- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Nola.com:Jeff Landry's campaign paid $485K+ to his own staffing firm in Gov Race
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:31 am
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:31 am
quote:
During his year-long campaign for Louisiana governor, Gov.-elect Jeff Landry funneled more than $500,000 from his campaign war chest and associated super PACs into a staffing company he owns, continuing an unusual arrangement that ensures the public does not know who he pays for campaign work.
Landry’s practice of cutting campaign checks to his own companies — an unorthodox campaign finance practice in Louisiana — stretches back to at least 2007. But it accelerated sharply during his run for governor through payments to a firm he owns called UST Staffing, according to a review of campaign finance records.
A Landry spokesperson declined to comment on the continued payments. His staff has defended them as legal, saying they're an efficient way to handle payroll and that they align with state ethics rules governing candidates' work with companies owned by themselves or relatives.
His campaign has paid UST Staffing a total of $732,039 since 2011. Almost all of that spending occurred in the past four years, a review of campaign finance records shows.
And more than $485,000 of that cash moved to UST after Landry officially entered the governor's race in October of 2022, the records show.
Landry’s super PAC, Cajun PAC II, has also paid more than $66,800 to UST Staffing since 2014 — about $25,000 of which moved during the governor’s race.
Landry's campaign finance reports describe the majority of expenses paid to UST Staffing as “payroll." A spokesperson said last year that the payments “encompass all costs, including the actual net paychecks paid to the employees.”
An investigation last year by this newspaper found that Landry is alone among statewide officials in using such a system. The ultimate effect is his fundraising reports do not show how many people work for his campaign or who they are.
Louisiana law broadly requires that politicians only spend campaign money on items related to running a campaign or holding office. But it’s silent on whether they may hire their own companies for those services.
Ethics experts have said the practice doesn't appear to violate any state laws. But some called it worrisome, saying a candidate using private donations in support of a business a they own could pose a conflict of interest.
It's been unclear in the past whether Landry directly profits from the payments.
He reported earning between $25,000 and $50,000 in income from UST in 2022, his ethics disclosures say. That's much less than Landry has earned from the company in the past; in 2020, UST earned him more than $200,000, his disclosures say.
Landry is the sole agent and officer of UST Staffing, which is a trade name for the company UST Environmental Services, according to Louisiana Secretary of State Business Records.
Landry "does not view his campaigns or political entities as profit centers,” his longtime political consultant, Brent Littlefield, said last year.
LINK
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:34 am to thejuiceisloose
So a campaign finance violation lol
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:37 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Jeff Landry's campaign
You mean Governor-elect Jeff Landry.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:38 am to thejuiceisloose
But he’s a Republican
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:39 am to thejuiceisloose
Why didn't you highlite the part that says that experts don't think this violates any state laws?
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:40 am to Sofaking2
Of course it’s a violation and investigated if a Republican does anything. Dems can funnel money from Ukraine and China and “there’s nothing to see here.”
Need to play by their rules.
Need to play by their rules.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:40 am to Sofaking2
quote:
So a campaign finance violation lol
quote:
Ethics experts have said the practice doesn't appear to violate any state laws.
Apparently not even that.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:42 am to Jimbeaux
Isn't that how all politicians get rich....
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:43 am to EST
quote:
Why didn't you highlite the part that says that experts don't think this violates any state laws?
It appears to be legal, I won't contest that but it is undoubtable shady as hell
How many cousins and brother in laws do you think are employed by this company?
This post was edited on 11/19/23 at 9:44 am
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:43 am to thejuiceisloose
Amazing how news outlets all of a sudden want to do investigative journalism when a Republican is in office.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:44 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
It appears to be legal, I won't contest that but it is undoubtable shady as hell
This excuse serves democrats well so why can’t the Republicans use it?
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:46 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
This excuse serves democrats well so why can’t the Republicans use it?
It shouldn't be allowed for anyone, but so far most in this thread have excused it.
If the Poli board didn't have double standards it would have no standards at all.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:51 am to thejuiceisloose
Thats gold coming from a libtard cheering on Drumpfs indictments
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:56 am to thejuiceisloose
The word is that Landry’s staffing firm has a ton of workers with what
could be called insufficient documentation, going back years through today.
could be called insufficient documentation, going back years through today.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 9:58 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
It shouldn't be allowed for anyone, but so far most in this thread have excused it.
This is a typical Groomer response.
The fact of the matter is that it IS allowed for democrats. Until I see democrats held accountable for all the shite they do that they keep accusing republicans of doing, I’m not going to give a shite when Republicans do it. Goose Gander
Posted on 11/19/23 at 10:05 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
It shouldn't be allowed for anyone, but so far most in this thread have excused it.
If the Poli board didn't have double standards it would have no standards at all.
The Bidens are neck deep in corruption.
Next thread I see you start on that topic will be the first.
Posted on 11/19/23 at 10:06 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Thats gold coming from a libtard cheering on Drumpfs indictments
GOLD JERRY GOLD!

Posted on 11/19/23 at 10:08 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
quote:
Why didn't you highlite the part that says that experts don't think this violates any state laws?
It appears to be legal, I won't contest that but it is undoubtable shady as hell
How many cousins and brother in laws do you think are employed by this company?
While is does reek of helping other family members cash in on big money politics rather than getting a real job, if we're going to hit Jeff on this, then we better get a long list going.
Bidens
Trumps
Landriues
Tauzins
Boustanys
Bush(es)
Clintons
Gaetzs
Pelosis
Kennedys
That list can go on forever, many with much more going on internally than the Landry family. How many of the above list is John Georges's rag going to call out?
This post was edited on 11/19/23 at 10:16 am
Popular
Back to top
