re: NPR Uses The Term “Voter Restriction” Instead Of “Voter Identification”

I’ll go with voter protection.

Protects my vote from being cancelled out by someone not eligible to vote.

quote:

---

Cite that

---

BipartisanPolicy.org

BrennanCenter

quote:

---

The Heritage database includes only 41 cases involving noncitizens voting or attempting to vote.

---

Heritage Foundation
Heritage database contains about 33 cases of catch-all fraud per year on average (1465 total since 1979). Of those, less than 50 total are non-citizen voting cases.

To put this in perspective let’s do some examples with just all-case fraud:

TX 103 fraud cases / 107 million votes = 0.000096%

AZ fraud rate = 0.0000845%

Mail voting = 0.00006% of votes

quote:

---

I don’t need to convince anyone “concerned about spending” that cheers on spending hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars for Ukraine war (and wants more).

---

We aren’t sending Ukraine money. We are spending billions in the ME though.

I’m critical of the Russian apologists who are just realizing Russia and Iran are allies, solely because shite is funny.

Feel free to respond to those requested citations anytime Rohan.

quote:

---

They’ll probably get it again after November when the Democrats take over

---

Even if the D’s gain the majority in the House, they won’t get control of the Senate and Trump’s still there for two more years with a presidential veto at the ready anyway.

quote:

---

Heritage database contains about 33 cases of catch-all fraud per year on average (1465 total since 1979). Of those, less than 50 total are non-citizen voting cases.

---

Their numbers don't include the boxes of ballots found in the trunks of cars and other places that miraculously put the trailing candidate over the top.

It doesn't include any of the mass fraud that happened during 2020. It doesn't include any fraud where courts dismissed cases for no standing or flat out refused to allow evidence.

It doesn't include the cases that Barr intentionally refused to investigate.

It only includes individual cases of fraud actually prosecuted. Basically, it's useless.

You are asking us to not believe our own eyes and ears and instead to believe a database that may not even contain all the prosecuted cases, but certainly doesn't contain all cases of fraud in a system that doesn't want to reveal fraud.

You are asking us to be naive.

Voting should restricted to people who are not complete frick-ups. I’m ok with using the word “restriction”.

quote:

---

I need you to convince me

---

frick your own face.

This is an 80/20 issue. Get it passed.