Started By
Message

re: New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death

Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:27 am to
Posted by minister of truth
Somewhere new for 6-12 months
Member since May 2022
1889 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:27 am to
Yep
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63030 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Because malpractice is a breach of the standard of care, resulting in harm.

If they follow the protocol, whether there is harm is irrelevant.

This is drilled in their heads every day in medical school.

Once again, the legal community improving society.



I don't think that's the cause, although it's true. I'd say 95% really thought the vaccine was going to work, and were unable to adjust to the obvious realities that it wasn't working...and unable to re-evaluate the risk/reward scenario.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:31 am to
So a decrease in mortality from 0.3% to 0.03%?

Outstanding.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:32 am to
quote:

and were unable to adjust to the obvious realities that it wasn't working...and unable to re-evaluate the risk/reward scenario.


This was in large part due to the fact that they had just spent 12 months calling everyone an imbecile who didn’t worship the vaccine.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:34 am to
quote:

I won't stop taking this stuff


Curious, how much do you take per day?
Posted by tigafan4life
Member since Dec 2006
50981 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:48 am to
I used it and so did my two kids. Worked fine. Got a dr to prescribe to me too.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15011 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:53 am to
Here is proof of Ivermectin effectiveness IRL...

I am not vaxxed, I took Ivermectin, D, C, Zinc, and Quecertin throughout the pandemic.. Never got sick. Went to a wedding last January where I decided to not just do the weekly dose, but the exposure dose.. 50+ cases at the wedding including ALL at my table..
Except me.
Most all of them vaxxed.

My unvaxxed Sister just went to Spain for a work trip last week... All her counterparts came down with Covid after the trip.. But not her. No mask, no Vax just prophalactic Ivermectin and D, C, Zinc and Quecertin.
Both my 80+year old parents took it, never changed their lifestyle during Covid (Dad gotta have that Costco hotdog for lunch every week ), And both never got sick. Or, if they did, they didn't know it.
Ivermectin for the win.
Posted by TeaParty
Member since May 2022
935 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 7:54 am to
And no life long or life ending side effects.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:01 am to
Interesting although it is a little fishy that In the non ivermectin group of 283 people that 15 (5.3%) died

In the over 50yo group of 68 people, 14 of them died (20%)

We know that COVID mortality rate definitely isn’t 20% for over 50 and isn’t anywhere near 5.8% overall.

So what’s going on in this group that is causing so much death?

It’s not so much that ivermectin reduced death but that the group they compared it to had much higher death than anything we have seen.

The ivermectin group had a 0.7% chance of death. Which seems closer to the actual mortality rate of OG COVID
This post was edited on 9/1/22 at 8:02 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:03 am to
quote:

It’s not so much that ivermectin reduced death but that the group they compared it to had much higher death than anything we have seen.


They’re just recreating the Paxlovid trial for ivermectin. Give them some credit.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:03 am to
quote:

So a decrease in mortality from 0.3% to 0.03%? Outstanding.


Not in this study. The people who didn’t use ivermectin had a 5.3% chance of death. Does that sound accurate to you?
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19535 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:07 am to
I have been taking my horsey paste for over two years now. Doesn't taste great and the only side effects are my cravings for apples, my mane growing out and my frequent urge to trot through the meadow.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:09 am to
No. I love you bringing this to the board. It’s good info.

It’s weird that I didn’t see you bringing that critical acumen to molnupiravir or Paxlovid.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:13 am to
quote:

It’s weird that I didn’t see you bringing that critical acumen to molnupiravir or Paxlovid.


I gave my parents ivermectin when they had OG COVID. I’m not saying it doesn’t work but if I read the study and something stands out I have to mention it.

Post the study and I’ll read it. I haven’t really looked into paxlovid because I don’t really care about it. I’m not trying to treat COVID anymore. I’m sure that data is fricked as well but the pharma companies are more experienced in massaging the numbers

This post was edited on 9/1/22 at 8:14 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:17 am to
LINK

Here’s molnupiravir.

quote:

Molnupiravir met the prespecified superiority criterion at the time of the interim analysis; at day 29, the percentage of participants in the modified intention-to-treat population who had been hospitalized or had died was significantly lower in the molnupiravir group (7.3% [28 of 385 participants]) than in the placebo group (14.1% [53 of 377 participants), a treatment difference of -6.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -11.3 to -2.4; P=0.001).


Don’t ask what the endpoints were at day 30.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:19 am to
quote:

They’re just recreating the Paxlovid trial for ivermectin. Give them some credit.


That would be hilarious if they submitted a fake study that is essentially the same as Paxlovid results and let the left tear it to shreds before revealing it’s actually the paxlovid results
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:21 am to
That would be.

The James Lindsay of Pharma.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44416 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:23 am to
quote:

So, what we've learned is that the large percentage of doctors are basically robots. They aren't really practicing medicine. They aren't thinking critically trying to heal people. They ONLY follow protocol. That in itself is a major revelation to me.

We also learned that a large percentage cared more about protecting themselves from financial harm than opposing centralized medicine.

We also learned that most doctors believe that THEY should have more input into your care than you do.

Finally, like your example, we learned that these doctors, even good people who are smart, follow the boiled down literature almost like a religion. Most have lost all ability to actually evaluate what they are reading. I also know doctors (very good people, very smart people) who had their children vaccinated. They are at least as easy to manipulate as the general population.

You see it here. Doctors who are critical thinkers and who really practice medicine and who dig into the studies and literature pull their hair out arguing with other doctors who don't have that ability. The former are the doctors you want to have.



My doc WAS in a large internal medicine practice here in Bham. From day one, he recommended what ultimately became the FLCC COVID protocol. He never recommend the vax and it created a rift in the practice since the other docs disagreed. He ended up being forced out of his practice and going out on his own. Amazing what this has done to our country.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128778 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:26 am to
quote:

I also know doctors (very good people, very smart people) who had their children vaccinated. They are at least as easy to manipulate as the general population.


One of my daughter’s friend’s parent is a well-known pediatrician at the most respected hospital in St. Louis.

The parent made the 16-year-old daughter get a booster to go on a trip with us. And admitted it wouldn’t do anything really. Just made her get it to get it.
This post was edited on 9/1/22 at 8:27 am
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 9/1/22 at 8:27 am to
quote:

the difference between drs and God

God doesn't think he's a doctor

Doesn't take a lot of brains to be a doctor, contrary to popular belief. You can't be completely stupid, but you can come pretty close. Most of getting to be a doctor is being able to memorize your notes for your exams. Most of being a doctor is following instructions/recipes/simple algorithms. But because they're not smart enough to know the difference, they believe they are smart. These are the ones who believed the leftist/authoritarian lines because that's how they "know" the rest of their information - it's passed down to them from their authority figures.
Intelligent doctors (minus opportunistic ones) held the correct positions of either agnosticism or belief in efficacy from first-hand or other reliable sources.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram