- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New York State Just Legalized Abortion up to Birth
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:08 am to Tiger Ryno
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:08 am to Tiger Ryno
35 pages of melt.
This makes sense with all the talk about wanting to kill women from a majority of you.
quote:
Incels are members of an online subculture who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a state they describe as inceldom.
This makes sense with all the talk about wanting to kill women from a majority of you.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:10 am to NolakcbrTiger
FWIW, you made a beautiful decision.
I don't know what your family circumstances were at the time but my cousin got pregnant her senior year of high school. As a family her parents did not scold her or ostracize her in any way. In fact they immediately took the position that abortion is not an option and we will do everything to help support the new baby.
That decision was a tremendous blessing directly to her and the entire family. She went on to have four more kids and the daughter that she decided to not abort got married 20 years later and now has three kids.
I don't know what your family circumstances were at the time but my cousin got pregnant her senior year of high school. As a family her parents did not scold her or ostracize her in any way. In fact they immediately took the position that abortion is not an option and we will do everything to help support the new baby.
That decision was a tremendous blessing directly to her and the entire family. She went on to have four more kids and the daughter that she decided to not abort got married 20 years later and now has three kids.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:13 am to NolakcbrTiger
quote:
NolakcbrTiger
Thank you for sharing your experience. I applaud your sacrifice and honesty.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:15 am to CaptSpaulding
Congrats. I am glad you were able to have an adult discussion with your pcp and make an informed decision. These are the stories I like to hear.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:29 am to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:33 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:Now THAT is a melt.
all the talk about wanting to kill women from a majority of you
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:37 am to Robin Masters
The whole "viability" argument is bull s h I t.
Is a 6 month old viable? A 5 year old?
They don't work, cant live independently, and contribute nothing to society.
Should we kill them?
It's a lie straight from the pit of hell.
There will be a terrible price to pay.
Is a 6 month old viable? A 5 year old?
They don't work, cant live independently, and contribute nothing to society.
Should we kill them?
It's a lie straight from the pit of hell.
There will be a terrible price to pay.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:56 am to Robin Masters
Incel filth still melting that he isn't allowed to tell women what to do. If only it were that easy for you.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 9:59 am to ShreveportHog94
Pine Bluff all emotionally attached to injecting saline into a babies brain.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:01 am to NolakcbrTiger
quote:
The whole "viability" argument is bull s h I t. Is a 6 month old viable? A 5 year old? They don't work, cant live independently, and contribute nothing to society. Should we kill them? It's a lie straight from the pit of hell. There will be a terrible price to pay.
Exactly. They use that as a rationalization but it only fits a convenient definition and it falls apart when you apply the actual scope of what it takes to keep a baby alive. Like a newborn would survive on its own if no one fed it or kept it warm. Left on its own a newborn is no more viable than a 20 week old outside the womb, which is to say, they would be dead very soon, which is to say, both are unviable. And so if that is your standard then either babies can be killed will into their 5th or 6th birthday or that the viability argument is moot.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:04 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
This makes sense with all the talk about wanting to kill women from a majority of you.
Hmmmm....do you think Pro-Life women want women to die as well?
Are Pro-Life women secretly Misogynists?
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:06 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
...wanting to kill women from a majority of you.
This sort of disconnect proves that the Left have all become Sociopaths....
You do know there is medication and treatment for Sociopathy, correct?
Just get one of those doctors whose word you take as absolute and indisputable to help you on your way to being a better person....
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:07 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Incel filth still melting that he isn't allowed to tell women what to do. If only it were that easy for you.
Your white knighting for pregnant homocidal women is a strange cause but I’m sure it will pay off bigtime. Maybe you can make another baby to kill!
And if you are concerned with the rights of women, you will be devastated to learn that about half the babies aborted are actually female. Whoopsiedaisy!
And for the record if you are about to kill a full term baby then I don’t have a problem telling you what to do. That isn’t the Gotchya you think it is.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:07 am to Robin Masters
People are outraged on social media on this- I guess I've been avoiding it except for here recently until this morning. People that don't even talk politics normally are on tangents. TBH that should be a good thing - in that irate and disgusted way at least- for the republicans.
I am pro choice but I can't agree with this no matter if I do think it's a woman's right to choose.
I am pro choice but I can't agree with this no matter if I do think it's a woman's right to choose.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:08 am to GumboPot
quote:
That decision was a tremendous blessing directly to her and the entire family. She went on to have four more kids and the daughter that she decided to not abort got married 20 years later and now has three kids.
Hopefully they all vote against democrats!
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:10 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
This makes sense with all the talk about wanting to kill women from a majority of you.
Post where we claim we want to kill women. And not a "well, if you don't allow abortion, we claim that some women will die, therefore you want to kill women." An actual post where anyone said "You know, I really want to kill women."
You are one of the more ignorant posters on the board. But you DO stick by your depraved, sick opinions, I'll give you that.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:12 am to piggilicious
quote:
People are outraged on social media on this- I guess I've been avoiding it except for here recently until this morning. People that don't even talk politics normally are on tangents. TBH that should be a good thing - in that irate and disgusted way at least- for the republicans. I am pro choice but I can't agree with this no matter if I do think it's a woman's right to choose.
Right. And so my theory is that this isn’t a law intended to resolve a “need” but rather it was passed to drive a wedge and to create a threat against Roe vs Wade. This threat will make libs donate to their Superpacd and fill re-election campaign coffers. Only complete psychophants like the 24 yo Arkansas idiot from Shreveport believe it’s a practical application of a medical procedure that needs to be protected by law.
This post was edited on 1/24/19 at 10:14 am
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:16 am to RebelExpress38
Barbara Boxer said once that the right to life only began when the mother left the hospital with the baby. People were shocked but here we are basically within a small margin from this actually becoming reality.
What a sad sorry culture we live in now.
What a sad sorry culture we live in now.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:41 am to AUsteriskPride
it wouldn't violate their constitutional right to life certainly.
Posted on 1/24/19 at 10:50 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Now post the pic of the dead mother. If she isn't dead then that meme is a lie. We are waiting.
The law doesn’t say only “life of mother.” It also includes “health,” whatever that means. So no, the mother doesn’t have to be in life threatening danger to abort at any point, she just needs to be in “health” threat. So your attempt to conflate the two is idiotic because if they meant the same thing they wouldn’t have included both in the bill.
Popular
Back to top


4






