- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newt: an absolutely rigged election in 2020
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
If this was a courtroom, you’d be getting fricked up.
You’re losing.
Bad.
But by all means, continue.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:39 pm to FriendofBaruch
quote:
2020
Do you think that same fraud existed in 2024?
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:40 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
If this was a courtroom, you’d be getting fricked up.
You’re losing.
Bad.
But by all means, continue.
There has only been one slight use of evidence to counter my arguments. 19+ pages in.
I'm posting copious amounts of data/evidence. The most common tactic in response is ad homs (or straw man ad homs, at this point).
This post was edited on 6/3/25 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:40 pm to FriendofBaruch
an adjunct to the all out fraud in swing states - read the last prior post
it is intended to use easily faked balloting with the less easy theft of the swing states
posing afterward would be facilitated by this effortless portion of the charade
again, reread my post I have edited for clarity (excuse me for being in the middle of a gargantuan personal project) Here let me help you:
of course they matter they make the stack much taller, much more plausible during a theft:
quote:
so every single dem controlled state with COD-LOCKED election control was exceptionally goosed - put the 7 or 8 million fraudulent votes here with the main swing - illegal votes at about another 7 or 8 million fraudulent votes - and you have an election a foreign country could only dream of for taking control of the largest power on earth.
That would be termed, evidence of election fraud on a massive scale in these 15 or so states with an extra 15 million faked ballots; states freeing all adherence to those pesky bellweathers which failed at a 98% rate relative to 2024 as well as prior elections of the past 50 years.
You have to be blind to knowledge to say what you have said,
and
you see well; fitting my original quote (and those bellweathers are every bit as valid as any dem-marxist evidence presented in protest)
oy vey! Mayorkas, Blinken, Garland et al
and the "15 million fraudulent ballots" fits perfectly with observations...
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:41 pm to blueboxer1119
quote:
But by all means, continue.
I have no doubt that he will. Fascinating, sad, and admirable all at once.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
There has only been one slight use of evidence to counter my arguments
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:45 pm to High C
quote:
But by all means, continue.
---
I have no doubt that he will. Fascinating, sad, and admirable all at once

Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would they cheat at all in California in 2020? Let's just start there.
Why would rain be wet?
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:13 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Why would rain be wet?
They're not going to lose California, brother. Why would they need to cheat there for POTUS?
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
Did this happen or not?
quote:.
"What did the Democrats do? They said well you know what, we have a good idea. A few months before the election they said, yes, no signatures required, you don’t need signature comparisons, you don’t need a postal date and if the postal date is smudged, you are to count it anyway, oh and yes, even though election day ends on Tuesday at 8 p.m., we are going to extend it to 5 p.m. on Friday," he said. "They had no legal or constitutional basis for doing any of that." As a reminder, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro said President Trump would lose the state before a single vote was counted.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:21 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
They had no legal or constitutional basis for doing any of that.
There is a series of court cases that disagrees with this.
Nobody is arguing election rules didn't change for Covid-related reasons. These changes weren't partisan in nature. I argued in real time Trump should devote most of his resources to those efforts and not his preferred ground game.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think that same fraud existed in 2024?
Nope.
1. Trump knows how they did it and they knew Trump knew and was watching. I believe I hard in 2020 there were 4 lawyers working fraud. They had thousands at the ready in 2024.
2. COVID offered cover for a lot of it. Actual election laws were ignored and excused becuase of the pandemic even when legislatures did not change them.
The statiscal anaomoly of Biden's upward surge upon vote count resuming has been proven to be statiscally impossible.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
How is:
Covid related?
You are a tool.
quote:
no signatures required, you don’t need signature comparisons, you don’t need a postal date and if the postal date is smudged, you are to count it anyway, oh and yes, even though election day ends on Tuesday at 8 p.m., we are going to extend it to 5 p.m. on Friday,"
Covid related?
You are a tool.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 1:55 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Even if Trump would have won Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, he still would not have had enough electoral votes to win, though.

Posted on 6/3/25 at 3:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'd argue logically, the fear of being caught in Georgia would be much higher, especially due to the scrutiny, eyes watching, political system, etc.,
Did Trump win Georgia?
quote:
now have the opportunity to explain why California was some risky endeavor for pro-DEM cheating in 2024
The House of Reps says hello.
How many of those elections were called DAYS after the election.
Again…you are a tool.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 6:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Also, until the retardation of this board during the MAGA era, I was one of the more celebrated posters. Exponentially more upvotes to downvotes, so you're wrong on that analysis.
A deeper dive into your post history shows that’s not true.
So far in the year 2025 you were awarded 11,347,990 downvotes.
From 2023-2024 you averaged approximately 3,327,891 downvotes per month.
From 2022-2023 you were awarded 47,567.988 downvotes.
Extrapolating that over the life of your career here
AND
the fact that no one believes you were EVER liked; the hypothesis of you being closer to a billion downvotes is pretty solid.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 6:07 pm to Errerrerrwere
How’d you pull those numbers?
Posted on 6/3/25 at 7:39 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
How’d you pull those numbers?
I tabulated mine and I've got 12,444,263 upvotes and 22 downvotes.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:18 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
From 2023-2024 you averaged approximately 3,327,891 downvotes per month.
From 2022-2023 you were awarded 47,567.988 downvotes.
Extrapolating that over the life of your career here
quote:
lso, until the retardation of this board during the MAGA era,
why would you extrapolate from the very time period I said things got retarded on here?
quote:
the fact that no one believes you were EVER liked
They're dumb.
Popular
Back to top


2







