Started By
Message

re: New libertarian talking point: “actually, only a minority of Iranians oppose the regime”

Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:01 am to
Posted by Wildcat1996
Lexington, KY
Member since Jul 2020
10410 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:01 am to
In fairness, opposing the regime has been pretty bad for one's health and the health of their families and friends.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Wait are you trying to pretend that prior to 1979 Iran was a thriving Islam enclave?. A Sunni enclave


Lol
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Wait are you trying to pretend that prior to 1979 Iran was a thriving Islam enclave?


Are you trying to redefine what "Islam" (I presume you meant "Muslim") means? Because Iran has been Muslim since the 7th century

quote:

A Sunni enclave

Iran became Shia in 1501

Wikipedia article to educate yourself

Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9377 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

I am seeing many libertarians argue that the protests only reflect urban sentiments and that in rural areas of Iran, the people are very happy and supportive of the regime.


So dumb!


About a third of the country strongly supports the current regime. That doesnt mean the rest are organized in any meaningful way to fight and or willing to die to over throw it.
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3870 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:51 pm to
I'm a libertarian and follow several libertarian sites on social media.

The main theme seems to just be isolationism again, not going one way or the other. If anything, libertarians are acknowledging that the majority of people in Iran value their freedom more than progressives in America value theirs.
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108984 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 12:54 pm to
I think it is more incorrect than you are thinking. I think it will be even overwhelmingly wrong once the people don’t feel threatened from the current regime.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34286 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro

Wiki, seriously?

The Shia dominace ended in 1925

Again try to keep up
quote:

The Pahlavi Dynasty

From 1925 to 1979, Iran was ruled by the Pahlavi dynasty.

Reza Shah Pahlavi reduced the power of the clergy, centralized authority and introduced legal reforms influenced by Europe. He banned the hijab in 1936 and promoted Western dress. Religious courts lost control over education and law.

His son, Mohammad Reza Shah, continued these policies. The 1963 White Revolution introduced land reforms and women's suffrage. The state, not the clergy, controlled religious endowments.

Iran during this period can be described as hybrid-secular. Shia Islam remained the official religion under the 1906 constitution, but religious authorities were marginalized politically.

Like I said since 1979, the Shias were unleashed after being sidelined for half a decade. The majority is celebrating whether you accept it or not
quote:

After the Shah fled, the Islamic Republic of Iran was established. The new constitution enshrined Twelver Shiism as the state religion and introduced the concept of Velayat-e Faqih, Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist. The Supreme Leader, a senior cleric, became the highest authority.

Sharia law shaped legal and social life. Clergy dominated key institutions. Religious codes on dress and behaviour were enforced.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

The Shia dominace ended in 1925

No it didn't.

You're trying to redefine what "Shia" means.

As I said

quote:

Are you trying to redefine what "Islam" (I presume you meant "Muslim") means?


Thank you for proving my point in the most hilariously ignorant way

Reza Shah Pahlavi was a Shia Muslim



You're conflating being Muslim (specifically Shia Muslim) with all sorts of other things unrelated to religion (like secular society)
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90770 posts
Posted on 3/6/26 at 2:46 pm to
SlowAyatollahPro putting in his work.

Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34286 posts
Posted on 3/7/26 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

No it didn't.

You're trying to redefine what "Shia" means.

Just stop. Quit using Wiki as your source

Is NPR a good enough source to crush your Shia feels? Because you havent a clue about the nation. Youre out of your element counselor
quote:

In Shiite Islam, this has been known as Quietism. Shiite clerics by and large believed that politics was an imperfect practice, so it was better to look inward.

"They accepted the legitimacy of the rule of monarchs so long as they did not violate religious law, so long as they did not harm Shiism," says Vali Nasr, author of The Shia Revival, "and as long as they helped the preservation of the community. So it was not expected that government would be Islamic in a perfect sense. All that was necessary was for government to protect religion."

That arrangement began to crumble soon after World War I.

quote:

In Persia, Reza Pahlavi, a military officer, seized power in a coup in 1925 and declared himself shah. Pahlavi changed the name of the state to Iran and set about creating a secular government, much to the dismay of some of the Shiite clergy.

And in the 1930s, much to the dismay of the Great Powers, Shah Reza Pahlavi flirted with Nazi Germany.

Did you know that Iran is a translation of Aryan. As in Nazi Germany Aryans: the Nazis promoted this false notion that glorified the German people as members of the "Aryan race."

Your so-called dominant Shia culture left the nation, and went into exile
quote:

In exile, Khomeini developed his concept of what an Islamic state would be: a Shiite Islamic state, under the control of the clergy.

From exile, Ayatollah Khomeini emerged as the revolution's leader, and in early 1979, after the shah fled the country, Khomeini returned.

quote:

But most Sunni Muslims rejected the Iranian revolution as a model for their own societies. Saddam Hussein was most aggressive of all. In 1980, he ordered an invasion of Iran, to topple the Persians, as he dismissively called them, and to seize the Iranian oil fields.

This would further deepen the division between Sunnis and Shiites.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram