- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NBC apologizes for biology after Supreme Court Title IX ruling
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:05 am
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:05 am
NBC apologizes for biology after Supreme Court Title IX ruling
NBC’s Title IX disclaimer may have said more than the Supreme Court ruling itself.
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision upholding state laws that restrict girls’ and women’s sports to biological females was expected to ignite fierce political debate.
What many Americans probably didn’t expect was to see a national news network effectively issue a disclaimer before repeating the language used by the Supreme Court itself.
In a ruling involving challenges to laws in Idaho and West Virginia, the Court determined that states may separate athletic competition on the basis of biological sex without violating Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, emphasized the longstanding role of sex-based classifications in athletics and the state’s interest in protecting competitive fairness for female athletes.
The decision was immediately praised by advocates for women’s sports, including former NCAA swimmer Paula Scanlan and other athletes who have argued that biological differences matter in competition. Supporters called the ruling a major victory for Title IX and for the female athletes the law was originally designed to protect.
But while the legal battle may have reached a milestone, another battle quickly erupted in the media.
During NBC’s coverage of the decision, a reporter paused to tell viewers:
“Just a quick note here. The terms that we’re using here during our reporting, biological male, biological female, the high court put those terms in quotations in their decision and their dissent. But just so you know, we’re using those terms from the decision itself, biological male, biological female.”
LINK
NBC’s Title IX disclaimer may have said more than the Supreme Court ruling itself.
The Supreme Court’s landmark decision upholding state laws that restrict girls’ and women’s sports to biological females was expected to ignite fierce political debate.
What many Americans probably didn’t expect was to see a national news network effectively issue a disclaimer before repeating the language used by the Supreme Court itself.
In a ruling involving challenges to laws in Idaho and West Virginia, the Court determined that states may separate athletic competition on the basis of biological sex without violating Title IX or the Equal Protection Clause. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, emphasized the longstanding role of sex-based classifications in athletics and the state’s interest in protecting competitive fairness for female athletes.
The decision was immediately praised by advocates for women’s sports, including former NCAA swimmer Paula Scanlan and other athletes who have argued that biological differences matter in competition. Supporters called the ruling a major victory for Title IX and for the female athletes the law was originally designed to protect.
But while the legal battle may have reached a milestone, another battle quickly erupted in the media.
During NBC’s coverage of the decision, a reporter paused to tell viewers:
“Just a quick note here. The terms that we’re using here during our reporting, biological male, biological female, the high court put those terms in quotations in their decision and their dissent. But just so you know, we’re using those terms from the decision itself, biological male, biological female.”
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. LINK
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:07 am to djmed
quote:
biological male, biological female?
Is there anything else?
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:07 am to djmed
Our whole society is littered with limp wristed pu$$ies.
Weak men cause hard times. Prepare accordingly.
Weak men cause hard times. Prepare accordingly.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:08 am to djmed
Haven't we learned that it's a bad idea to placate to mentally ill people?
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:14 am to djmed
Honk honk.
Trans literally means identifying as the opposite of your biology. If you deny biology you're denying the existence of trans.
Trans literally means identifying as the opposite of your biology. If you deny biology you're denying the existence of trans.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:22 am to djmed
I like how Clarence Thomas dealt with it in his concurrence. Basically called BS on the whole trans narrative.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:24 am to djmed
"We're sorry about the facts of science."
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:33 am to djmed
“Those that can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
-Voltaire
-Voltaire
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:37 am to djmed
Did Justice “I’m not a Biologist” abstain from this ruling?
Posted on 7/2/26 at 11:42 am to Jack Daniel
For the most part, no, it's binary. But there are some strange in-between cases, like the South Africa runner Caster Semenya, who genuinely appears to be both due to a rare but well understood genetic disorder.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 12:02 pm to djmed
Forcing people to accept trans insanity is not about equality, 'tolerance' etc. It's about humiliation and obedience.
Never give an inch on this one. It's always been clown shite and it always will be.
Never give an inch on this one. It's always been clown shite and it always will be.
Popular
Back to top
9









