re: Nunes releases 5 page point by point rebuttal

quote:

---

McCabe said probable cause depended upon the dossier, so...

---

That's not even what the Memo said that McCabe said in his testimony. Nunes said that McCabe's testimony was that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.

But, Nunes admitted that McCabe never said it in those words, and what Nunes wrote in the Memo was Nunes OWN summary of several parts of McCabe's testimony.

When the Democrats contested what the Memo said about McCabe's testimony, Nunes said he would release the McCabe testimony transcript to prove what McCabe said. Nunes has not even attempted to release the transcript.

Does that sound suspicious to you?

I’m trying to tell you, if there were portion marks, then there would have been headers on the original document. They removed the header (which would have been set at the highest level of portion marks) but didn’t remove all of the portion marks.

quote:

---

What sucks for Schiff is I had no idea his tard memo was even released.

---

I'm sure he will be heartbroken to hear that.

quote:

---

Can we agree that THE MEMO was a complete bust? It was supposed to end the Russia investigation and everything!

---

Only if you're a completely f*cking demented and deranged and filthy f*cking hack. Otherwise, the MEMO was a bombshell that will eventually send several deep state SCUMBAGS to prison when the IG's report comes out.

quote:

---

Can we agree it is a fact that the DNC/Hillary campaign colluded with Russia in order to get dirt on Trump and the Trump campaign and that the Dums' memo does not dispute that fact?

---

And sHitlary LIED about not knowing the source of the dossier for almost a year and only confessed when Perkins Coie couldn't quash a subpoena of its banking records. At that point she realized that she would have to explain a $12 million payment that she ILLEGALLY called "attorney's fees" on her campaign finance filings.

quote:

---

I’m trying to tell you, if there were portion marks, then there would have been headers on the original document.

---

Go back and read what I said.

quote:

---

But you have an ignoramus like Rex who thinks he's smarter than everyone trying to explain classified documents to people who have actually handled classified info.

---

I'm not trying to explain classified documents, liar.

I'm telling you what Comey reported and did not report.

NEVER did he say that headers were removed. NEVER did he say that headers were missing. He had a perfect opportunity to say either of those things if that had been the case. What he DID say was that some classified info information within the body of documents were not properly marked. In other words, they HAD headers but were not properly marked as CLASSIFIED in the headers. Understand now, twit?

quote:

---

When the Democrats contested what the Memo said about McCabe's testimony, Nunes said he would release the McCabe testimony transcript to prove what McCabe said. Nunes has not even attempted to release the transcript.

---

Is it not strange to you that the Democrat memo didn't even bother to claim Nunes' statement about McCabe was false? They mentioned McCabe nowhere.

quote:

---

Nope. She paid Fusion GPS to gather information on Trump, as was her perfect legal right.

---

So, tell us Lil Rexy -- why did she lie about that for almost a year and only admitted to funding it when Perkins Coie couldn't quash a subpoena of its banking records?


AND, why did she ILLEGALLY call the $12 million dollar payment "attorney's fees" on her campaign finance filings when EVEN YOU'RE ADMITTING NOW she knew that Perkins Coie was just the middle man and were not performing legal work?