- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New libertarian talking point: “actually, only a minority of Iranians oppose the regime”
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:01 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:01 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
In fairness, opposing the regime has been pretty bad for one's health and the health of their families and friends. 
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:05 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Wait are you trying to pretend that prior to 1979 Iran was a thriving Islam enclave?. A Sunni enclave
Lol
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:15 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Wait are you trying to pretend that prior to 1979 Iran was a thriving Islam enclave?
Are you trying to redefine what "Islam" (I presume you meant "Muslim") means? Because Iran has been Muslim since the 7th century
quote:
A Sunni enclave
Iran became Shia in 1501
Wikipedia article to educate yourself
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:46 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
I am seeing many libertarians argue that the protests only reflect urban sentiments and that in rural areas of Iran, the people are very happy and supportive of the regime.
So dumb!
About a third of the country strongly supports the current regime. That doesnt mean the rest are organized in any meaningful way to fight and or willing to die to over throw it.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:51 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I'm a libertarian and follow several libertarian sites on social media.
The main theme seems to just be isolationism again, not going one way or the other. If anything, libertarians are acknowledging that the majority of people in Iran value their freedom more than progressives in America value theirs.
The main theme seems to just be isolationism again, not going one way or the other. If anything, libertarians are acknowledging that the majority of people in Iran value their freedom more than progressives in America value theirs.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
I think it is more incorrect than you are thinking. I think it will be even overwhelmingly wrong once the people don’t feel threatened from the current regime.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 2:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Wiki, seriously?
The Shia dominace ended in 1925
Again try to keep up
quote:
The Pahlavi Dynasty
From 1925 to 1979, Iran was ruled by the Pahlavi dynasty.
Reza Shah Pahlavi reduced the power of the clergy, centralized authority and introduced legal reforms influenced by Europe. He banned the hijab in 1936 and promoted Western dress. Religious courts lost control over education and law.
His son, Mohammad Reza Shah, continued these policies. The 1963 White Revolution introduced land reforms and women's suffrage. The state, not the clergy, controlled religious endowments.
Iran during this period can be described as hybrid-secular. Shia Islam remained the official religion under the 1906 constitution, but religious authorities were marginalized politically.
Like I said since 1979, the Shias were unleashed after being sidelined for half a decade. The majority is celebrating whether you accept it or not
quote:
After the Shah fled, the Islamic Republic of Iran was established. The new constitution enshrined Twelver Shiism as the state religion and introduced the concept of Velayat-e Faqih, Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist. The Supreme Leader, a senior cleric, became the highest authority.
Sharia law shaped legal and social life. Clergy dominated key institutions. Religious codes on dress and behaviour were enforced.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 2:43 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
The Shia dominace ended in 1925
No it didn't.
You're trying to redefine what "Shia" means.
As I said
quote:
Are you trying to redefine what "Islam" (I presume you meant "Muslim") means?
Thank you for proving my point in the most hilariously ignorant way
Reza Shah Pahlavi was a Shia Muslim
You're conflating being Muslim (specifically Shia Muslim) with all sorts of other things unrelated to religion (like secular society)
Posted on 3/6/26 at 2:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
SlowAyatollahPro putting in his work.
Posted on 3/7/26 at 6:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No it didn't.
You're trying to redefine what "Shia" means.
Just stop. Quit using Wiki as your source
Is NPR a good enough source to crush your Shia feels? Because you havent a clue about the nation. Youre out of your element counselor
quote:
In Shiite Islam, this has been known as Quietism. Shiite clerics by and large believed that politics was an imperfect practice, so it was better to look inward.
"They accepted the legitimacy of the rule of monarchs so long as they did not violate religious law, so long as they did not harm Shiism," says Vali Nasr, author of The Shia Revival, "and as long as they helped the preservation of the community. So it was not expected that government would be Islamic in a perfect sense. All that was necessary was for government to protect religion."
That arrangement began to crumble soon after World War I.
quote:
In Persia, Reza Pahlavi, a military officer, seized power in a coup in 1925 and declared himself shah. Pahlavi changed the name of the state to Iran and set about creating a secular government, much to the dismay of some of the Shiite clergy.
And in the 1930s, much to the dismay of the Great Powers, Shah Reza Pahlavi flirted with Nazi Germany.
Did you know that Iran is a translation of Aryan. As in Nazi Germany Aryans: the Nazis promoted this false notion that glorified the German people as members of the "Aryan race."
Your so-called dominant Shia culture left the nation, and went into exile
quote:
In exile, Khomeini developed his concept of what an Islamic state would be: a Shiite Islamic state, under the control of the clergy.
From exile, Ayatollah Khomeini emerged as the revolution's leader, and in early 1979, after the shah fled the country, Khomeini returned.
quote:
But most Sunni Muslims rejected the Iranian revolution as a model for their own societies. Saddam Hussein was most aggressive of all. In 1980, he ordered an invasion of Iran, to topple the Persians, as he dismissively called them, and to seize the Iranian oil fields.
This would further deepen the division between Sunnis and Shiites.
Popular
Back to top


0









