re: New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death

quote:

---

Your study stated you have to take ivermectin regularly for 12 weeks. I want you to take it for 12 weeks as indicated in the article and see what happens

---

FYI, there were over 2B (yes billion) scrips written for Ivermectin prior to the pandemic, with only 6 adverse reactions reported

SIX

Now do the mRNA vax on the VAERS system

RobbBobb.. These sheep are totally ignorant and hate facts. Don't even try.
These dumbasses are what actually needs to be purged from the good old USA.
fricking lemmings.

quote:

---

regularly for 12 weeks

---

quote:

---

scrips written

---

FFS.

The people I know that passed due to Covid all had co-morbidities, overweight, advanced COPD, elderly, etc. There were a few people in our community that passed that were young with, to my knowledge, no co-morbidities, but I can’t say that I personally knew them.

In general, if you’re reasonably healthy you’re fine vaccinated or not. Again, nobody I know has had significant adverse reactions to the vaccination or to ivermectin.

It’s a strange illness. The few people I know who have co-morbidities (including myself) and caught Covid did fine but then rarely a young person is severely affected (perhaps underlying unknown co-morbidity). It definitely attacks the neurological system- I had some symptoms of meningeal irritation/inflammation. Was also in a mental fog & slightly depressed for about a week afterwards.

As a side note - I have worked at several military bases the past couple of years. Saw an unusually high number of clots including in the dural sinuses, pelvic veins and extremities for a very young population following the Pfizer, Moderna & J n J vaccines

quote:

---

There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you

---

you should get someone to help clean up your soul for you

Studies are good! I like studies!

This study is better than their previous one in a number of ways, but it's still...odd. They made some 'interesting' choices that probably explain why it's published in a non peer-reviewed journal.

First, why are they excluding the 71,548 "intermediate use" prophylactic cases? What did the data tell them about these cases that made them not want to keep their n high by including them and/or doing a sub-analysis? They started with 113,844 subjects who were 18 or older and had not had a positive covid-19 diagnosis before 7/7/20, yet their final treatment cohort is 1/3 of that.

Second, why didn't they apply the same exclusionary rules to the controls? They started with 45,716 individuals who didn't take ivermectin, and that's what they ended with. Looks like a good way to juice your numbers if you know that middle subject group had more hospitalizations than the other two groups.

Also, notice this wasn't an RCT. Inclusion in the treatment group was predicated on visiting a clinic on your own to receive care. A quick scan doesn't show that they took into account differences that might make someone go to a clinic vs not, and how that could impact their risk of adverse outcomes from covid-19.


Have to run and see patients, but those are what stick out to me on a quick glance. It's good that they fixed a few of the glaring errors from their attempt last winter, hopefully they clean the rest up soon.

quote:

---

Havent you embarrassed yourself enough on here

---

Sociopaths have no concept of embarrassment.

I’ve had covid for a week and am finally getting over it. I’m a healthy middle aged male who works out 5 days a week and eats healthy. Haven’t been sick I’m years but this kicked my arse for a few days.

How do I go about getting ivermectin and hcq not for me but wife who now has it and in-laws? One has it and the other is fine but almost died from the original strain and was in hospital for weeks. I’d like to get him on this asap for preventative care.
Do I need a prescription for both?
Thanks in advance