- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Newsmax Host Suggests Ketanji Brown Jackson Leaked Draft
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:17 am
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:17 am
quote:
Newsmax host Grant Stinchfield suggested on Tuesday that future Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson may be responsible for the leak of a draft ruling that would dismantle abortion rights.
Jackson will be sworn in this summer after Justice Stephen Breyer retires. Stinchfield acknowledged that she’s not a justice yet. But he still posited that she may have hired clerks and they may have started work already. He has no evidence this is true; he’s nonetheless “sure” of it.
“I find it suspect that the first leak coming out of the Supreme Court in history comes shortly after Judge Jackson is confirmed,” Stinchfield said, as flagged by Media Matters for America’s Jason Campbell. “I want to know if her law clerks, who I am sure have already been hired, possibly even working at the high court already before her swearing in, have access to these draft decisions.”
LINK
18
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:18 am to saintforlife1
quote:
“I want to know if her law clerks, who I am sure have already been hired, possibly even working at the high court already before her swearing in, have access to these draft decisions.”
Good point.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:18 am to saintforlife1
With logic like that there's a 90% chance he posts here.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:19 am to saintforlife1
I said that exact thing to my wife.
She agreed.
She is smartest woman I know, so it must be true
She agreed.
She is smartest woman I know, so it must be true
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:19 am to saintforlife1
quote:
Stinchfield acknowledged that she’s not a justice yet. But he still posited that she may have hired clerks and they may have started work already. He has no evidence this is true; he’s nonetheless “sure” of it.
Jfc
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:20 am to saintforlife1
His job is to get clicks and viewers. He got both from you it appears.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:20 am to saintforlife1
quote:
He has no evidence this is true; he’s nonetheless “sure” of it.
He never said that.
Here is what he said:
“I want to know if her law clerks, who I am sure have already been hired,”
Fake news is fake.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:21 am to saintforlife1
quote:Does Grant present any evidence that either of these possibilities actually took place?
Stinchfield ... posited that she may have hired clerks and they may have started work already. He has no evidence this is true; he’s nonetheless “sure” of it.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:21 am to saintforlife1
She is an activist. Who knows, hope we find out.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:22 am to saintforlife1
If that turns out to be true, she will undoubtedly be the first Supreme Court justice to be impeached since 1804. And hopefully the first ever to be convicted and removed from the bench. A justice is appointed for life only "during good Behaviour."
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:24 am to saintforlife1
quote:
“I want to know if her law clerks, who I am sure have already been hired, possibly even working at the high court already before her swearing in, have access to these draft decisions.”
This is the important question. I would assume that the answer is no, which would end this speculation.
Having said that, if the answer somehow is yes (say through some loophole), then 100% it is a possibility.
Whichever justice's staff leaked this should be questioned and impeached.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:25 am to saintforlife1
quote:
Newsmax
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:25 am to momentoftruth87
quote:
hope we find out.
I am sure that the most trustworthy and least corrupt government in the history of the US will be able to lead an unbiased investigation and provide accurate results to the voters forthwith.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:26 am to saintforlife1
How would that be possible if she’s not even on the court yet?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:31 am to saintforlife1
Since it’s on the internet, it must be true. 
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:32 am to saintforlife1
quote:
“I find it suspect that the first leak coming out of the Supreme Court in history comes shortly after Judge Jackson is confirmed,
This is not the first leak in SC history.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:33 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Does Grant present any evidence that either of these possibilities actually took place?
It certainly does read like a NYT or WaPo hit piece on Trump, January 6, Matt Gaetz, etc. I concur with you on that.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:42 am to EasterEgg
quote:
If that turns out to be true, she will undoubtedly be the first Supreme Court justice to be impeached since 1804.
Quote of the then young Century, (commenting on Aaron Burr presiding over the Senate trial of Samuel Chase when Burr had killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel the previous July), "Ordinarily, the murderer is brought before the judge."
Posted on 5/4/22 at 11:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Does Grant present any evidence that either of these possibilities actually took place?
Did you ever present any evidence that the mccloskeys actually destroyed the gate to their community instead of the hoard of protestors?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 12:01 pm to saintforlife1
Jackson isn't even on the Court yet and isn't part of this decision. Breyer is still a judge on this case. Also, that opinion was drafted in February.
I would assume she is briefed up on this stuff but don't purport to understand how it works
I would assume she is briefed up on this stuff but don't purport to understand how it works
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News