Started By
Message

re: Newt: an absolutely rigged election in 2020

Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:55 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
150810 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:55 pm to
Here’s another bat flipper.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
131682 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Here is the answer to your questions
Negative.
Again, and I know you couldn't care less about facts as you've said, the FACTS here are indisputable.

The question I asked was not whether the WI SC skirted broken law d/t claims of "latches" (which under the circumstances were audacious btw).

The question I asked is "According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120759 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

Yet nothing, nada, zip.


Well, this isn’t true at all.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452727 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:57 pm to
quote:

If nothing is done investigating all this then we have our answer in my opinion.

By all accounts it's over and 2 state criminal investigations are still moving forward. We'll see if that holds true in the future as we move on, though.
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
47182 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

President Trump has full control over the DOJ. His subordinates were hand chosen by him, and there’s nothing. Not so much as a hint of an investigation.




Part of the deal for his being let back into the White House was to promise not to investigate the 2020 election.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
19837 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

Part of the deal for his being let back into the White House was to promise not to investigate the 2020 election.


This take gets an upvote.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452727 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"


quote:

We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit, and that laches bars relief on the remaining three categories of challenged ballots. The Campaignis not entitled to relief, and therefore does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452727 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Part of the deal for his being let back into the White House was to promise not to investigate the 2020 election.

Why would Trump make this deal? When did he make it? After Biden bowed out or before? A
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120759 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:03 pm to
The ruling makes the law. We get it.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452727 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

We get it.

NC doesn't, apparently.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
131682 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"

I will try again ... because there is absolutely zero question about the law, a law which the WI SC deliberately ignored.

"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452727 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

I will try again ... because there is absolutely zero question about the law, a law which the WI SC deliberately ignored.

"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"

See?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
131682 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

NC doesn't, apparently.
I don't think you understood the post you're responding to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
120759 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:06 pm to
We know that you think when someone wins a court case that truth is determined by the ruling.

Very few other people live their lives that way or think that way. And they are better people for it.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
13620 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:07 pm to
The election was rigged in plain sight. Anyone watching saw what happened with the Covid rule changes and mass mail in ballots. It’s not some big secret.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452727 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

We know that you think when someone wins a court case that truth is determined by the ruling.

The truth? No.

The legal standard? Yes.

quote:

Very few other people live their lives that way or think that way. And they are better people for it.

We're having a discussion about the legal process. Judicial rulings are important in that specific discussion.

You're trying to extrapolate that discussion into something else ("the truth")
Posted by Grumpy Nemesis
Member since Feb 2025
1231 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

NC_Tigah

The funny thing is I'm 99.9% certain that he knows fraud occurred and understands that the Democrats intentionally facilitated fraud the key word being intentionally. He's just arguing to argue because he thinks it makes him appear smart
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
47182 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

Why would Trump make this deal?



In order to get back into the White House. Notice they don't mind his saying the election was stolen they just don't want him doing anything to prove it.

quote:


When did he make it? After Biden bowed out or before?



Most likely around the time he defeated Ron in the primaries. They really had no choice but to go with him at that point but they still wanted some reassurances.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
131682 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

See?
You're embarrassing yourself.

Once again, disjoined from any "latches" ruling which enabled ignoring the concerns at hand ...

"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"


It is a black and white question which was already addressed in the state the previous spring.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452727 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

In order to get back into the White House.
\
He didn't have to make such a bad deal to get back in. That was the larger point.

quote:

Notice they don't mind his saying the election was stolen they just don't want him doing anything to prove it.

Puffery and Trump go together like peas and carrots.

quote:

Most likely around the time he defeated Ron in the primaries.

Pre- assassination? That doesn't make sense in the CT sphere.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 20
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 20Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram