re: No one has done a better job of covering the "investigations' than Sundance and his team.

quote:

---

So, here's a quick question: what was the purpose of the Trump Tower meeting?

---

To get dirt on Hillary. That's what the Russian lawyer (that Loretta Lynch allowed in the country and probably worked for Fusion GPS) told Trump Jr. They were trying to entrap Trump's associates.

And don't be surprised that George Papadopulas was on the Fusion GPS payroll too.

quote:

---

Also, do you even know how an insurance policy works? It's not a plan for destruction, it's a safeguard in case something destructive happens.

---

Right and to the Hillary sycophants at the high levels of the IC that something destructive happening was Trump getting elected.

Let me quote it again:

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

"elected" = something destructive happens

quote:

---

Aside from all that, I find it quite comical that people such as yourself, who are so gungho on "investigating" Hillary Clinton to death, despite previous exhaustive investigations which found no nefarious intent, and despite no new evidence, and despite the fact that she's five years removed from any Federal office, want to quash an investigation into Russian collusion, despite mountains of smoke and evidence, despite guilty pleas, despite numerous proven public lies, despite its dangers to our democracy, etc, etc, etc.

---

HIllary was never properly investigated. She had too many people at high levels sweep her crimes under the rug. You know like changing investigative language from grossly negligent to careless when everyone knows the reason that was done; "negligent" is the legal standard not careless.

quote:

---

You are not Eisenhower's Republican Party... you are nothing but a gang of unAmerican liars who are willing to sacrifice American ethics and justice for power.

---

Projection much.

It was the Obama IC that tapped Trump's wires by lying to the FISA court to obtain a warrant.

Axios is ok.

At least they have actual sources.

quote:

---

He is a shining example of the type of partisan hacks Honest Bob employs.

---

Robert Mueller didn't hire Peter Strzok, liar, but sure got rid of him to avoid any appearance or actuality of prosecutorial prejudice against Trump.

And where do you get off attacking a combat hero who was appointed by George W. Bush and then was universally praised until he was appointed special counsel? Are you REALLY that far stuck up Trump's arse that you have to smear American heroes... as he does?

quote:

---

It was the Obama IC that tapped Trump's wires by lying to the FISA court to obtain a warrant.

---

Got any more comical bullshite?

quote:

---

Got any more comical bullshite?

---

Yeah unmasking for political purposes is fun!

quote:

---

You know like changing investigative language from grossly negligent to careless

---

Leave it to functionally illiterate dullards to spread Fox "News" narratives.

The rest of that draft clearly indicates that neither Comey nor anybody else found any legal reason... in fact, it was unanimous within the DOJ... to prosecute Hillary Clinton. The term "grossly negligent" was properly edited because it has legal implications that didn't fit the rest of the conclusions of the letter.

Can’t I just take it for what it’s worth ie unvetted information collected by a former British spymaster?

Cool

quote:

---

Can’t I just take it for what it’s worth ie unvetted information collected by a former British spymaster?

---

Much of it corroborated.

Isn't it interesting how a respected American ally is now a villain because he had the nerve to report bad things about Donald Trump?

quote:

---

The rest of that draft clearly indicates that neither Comey nor anybody else found any legal reason... in fact, it was unanimous within the DOJ... to prosecute Hillary Clinton. The term "grossly negligent" was properly edited because it has legal implications that didn't fit the rest of the conclusions of the letter.

---

Yeah, the email investigation is probably not worth pursuing. It’s too tainted by former and reassigned FBI and DOJ Clinton friends.

Might as well move on to other Clinton crimes. Like the pay to play crimes through the Clinton Foundation. At least we can have an objective investigation of that criminal racket now.