in = "Is THIS all you got???? All that bluster, and you dump THIS??????? "

at your faux bravado.

quote:

---

You can repeat the same fricking lie however many times you want, you have no credibility

---

It's laughable that Nunes rebuttal at least twice relies on the Sen. Grassley and Graham’s criminal referral -- which is not even an official document - and carries ZERO weight.

That is unbelievable. Nunes is admitting his original memo cannot stand on its own.

quote:

---

It's laughable that Nunes rebuttal at least twice relies on the Sen. Grassley and Graham’s criminal referral -- which is not even an official document - and carries ZERO weight.

---

Yep... and as if Grassley and Graham are not partisans prone to partisan spin.

And Schiff is above all that?

Lol

And, oh, by the way... Devin Nunes leaked classified information, and several Trump aides have access to classified information without proper clearances.

And here you all were so OUTRAGED, OUTRAGED, I tell you, that Hillary Clinton had unintentional, incidental classified information, though not technically nor legally classified, on her server.

quote:

---

It's over as far as Trump is concerned. He's in the clear.

---

He knows better than that.

Every person with the Trump campaign lied about the Trump Jr. meeting with the Russian lawyer in Trump Tower.

Then Trump wrote Jr. response to the accusations about the meeting, and lied about it again. Trump also lied about the fact that he knew the people that arranged the meeting.

How is Trump in the clear?

She had SCI information that had the headers removed but still had the paragraph markers.

Someone had to cross domain that stuff manually.

quote:

---

Holyshit people really believe Trump will be implicated in this.

---

It was Trump, himself, who ignited this special counsel by firing James Comey and then confessing to Lester Holt that he did it in order to stop any investigation into his Russia connections.

As I've said, I don't believe Mueller will actually indict Trump. He will report to Congress and to the public numerous crimes that Trump has committed over the years and then let Congress handle it under public scrutiny.

quote:

---

Instead, Mueller's integrity and efficiency have been confirmed since then by the many indictments he has issued

---

With not a single one having anything to do with russia.

I would bet my life savings that if you conducted an investigation on anyone in DC with no bounds you will find something illegal.