- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nunes confirms that Trump tweet appears to have been accurate
Posted on 3/22/17 at 4:45 pm to RobbBobb
Posted on 3/22/17 at 4:45 pm to RobbBobb
quote:Let's me get this straight.
No he said Trump had no chance in hell to win.
I don't know + possibility = Confirms Trump likely right
30% chance of winning = No chance in hell
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 4:47 pm
0
Posted on 3/22/17 at 4:49 pm to RobbBobb
That's not what he said, hell he clarified that he had seen nothing that remotely proves Trump's claim.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 4:49 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
It's scary how many things Trump has been right on.
It's the Art of the Deal. The dems actually think he plays off the cuff. This man is doesn't make a move without knowing the intended outcome.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 4:50 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
It's scary how many things Trump has been right on.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 4:51 pm to RobbBobb
This is why Lynch put out the blood in the streets video.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 5:57 pm to montanagator
quote:
he had seen nothing that remotely proves Trump's claim.
Are you an illegal immigrant?? Do you even speak the language
When point blank asked, does this confirm Trumps tweet, Nunes says "Its possible". That does not even come close to your ignorant rambling
Posted on 3/22/17 at 5:58 pm to montanagator
quote:
That's not what he said, hell he clarified that he had seen nothing that remotely proves Trump's claim.
liar
Posted on 3/22/17 at 5:59 pm to RobbBobb
It's amazing how dumb people on this board are willing to make themselves look in defense of Trump.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:15 pm to The Spleen
quote:
The Spleen
It's amazing how many posts have no added value in the issue and prefer to be ad hominem instead of address whether a sitting US President "nixoned" a Presidential candidate/in waiting...
And how many people don't see a problem with this...muh russians
Posted on 3/22/17 at 6:28 pm to IceTiger
There's little to address but the stupidity of people that think what Nunes said today somehow vindicates Trump and proves he was right.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 7:04 pm to IceTiger
quote:
It's amazing how many posts have no added value in the issue and prefer to be ad hominem instead of address whether a sitting US President "nixoned" a Presidential candidate/in waiting...
And how many people don't see a problem with this...muh russians
It's completely intellectual dishonesty.
Barking about Russian hacking or collusion despite zero evidence....then dismiss and deny everything that points to one administration spying on a rival campaign.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 8:36 pm to member12
Guess the democrats have nothing but muh Russia now
Posted on 3/22/17 at 8:37 pm to ChexMix
quote:
democrats have nothing but muh Russia now
They have anonymous sources.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 8:42 pm to RobbBobb
Should Nunes be prosecuted for his leak?
also
Given his own ties to the Putin regime, can Nunes be trusted?
also
Given his own ties to the Putin regime, can Nunes be trusted?
Posted on 3/22/17 at 8:52 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
“Details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in an intelligence community report,” he said.
Sounds like wiretapping to me
Posted on 3/22/17 at 10:33 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
But the irony is that when I said that 538 giving Trump a 30% chance of winning, you criticized them for being wrong
70% in favor of Hillary and then having Hillary lose is pretty bad.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 10:35 pm to member12
quote:
70% in favor of Hillary and then having Hillary lose is pretty bad.
I mean, it's probably about like a 5 pt dog winning a football game
Posted on 3/22/17 at 10:36 pm to member12
quote:It's a miss, although that's the only way one could conclude if the whole point is to base it off other's polling data.
70% in favor of Hillary and then having Hillary lose is pretty bad.
MY point is that RobbBobb is saying "it's possible" is confirmation that Trump's statements are likely accurate. Then on the flipside, he's saying that 30% means "no way in hell."
That doesn't make sense.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 10:57 pm to PaperTiger
Just says stuff. That's easy. When questioned, creates a diversion - brilliant.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:19 pm to Bristol Dawg
So let me get this straight-
The IC unintentionally tapped Trump transition team and then illegally unmasked the names and used Obama's new law to send the info to broader IC.
What stops this from happening right now?
The IC is tapping our President conversations and sharing them with name on it. Wtf? Whoever unmasked the names should go to jail
The IC unintentionally tapped Trump transition team and then illegally unmasked the names and used Obama's new law to send the info to broader IC.
What stops this from happening right now?
The IC is tapping our President conversations and sharing them with name on it. Wtf? Whoever unmasked the names should go to jail
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News