- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:24 pm to RobbBobb
quote:OK. Then make it tomorrow when it happens. Don't make up fake news about something that has or is occurring then.
The rest of the information comes out on Friday.
But more importantly, give me the lottery numbers, McFly.
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:25 pm to The_Duke
quote:
He said the info was sent to the WH. Now tell me, who lived there at the time?
How does that specifically imply that Obama tapped Trump? It doesn't.
Those damn White House servants are behind this, amiright?
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:25 pm to The_Duke
quote:
How does that specifically imply that Obama tapped Trump? It doesn't.
If it went to WH, Obama is on the hook. Sorry that is how it goes.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:26 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
Trump claimed the Obama administration surveilled his team. Has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Possible =/= beyond a reasonable doubt.
And that's a good thing. They don't jail everyone that possibly could've committed a crime.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:26 pm to bencoleman
quote:Like the "living, breathing" Constitution interpretations, and the left trying to change the meaning of language.
It's playing with words and a bunch of bull shite.
How progressive of you.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:27 pm to RobbBobb
In a wireless world "wiretap" means surveillance
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:28 pm to Goldrush25
quote:Well it explains why so many innocent people get sen to prison based on very flimsy evidence.
Possible =/= beyond a reasonable doubt.
quote:No, RobbBobb can sit on that Jury, and there are probably people far less logical than him.
And that's a good thing. They don't jail everyone that possibly could've committed a crime.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:28 pm to RobbBobb
OP What is it you peoples problem with reading comprehension? Nunes said no such thing and Bloomberg wrote no such thing.
Nunes was just on CNN and said this does not prove Trump's tweets correct
Seriously what the frick is y'all's problem. Are you allergic to the truth?
Nunes was just on CNN and said this does not prove Trump's tweets correct
Seriously what the frick is y'all's problem. Are you allergic to the truth?
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:28 pm to Rakim
quote:
In a wireless world "wiretap" means surveillance
In a post 1960 world, wiretap means surveillance.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:29 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
The intellectual dishonesty on this board
You are guilty of this Everytime you post.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:30 pm to bencoleman
If what Nunes says is true, Trump was communicating with persons of intelligence or criminal interest.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:32 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:You're doing it wrong.
Nunes was just on CNN and said this does not prove Trump's tweets correct
Trump said "my phones," but what he meant was any possible communication caught from anyone of the hundreds, if not thousands, of people working on his campaign, his transition, or in his administration.
Nunes said "I don't know" which confirms Trump, but it's irrelevant we expanding Trump's singular possessive to a slew of other people.
But if someone in that huge group is ever caught doing anything illegal, that now doesn't apply to Trump. It only applies when it benefits him.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:33 pm to Dwag4life
quote:Well it's irrelevant since Nunes didn't say TRUMP was communicating.
If what Nunes says is true, Trump was communicating with persons of intelligence or criminal interest.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:34 pm to buckeye_vol
Jesus fricking christ. He said it multiple times. If he meant my associates or employees he should've fricking said that.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:35 pm to fouldeliverer
quote:I agree. I was being sarcastic and using their ridiculous and fluid logic.
Jesus fricking christ. He said it multiple times. If he meant my associates or employees he should've fricking said that.
But I was told that I shouldn't expect specificity like you're arguing for in a tweet. Of course, that absolves him from using a method of communication that doesn't allow him to be specific when making serious accusations.
This post was edited on 3/22/17 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:36 pm to buckeye_vol
Dude, learn words
Nunes said that it is now possible that Trumps tweet was accurate.
So he now 'supports' that Trump is 'more likely' to be accurate. And youre working on a PhD?
quote:
confirm - to support or establish the certainty of something
quote:
appears - to be more likely or evident
Nunes said that it is now possible that Trumps tweet was accurate.
So he now 'supports' that Trump is 'more likely' to be accurate. And youre working on a PhD?
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:37 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
buckeye_vol
All I can think is that you enjoy being wrong and embarrassing yourself.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 3:37 pm to buckeye_vol
Sorry, it's hard to keep track of the loons and the reasonable people on here.
Popular
Back to top


2






