Dwag4life

Lets see what the fbi proves baw, who cares what people think?

The two things are not mutually exclusive, one can hope first and foremost to get a traitor/criminal removed from the most powerful position in the world, while also enjoying any political fallout that may come as a byproduct.

quote:

---

I hate the dems with a passion, this is ridiculous, hilary lies and cheats and now they're whining about how that info got released. Now we have this jerkoff comey saying trump associates colluded with russians but my question is if trump associates are found to be guilty of colluding, can donald be impeached for that? Im assuming no but someone please reassure me

---

If trump's approval drops below a certain point then the gop house will turn on him with the quickness to try to save their own asses. Even if he never got impeached his presidency would be so tainted by this that his power would be more worthless than obama's last 6 years

quote:

---

Every time Trump gets them on the ropes, they always come out with some new RUSSIANS! claim that inevitably turns out to be BS.

---

Nothing has been proven to be BS yet

If you believe what the WH and associates are spinning then you are a moron

Confirmation of this allegation?

In the meantime Schiff seems to have some new intel as well... LINK

BOOM motherfrickers

I'm quite happy that i can think independently, frick following a party propaganda line like the trumpkin cult of idiots

Nothing that Nunes said today confirms in anyway trumps accusational tweets, Nunes literally said that neither trump nor trump tower were illegally wiretapped

I don't think Nunes did himself or trump any favors today

If what Nunes says is true, Trump was communicating with persons of intelligence or criminal interest.

Mon: Nunes rants on camera about leaks of SCI

Wed: Nunes leaks SCI on camera, then briefs WH about the investigation OF THEM

Nunes is going to get fricked over this leaking

quote:

---

Because in practice you wouldn't direct it at a US citizen. If you are trying to do what the Obama admin likely attempted, which is cast a wide surveillance net under FISA in order to "incidentally" intercept communications from individuals involved with the Trump campaign, you would direct it at certain Russian interests that just so happened to be located in Trump Tower. The net is so wide that they "incidentally collect" communications from individuals related to Trump (See: Michael Flynn). Then leak the identities and "whoops, don't know how it got leaked but it came from valid surveillance." The toothpaste can't be put back in the bottle at that point, and the job is done.

---

Where's the proof that Obama had anything to do with this?

I'm fine with Pence as long as he's clean after being part of a shite-sandwich for 9 months or so. He seems like a reasonable, well adjusted, and normal human being, and a true conservative.

"Incidental collection" is not surveillance if you're not a SIGINT target.

It's not completely unheard of