- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Now that this debt ceiling agreement has passed, can Gaetz get McCarthy removed as SOH?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:25 am to mmcgrath
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:25 am to mmcgrath
quote:
If Gaetz and Boebert start a motion to remove McCarthy, does that deal go out the window?
If their motion fails, I imagine that prior deal doesn't exist, for all intents and purposes.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:28 am to moneyg
quote:
You think Gaetz lost partners yesterday.
There are no partners or friends, only allies to push agendas in Washedupton. Allies today won't be the allies of tomorrow.
Most people get it.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Jim Jordan, Gatez's nominee for SOH, was backed into a corner and had to accept the deal b/c of how badly MAGA/patriots fricked this up

It wasn't Gaetz group that negotiated this debacle. It was McCarthy's group. It was YOUR wing of the party. I know who voted for it and who didn't.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:30 am to moneyg
quote:
It wasn't Gaetz group that negotiated this debacle. It was McCarthy's group.
Gaet'z group didn't get to negotiate b/c they lost power.
McCarthy was able to lead negotiations b/c he gained power.
This isn't complicated. Did McCarthy's debt ceiling deal honor his agreement with Gatz? If not, can Gaetz do anything about it or has his power decreased?
quote:
It was YOUR wing of the party
I don't have a wing of a party.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What I want is irrelevant to this thread
You're such a little worm

This post was edited on 6/1/23 at 9:32 am
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:40 am to SirWinston
Reuters backs OP.
McCarthy's moment - debt ceiling vote secures Speaker's standing.
quote:
Kevin McCarthy earned his stripes as Republican speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday, navigating fierce hardline opposition to pass a debt ceiling bill containing federal spending limits that President Joe Biden for months vowed to resist.
Six months after he endured 15 humiliating floor votes just to be elected speaker, McCarthy proved capable of dragging Biden into negotiations over spending and other Republican priorities, and then marshalling two-thirds of his often fractious House Republican majority to enact bipartisan legislation.
"Keep underestimating us and we'll keep proving to the American public that we'll never give up," McCarthy told reporters after the vote.
The bill, approved by a 314-117 margin, lifts the government's $31.4 trillion debt ceiling in exchange for cutting non-defense discretionary spending and stiffening work requirements in assistance programs.
Yet it was a bruising victory for McCarthy. The bill gained 165 votes from Democrats, outnumbering the 149 from members of McCarthy's own Republican party.
quote:
"They said he would never become speaker, and of course they were wrong. They said he would never be able to manage the floor effectively and we haven't had a single bill fail," Johnson said in an interview. "They said he wouldn't be able to cut a deal with the president, and they were wrong about that."
McCarthy has so far succeeded in passing the bill without drawing direct verbal attacks from former President Donald Trump, who urged Republicans to push for a default if they were not able to extract sufficient concessions from Democrats.
Trump, who is seeking a return to the White House in 2024, had blasted top Senate Republican Mitch McConnell for agreeing to raise the debt ceiling during Biden's first year in office. McConnell largely stayed in the background during these talks, which began to move forward after Biden agreed to one-on-one negotiations on May 9.
Avoiding Trump's ire appears to have protected McCarthy's standing with Republican voters nationally, some 44% of whom told a Reuters/Ipsos poll in May that they approve of his job performance, notably higher than McConnell's 29% approval rate.
McCarthy's moment - debt ceiling vote secures Speaker's standing.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Gaet'z group didn't get to negotiate b/c they lost power.
McCarthy was able to lead negotiations b/c he gained power.
This isn't complicated. Did McCarthy's debt ceiling deal honor his agreement with Gatz? If not, can Gaetz do anything about it or has his power decreased?
Gaetz never had that power. The premise of your argument is false. Gaetz could lead a movement to replace McCarthy if he wanted. It may or may not succeed.
McCarthy led negotiations as SOH. That would have happened whether Gaetz took his stand or not.
Everyone knows the America First / Patriot wing of the party isn't in control. Meanwhile, Democrats had a HUGE win yesterday. Congrats?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:46 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
They said he would never be able to manage the floor effectively and we haven't had a single bill fail," Johnson said in an interview. "They said he wouldn't be able to cut a deal with the president, and they were wrong about that.
Because "bills" don't fail doesn't mean they are not failures.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's already here and it's fetishizing apocalyptic fantasies
If that's the case, I hope someone will find the Q decoder ring at the bottom of their Relief Factor bag.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:55 am to moneyg
quote:
It was YOUR wing of the party.
You’ve been on this board for 17 years. If you think SFP is aligned with McCarthy and his ilk your reading comprehension and critical thinking could use some work. Take a lap.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:02 am to tigercross
quote:
You’ve been on this board for 17 years. If you think SFP is aligned with McCarthy and his ilk your reading comprehension and critical thinking could use some work. Take a lap.
Then you've seen him go from left wing, to right wing, back to left wing.
He's sitting here blaming the few Republicans left who fought against this deal for the deal.
What do you think his point in this thread is?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:06 am to moneyg
quote:
What do you think his point in this thread is?
Asking an open question to generate discussion about the state of the Gaetz coalition and what that means going forward?
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This was NOT the sentiment when Gaetz hijacked the SOH process

quote:
What changed?
That's the point, nothing will, groomer.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:08 am to Knartfocker
quote:
Asking an open question to generate discussion about the state of the Gaetz coalition and what that means going forward?
It's still not strong enough to enact meaningful change despite being on the right side of almost every issue.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:10 am to moneyg
quote:
Then you've seen him go from left wing, to right wing, back to left wing.
The only correct label was leftwing, and that was so long ago kids born at the end of that era are now graduating from high school

The only people who have ever called me "right wing" are...Leftists

Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:12 am to moneyg
quote:
Gaetz never had that power.
Then MAGA/Patriots don't, either.
quote:
The premise of your argument is false.
It wasn't on this board when Gaetz allegedly cucked McCarthy
It's false now, obviously, b/c that movement had one small moment of victory that was extrapolated by Patriots into a larger movement that simply doesn't exist.
quote:
Everyone knows the America First / Patriot wing of the party isn't in control.
Nobody was arguing they were ever "in control". It's whether or not they had any real power/population in the first place.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:13 am to FATBOY TIGER
quote:
That's the point, nothing will, groomer.
Apocalypse fetish

Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The only correct label was leftwing, and that was so long ago kids born at the end of that era are now graduating from high school
The only people who have ever called me "right wing" are...Leftists
I really don't care what you personally pretend to be.
Gaetz knew who McCarthy was and took a stand. He didn't do that in order to make a side deal. He did it to try and prevent McCarthy from getting the speakership (long shot that failed) and to weaken him in attempt to better control him on important votes (like this one).
In the end, it wasn't enough.
Gaetz, those who were in his coalition for the SOH vote, plus another 50 voted against this debacle of a deal. 73 total.
The rest of the GOP voted for it.
And, the Speaker cut a deal with the minority leader instead of working with the fiscal hawks in his own party.
This doesn't weaken Gaetz. He'll probably have more of a coalition moving forward on issues. It just points out that his efforts are meaningless when the GOP is more interested in working with Democrats than its own party.
Posted on 6/1/23 at 10:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then MAGA/Patriots don't, either.
They never did you stupid frick...hence the anti-establishment movement.
quote:
It wasn't on this board when Gaetz allegedly cucked McCarthy
McCarthy won the speakership. It was embarrassing for him. He lives under the threat of being removed. But, in the end, he's speaker. You seem to be the only one who was under the assumption that Gaetz was in control. That's a false premise and probably the source of your confusion. It mirrors the majority of your strawman arguments. You build a weak strawman and argue against it. It almost never represents truth or accuracy.
quote:
It's false now, obviously, b/c that movement had one small moment of victory that was extrapolated by Patriots into a larger movement that simply doesn't exist.
Congrats on pointing out the wing of the party fighting against continued OVERspending (estimated 4T of unfunded spending in next 2 years with no cap), fighting against the debacle of the southern border, fighting against the corruption within the DOJ, FBI, etc. isn't as powerful as it needs to be...and then pretending you aren't for those things.
quote:
Nobody was arguing they were ever "in control"
You are using its inability to control the speaker as a premise for its death. It's a circular argument. Small anti-establishment group isn't as powerful as said establishment therefore it doesn't exist.
Popular
Back to top
