- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Negative.
Here is the answer to your questions
Again, and I know you couldn't care less about facts as you've said, the FACTS here are indisputable.
The question I asked was not whether the WI SC skirted broken law d/t claims of "latches" (which under the circumstances were audacious btw).
The question I asked is "According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:57 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Yet nothing, nada, zip.
Well, this isn’t true at all.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:57 pm to roadGator
quote:
If nothing is done investigating all this then we have our answer in my opinion.
By all accounts it's over and 2 state criminal investigations are still moving forward. We'll see if that holds true in the future as we move on, though.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:58 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
President Trump has full control over the DOJ. His subordinates were hand chosen by him, and there’s nothing. Not so much as a hint of an investigation.
Part of the deal for his being let back into the White House was to promise not to investigate the 2020 election.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 5:59 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
Part of the deal for his being let back into the White House was to promise not to investigate the 2020 election.
This take gets an upvote.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
quote:
We conclude the challenge to indefinitely confined voter ballots is without merit, and that laches bars relief on the remaining three categories of challenged ballots. The Campaignis not entitled to relief, and therefore does not succeed in its effort to strike votes and alter the certified winner of the 2020 presidential election.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:02 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
Part of the deal for his being let back into the White House was to promise not to investigate the 2020 election.
Why would Trump make this deal? When did he make it? After Biden bowed out or before? A
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
The ruling makes the law. We get it.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
We get it.
NC doesn't, apparently.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I will try again ... because there is absolutely zero question about the law, a law which the WI SC deliberately ignored.
"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I will try again ... because there is absolutely zero question about the law, a law which the WI SC deliberately ignored.
"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
See?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I don't think you understood the post you're responding to
NC doesn't, apparently.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
We know that you think when someone wins a court case that truth is determined by the ruling.
Very few other people live their lives that way or think that way. And they are better people for it.
Very few other people live their lives that way or think that way. And they are better people for it.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:07 pm to Padme
The election was rigged in plain sight. Anyone watching saw what happened with the Covid rule changes and mass mail in ballots. It’s not some big secret.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:07 pm to the808bass
quote:
We know that you think when someone wins a court case that truth is determined by the ruling.
The truth? No.
The legal standard? Yes.
quote:
Very few other people live their lives that way or think that way. And they are better people for it.
We're having a discussion about the legal process. Judicial rulings are important in that specific discussion.
You're trying to extrapolate that discussion into something else ("the truth")
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:08 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
NC_Tigah
The funny thing is I'm 99.9% certain that he knows fraud occurred and understands that the Democrats intentionally facilitated fraud the key word being intentionally. He's just arguing to argue because he thinks it makes him appear smart
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would Trump make this deal?
In order to get back into the White House. Notice they don't mind his saying the election was stolen they just don't want him doing anything to prove it.
quote:
When did he make it? After Biden bowed out or before?
Most likely around the time he defeated Ron in the primaries. They really had no choice but to go with him at that point but they still wanted some reassurances.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You're embarrassing yourself.
See?
Once again, disjoined from any "latches" ruling which enabled ignoring the concerns at hand ...
"According to Wisconsin LAW, was the selective allowance of elective absentee ballots in Dane and Milwaukee Counties LEGAL?"
It is a black and white question which was already addressed in the state the previous spring.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 6:10 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:\
In order to get back into the White House.
He didn't have to make such a bad deal to get back in. That was the larger point.
quote:
Notice they don't mind his saying the election was stolen they just don't want him doing anything to prove it.
Puffery and Trump go together like peas and carrots.
quote:
Most likely around the time he defeated Ron in the primaries.
Pre- assassination? That doesn't make sense in the CT sphere.
Popular
Back to top
