- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newt: an absolutely rigged election in 2020
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:05 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:05 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Instead you are ducking behind a court's unrelated finding regarding the plaintiff's filing.
quote:
We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit
I don't know how that's unrelated to the question being asked
1
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:05 am to Padme
They know it was rigged. Their go to is "prove it". It is disgusting that they know it was rigged, and act so smug. But, they are liberals....hate god, family, country, and are mentally unstable. It is what it is.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:06 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
Their go to is "prove it". It is disgusting
Yes, having evidence for claims/arguments in the age of conspiracy theory, to counter claims by the conspiracy theory folks, is "disgusting".
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What did Hunter's laptop have to do with Biden's re-election campaign? We already knew Hunter was a drug-addicted degen. We all knew that long before we had confirmation with the laptop.
Another poster already proved the laptop had an impact on voters. Your comment above chooses to ignore that the laptop also contained emails proving Hunter’s influence peddling, but of course that doesn’t fit your narrative.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:23 am to Free888
quote:
Another poster already proved the laptop had an impact on voters.
He did not. Keep reading.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What if I told you the DEMs did about as well in 2024 as 2020, outside of the most DEM-left areas?
I would say its much easier to harvest votes in urban centers (Dem-Left) than it is in rural areas (Center Right), so I wouldn't expect to to change much
Y-O-Y
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:26 am to The Cool No 9
quote:
This. Anyone who can't understand this is slow.
Don't confuse not understanding it with refusing to admit it.
Nobody really believes that people wearing masks and gloves taking pictures of piles of ballots being put into an unmonitored drop box is normal. Nobody's that fricking stupid, nor are they stupid enough to claim that the guy's grandma demanded proof of her ballot being delivered and it all has an innocent explanation. We all know what was going on. Some will admit it, some won't.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:The WI law was crystal clear. The Dane/Milwaukee breaches of it were both clear AND court recognized. The sole reason courts refused to intercede in spring of 2020 on behalf of the GOP is because, prior to the election, they said the GOP could not demonstrate harm.
I don't know how that's unrelated to the question being asked
The finding against the GOP was not a comment on the LAW, it was a comment on the technical merits of the case. The same is true of the finding you're addressing.
You know that.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:35 am to NC_Tigah
he only gets technical and persnikety about the law when it suits him.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:37 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:I couldn't care less about him getting "technical and persnikety about the law." But in this case he's refusing to address the law, just as the courts did.
he only gets technical and persnikety about the law when it suits him.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:44 am to NC_Tigah
that's my point. you'll get a legal colonoscopy on birthright citizenship one day, and an impossibly obtuse, emotional word pasta over the 2020 election the next.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:51 am to Padme
quote:there's no evidence of it, so it can't be investigated. Duh.
Heard him being interviewed by Halperin the other day, and Charlie Kirk just now, promoting his book about Trumps influence. He just said about 3 times that the 2020 election was rigged. This can’t be though, our resident genius assured me that the 2020 election was legit. Does Newt need to go to Lake Charles law school?
Is there anyone who actually believes that it wasn’t rigged? Or do they just keep up the lie, for… well I don’t know what for
quote:you just described the entirety of our judicial system.
he only gets technical and persnikety about the law when it suits him.
"words matter.... when I like what they say"
This post was edited on 6/3/25 at 8:53 am
Posted on 6/3/25 at 8:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is much more valuable than actual evidence, in your eyes
I get so tired of your pounding the table about 'evidence' - you have never presented a shred of "evidence" to support your pomposity here.
I don't care what kind of degree or experience you have - or don't have - but this is a message board where the ONLY 'coin of the realm' is the logic of what you present - and how it compares with the presumed 'public knowledge' based on more than casual attention to the real news. Where 'real' means more than just the latest talking points from the mainstream media or political campaign material.
For instance - on this board you have presented ZERO 'evidence' that the 2020 election was accurately decided . (not to be confused with 'official'=== Nobody is claiming that the 'powers that be' declared Biden to be POTUS even tho he actually received less electoral votes.
The next time you use "evidence" as your primary verbal weapon in any discussion here - you are duty bound to present your OWN "evidence" that supports your opinion.
OH - and it cannot be that "absence of evidence to the contrary" is an acceptable substitute. Because that is the underlying assumption of all the people you assail with YOUR 'lack of evidence' bullshite.
This is a discussion board - it only rewards simple truths, cogent observations, sane logic, and personal integrity.
YOU are not the JUDGE here, as much as that seems to be your personal opinion of your position - you are just another product of keyboard strokes, and the only thing that distinguishes your input from others is the logic and apparent truths that exist in the public domain.
Put up or shut up about 'evidence'
Posted on 6/3/25 at 9:01 am to i am dan
quote:
How does he say the election was rigged this time? He's said it's been rigged by the media before
There were shenanigans. mp doubt
Posted on 6/3/25 at 9:08 am to Padme
It is so infuriating that people still believe Joe Biden got 81 million votes
Posted on 6/3/25 at 9:48 am to TigerBaitOohHaHa
quote:
I would say its much easier to harvest votes in urban centers (Dem-Left) than it is in rural areas (Center Right), so I wouldn't expect to to change much
What? I said the DEMs losses were in the areas "much easier to harvest votes".
Posted on 6/3/25 at 9:50 am to Nonetheless
quote:
It is so infuriating that people still believe Joe Biden got 81 million votes
Again, my point above
quote:
What if I told you the DEMs did about as well in 2024 as 2020, outside of the most DEM-left areas?
The primary gap in the total votes were in areas like New York, California, Illinois, Colorado, etc. Blue areas.
That's about 2/3 of the difference in the Biden vote totals in 2020.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 9:51 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
you'll get a legal colonoscopy on birthright citizenship one day, and an impossibly obtuse, emotional word pasta over the 2020 election the next.
2 different discussions/cases get 2 different responses.
News at 11
Posted on 6/3/25 at 9:52 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:Pomposity isn't a problem. Hell, I deal with that all the time. Maybe it's less personally off putting because it's a quality I can return in spades.
your pomposity her
The problem is when folks get Decatur-ish, using foundational knowledge or education to argue against what they assuredly realize is truth. Contrarianism is one thing, duplicity is another entirely. The latter occurs when known facts are denied.
I could very easily convince many folks here that medical concepts I know to be false, are instead true. I'll never do that. Nor will I tolerate others doing it in their fields, pompous or not.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 9:53 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
For instance - on this board you have presented ZERO 'evidence' that the 2020 election was accurately decided .
That's not how burden of proof and evidence work, especially with this framing:
quote:
(not to be confused with 'official'=== Nobody is claiming that the 'powers that be' declared Biden to be POTUS even tho he actually received less electoral votes.
So you ask me for evidence and then make it impossible for me to give evidence. #Logic
Page 16 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News