- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not a single one of you toe spreaders would have run into that school
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:37 pm to MileHighDraw
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:37 pm to MileHighDraw
quote:
Not a single one
quote:
I’m insinuating 99%
I hope you see my point and if I had to guess your 99% is at least double digits too high.
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:42 pm to MileHighDraw
quote:Speak for yourself you fricking pussy.
MileHighDraw
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:45 pm to MileHighDraw
How could anyone even think twice about going in with children at risk???
Posted on 5/26/22 at 11:58 pm to TheDeathValley
quote:Lord….
How could anyone even think twice about going in with children at risk???
Cop runs in, on edge because there’s a shooter involved. Sees movement and fires, killing a 9 year old.
Would that have been ok for you?
Take about 5 seconds and put yourself in their shoes. You’re going into a building you may not be that familiar with, where a stray shot from you is liable to kill some kid because you don’t have any idea what’s really going on. It’s a situation you’ve never trained for, and frankly you don’t know WTF to do.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 12:02 am to llfshoals
quote:
Sees movement and fires, killing a 9 year old.
If a cop fires at the first thing he sees moving then he shouldn't be a cop.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 12:11 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:You’re the one saying they should run in headlong with nothing resembling a plan in the hopes they won’t screw up.
If a cop fires at the first thing he sees moving then he shouldn't be a cop.
Pretty easy to say, but unless you’ve trained extensively in combat environment situations you couldn’t do it. And I sincerely doubt officers do a lot of that kind of ongoing training.
There’s a reason they bring in tactical units for things.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 12:17 am to llfshoals
quote:
You’re the one saying they should run in headlong with nothing resembling a plan in the hopes they won’t screw up.
You bet. It's better than wasting time formulating a plan while children are being shot up. What good is a plan if everyone is killed?
Posted on 5/27/22 at 5:03 am to Homesick Tiger
not a reply to anyone. But, LOL, a lot of folks got trolled by a scrawny little frick that couldn't beat up a fat 4 foot 10 year old at the Sonic. What are we doing here?
Posted on 5/27/22 at 5:52 am to MileHighDraw
COWARDS!
As a nation we should be ashamed. Just 60 years ago our grandfathers stormed the beaches of Normandy to save Europeans from a powerful and ruthless regime, and now we are too scared to save our own children from a mental midget with a gun. There is no excuse for this, every police officer at that scene who failed to act should be fired and forever banned from serving in law enforcement or security, they are a disgrace.
As a nation we should be ashamed. Just 60 years ago our grandfathers stormed the beaches of Normandy to save Europeans from a powerful and ruthless regime, and now we are too scared to save our own children from a mental midget with a gun. There is no excuse for this, every police officer at that scene who failed to act should be fired and forever banned from serving in law enforcement or security, they are a disgrace.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 6:27 am to MileHighDraw
quote:
A cops job isn’t to run into a building and die.
It kind of is in this particular scenario. They are trained to not die but it’s highly possible they will. And if it wasn’t their job then I’d bet the good citizens of Uvalde would rather spend their tax money on engineered security measures at the school as opposed to training personnel who won’t engage a situation such as this.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:12 am to MileHighDraw
quote:
have. On multiple occasions. But this thread isn’t about me.
F%cking liar!
We pay them, we give them unlimited training, especially w guns/weapons. We out them in $80k vehicles and clothe them with technology like body armor, shields, etc.
For a majority of their career, like 98%, they are danger free.
And yes, when a school full of small.kids is ambushed. I gdamn demand that they get in there and take the attention off of the children and take that risk!.
But to NOT go in, and on top of that, stop real men who want to go in, AND arrest them...is about as fricking cowardly of an act a human being can do.
Can upu imagine waking up today and putting on a cop uniform and acting like your going "protect and serve", if you are one of the fricking cowards who stood there while the kids were slaughtered?
You are the devil himself...please cease to live.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 7:13 am to Joe_Dirte
If you've ever been in a dire situation where you had to save someone's life, you assess the risk and quickly realize that saving the life is the priority.
There literally is no time for fear.
There literally is no time for fear.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 8:11 am to MileHighDraw
quote:Of course it is. You're a toe spreader.
I have. On multiple occasions. But this thread isn’t about me.
There were loads of unarmed parents willing to run into that school. The AR-armed, kevlar-protected cops prevented it. Running to the children's aid is the natural instinct for most adults, men or women.
The fact that you imagine otherwise does make this thread about you, and does in fact establish you as likely the only "toe-spreader" in the thread.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 8:27 am to HughsWorkPhone
quote:
1: If their children were in there? 2: If going in was literally their job? 3: If they were just a guy carrying in the area? 90% 33% 5% (if cops hadn’t already locked down scene)
#1 gets 100% for me even if it’s with nothing more than an ink pen held in the stab ready position
Posted on 5/27/22 at 8:30 am to MileHighDraw
For my kid, absolutely. For random kids if I would have had a gun yes. If I would not have had a gun for random kids then no.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 8:35 am to the LSUSaint
quote:
We pay them, we give them unlimited training, especially w guns/weapons. We out them in $80k vehicles and clothe them with technology like body armor, shields, etc.
Most officers fire their weapon 1 or 2 times a year to “qualify” in a sterile range with ear protection and safety glasses. Pretty shitty training for a police officer. The better ones at least go to the range and use their 100 rounds a month allotment. The serious ones enter competitions to train and build the skillset.
Posted on 5/27/22 at 1:51 pm to llfshoals
quote:
Cop runs in, on edge because there’s a shooter involved. Sees movement and fires, killing a 9 year old.
Not cop. COPS. 50+
And I wasn't talking about cops - the statement was "nobody would do that" to which several in this thread clearly said "frick yes I would"
Posted on 5/27/22 at 1:53 pm to llfshoals
quote:
It’s a situation you’ve never trained for, and frankly you don’t know WTF to do.
I can't speak for this community, but my wife's school (the whole school district to be clear) hosts the police department and SWAT team annually for an active shooter drill. They use dummy rounds, have actors, and it is incredible intense. They know the schools like the back of their hand.
Popular
Back to top
