- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Neverending Election 2022 Thread! Senate 50-49 D-R, House looking 222-213 R-D!
Posted on 11/10/22 at 9:59 am to MidWestGuy
Posted on 11/10/22 at 9:59 am to MidWestGuy
quote:
Yes, I used the assumption of holding the current % breakdown. If what you say comes to pass, Laxalt is toast :(
Don't feel bad. I did the same thing. Hell, I was thinking that Laxalt could even fall off some. Didn't realize almost all remaining were mail ins and that Clark has only 25% registered Republicans. As the earlier poster said, CCM getting 65% mail ins. By my math, she only needs around 58%. That would be underachieving for a Dem when it comes to mail ins.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 10:04 am to Vood
quote:
When that dump of votes that arrived early in the evening last night it was over. No way, you will ever change my mind that those votes were not only fraudulent, but completely fabricated once they knew how much they needed to win.
This calls for investigation and some undercover work Veritas style.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 10:09 am to CouldaShot79
quote:
Mass mail ins without an Election Day deadline and without an Election Day mail in ballot total is a steal. Want mail ins? Fine, but the total ballots mailed in should be accounted for by election night, even if they aren’t processed right away. Continuing to add to that number days after is irresponsible and suspicious at best.
I bet they didn't clean the voter rolls for people who have moved out of state, died, gone to prison, are not a citizen, or have a phantom address that is off the wall.
This post was edited on 11/10/22 at 10:48 am
Posted on 11/10/22 at 10:55 am to Tigerfan1274
These are tweets from 538
quote:
Maricopa County, Arizona, has between 400,000 and 410,000 ballots left to count, according to Yvonne Wingett Sanchez of the Washington Post and Brahm Resnik of KPNX-TV. The next update from the county will be between 5 p.m. and 8 p.m. local time.
quote:
Hobbs leads by 47,000 in Maricopa, and Kelly leads by 92,572. But in 2020, Arizona was one of the few states where Republicans gained on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday as more votes were counted.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 11:16 am to rt3
Reposted here because my thread didn't get any views:
Republicans dominated "generic ballot" in House races
Polling actually wasn't wrong, from a national perspective. Republicans did almost as well as during the tea party "wave" in 2010, on a percentage basis.
From Breitbart:
Republicans dominated "generic ballot" in House races
Polling actually wasn't wrong, from a national perspective. Republicans did almost as well as during the tea party "wave" in 2010, on a percentage basis.
From Breitbart:
quote:
Republicans have won nearly six million more votes nationwide in races for the House of Representatives, but have flipped relatively few seats, suggesting talk of a “red wave” may have anticipated the overall mood of the country but not the final result of the election.
According to the Cook Political Report, as of Thursday morning, November 10, Republicans have won 50,113,534 votes, or 52.3% of the vote, compared to 44,251,768, or 46.2% of the vote. Republicans lead by 6.1%, which is better than their average in “generic congressional ballot” polls, in which the party led by 2.5% in the final RealClearPolitics average before the election.
quote:
The mismatch between overall votes cast for Republicans and the actual result reflects the polarized nature of congressional maps. It also reflects the fact that Republican losses against many Democratic incumbents were very narrow. However, it could also suggest that Democrats ran a more effective campaign, concentrating resources where they were needed to defend their vulnerable positions.
In comparison, during the Tea Party “wave” election of 2010, in which Republicans won 63 seats, Republicans won 44,593,666 votes out of 86,784,957 cast, or 51.3%. Democrats won 38,854,459 votes, or 44.8%, meaning that the Republican margin of victory was 6.5%, similar to the margin thus far in 2022. However, the Republicans failed to win the Senate in that race, losing several key races.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 11:32 am to Auburn1968
quote:
This calls for investigation and some undercover work Veritas style.
Would be ignored and dismissed immediately.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 11:57 am to BengalOnTheBay
DDHQ calls Jahana Hayes (D) as winning reelection in CT-05 House race
By DDHQ's count... it's 210-192 GOP in the new House... GOP needs 8 more to officially gain the majority
GOP currently has a net of +7... which would be enough to switch the majority if no more races flip
By DDHQ's count... it's 210-192 GOP in the new House... GOP needs 8 more to officially gain the majority
GOP currently has a net of +7... which would be enough to switch the majority if no more races flip
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:00 pm to rt3
Denver Post tally showing Lauren Boebert has taken the lead in the CO-03 House race by ~400 votes
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:01 pm to BengalOnTheBay
quote:
Polling actually wasn't wrong, from a national perspective. Republicans did almost as well as during the tea party "wave" in 2010, on a percentage basis.
From Breitbart:
quote:
Republicans have won nearly six million more votes nationwide in races for the House of Representatives, but have flipped relatively few seats, suggesting talk of a “red wave” may have anticipated the overall mood of the country but not the final result of the election.
According to the Cook Political Report, as of Thursday morning, November 10, Republicans have won 50,113,534 votes, or 52.3% of the vote, compared to 44,251,768, or 46.2% of the vote. Republicans lead by 6.1%, which is better than their average in “generic congressional ballot” polls, in which the party led by 2.5% in the final RealClearPolitics average before the election.
quote:
The mismatch between overall votes cast for Republicans and the actual result reflects the polarized nature of congressional maps. It also reflects the fact that Republican losses against many Democratic incumbents were very narrow. However, it could also suggest that Democrats ran a more effective campaign, concentrating resources where they were needed to defend their vulnerable positions.
In comparison, during the Tea Party “wave” election of 2010, in which Republicans won 63 seats, Republicans won 44,593,666 votes out of 86,784,957 cast, or 51.3%. Democrats won 38,854,459 votes, or 44.8%, meaning that the Republican margin of victory was 6.5%, similar to the margin thus far in 2022. However, the Republicans failed to win the Senate in that race, losing several key races.
When the large votes still out in the West come in, you are looking at R+1 final. Which is inline with the competent polls. Unlike in previous election years, Republicans gerrymandered their seats to protect more of its members which this election that actually causes more Republican votes to be "wasted". In 2020 the close races broke almost all Republican, in 2022 the close races broke almost all Democrat.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:02 pm to rt3
I think 223 is still a possibility.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:05 pm to Sooner5030
Lake and Laxalt must have genuinely kicked some arse for it to take this long for the Dems to cheat them out of it
This post was edited on 11/10/22 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:21 pm to SoonerK
quote:
When the large votes still out in the West come in,
If votes are still "coming in" 48 hours after an election, they aren't legitimate.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:23 pm to Tigerfan1274
DDHQ shows Laxalt up in NV SEN by ~15,800 votes with 91% in
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:25 pm to BengalOnTheBay
quote:
If votes are still "coming in" 48 hours after an election, they aren't legitimate.
Well the laws in those states would disagree. If you were looking at data from top people, you would have known that this wasn't a wave year and it was going to be basically neutral. It's not a surprise if you knew what to look at.
This post was edited on 11/10/22 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:27 pm to SoonerK
quote:
Well the laws in those states would disagree.
I concur that some states have crafter their election laws around "legitimizing" illegal ballots.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:29 pm to SoonerK
So in terms of the Senate, is the steal on in NV where the Republican leads or in AZ where the Democrat leads? I gotta keep my conspiracy theories straight.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:30 pm to BengalOnTheBay
quote:
I concur that some states have crafter their election laws around "legitimizing" illegal ballots.
Some states allow for mailed ballots to be received days after the election as long as they were placed in the mailed on or before election day.
There's nothing nefarious about that process. Most polls and election operations are ran by bipartisan volunteers.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:34 pm to BallHawg10
In Nevada, they are still finding votes to count, in Arizona, all the votes are in, but they are taking forever to count them.
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:34 pm to SoonerK
Lake was on glen beck this late morning and said she and attorney general will win easy. But masters will go. Down to wire.
She said. The libs in charge slow roll the results on purpose, till the republican gets the lead, then they willass drop results
She said. The libs in charge slow roll the results on purpose, till the republican gets the lead, then they willass drop results
Posted on 11/10/22 at 12:35 pm to Sooner5030
quote:
There's nothing nefarious about that process.
Except when the postmaster tells employees to backdate the ballots like what happened in 2020 when the FBI psychologically waterboarded the whistleblower in attempts to get him to change his testimony which was recorded and leaked by said whistleblower
Popular
Back to top


2




