- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: National Security Adviser McMaster briefing on President Trump's conversation with Russian
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:33 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:33 pm to mmcgrath
quote:Doesn't counter it at all. If enough substantive information is provided that mature, capable intelligence services like Russia's and Iran's can narrow things down it can have a serious impact. That's why the classification and dissemination guidelines for information are so important.
The didn't disclose "military operations" and did not discuss intel "sources" or "methods". Doesn't counter the Washington Post story really.
0
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:34 pm to cajunangelle
Weren't half of you guys lobbying for McMaster to be fired like 3 days ago?
Besides, Trump could have threatened to fire him if he didn't lie to cover Trump's back- he already demanded a vow of personal loyalty from one senior IC official that we know of.
Besides, Trump could have threatened to fire him if he didn't lie to cover Trump's back- he already demanded a vow of personal loyalty from one senior IC official that we know of.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:34 pm to a want
quote:
I don't believe a word he says
Yet you believe everything the liberal version of Bretibart in WaPo says?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:35 pm to KCT
quote:
the next time an Obama/Clinton/Kerry get elected I will do everything I can to sabotage their presidency.
As opposed to open-armed cooperation that marked your behavior and attitude the last 8 years
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:38 pm to cajunangelle
I doubt it, but could this all be part of a plan to expose the bugging of the WH? The leaks, the tweet about tapes, and now this. I realize that bug sweeps are done daily, but the admin could intentionally leave the bugs in place, or realize that new ones are consistently being installed.
I know this is a reach, but at this point, I wouldn't expect anything less from our govt
Eta: How else are former officials getting so much intel?
I know this is a reach, but at this point, I wouldn't expect anything less from our govt
Eta: How else are former officials getting so much intel?
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:38 pm to montanagator
quote:
Besides, Trump could have threatened to fire him if he didn't lie to cover Trump's back
This keeps getting better. What other crackpot theories are y'all whipping up on DU?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:39 pm to cajunangelle
You can tell by the folks posting in these anonymously sourced articles by biased leftist propoganda rags threads and vote pattens they are hard as frick and melting hard. Like their every downvote legitimizes their claims. It is pathetic. Trump is your president and will not be impeached or otherwise removed.
America won.
America won.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:41 pm to Sentrius
The Wash Post can't be compared to Breitbart. If Breitbart or youngturks.com, type of blog media printed an exclusive breaking news story. It doesn't spread to every MSM news organization out there like this fake news story did in a matter of seconds.
Washington Post can lie and get caught many times, as they have-without ever posting a retraction- and yet tomorrow whatever story they break is gospel to the MSM and CNN types.
Imagine all the people in an airport that have no other choice to watch CNN. The MSM needs tarred and feathered at dawn; with McCain and the rest of the GOPe.
Washington Post can lie and get caught many times, as they have-without ever posting a retraction- and yet tomorrow whatever story they break is gospel to the MSM and CNN types.
Imagine all the people in an airport that have no other choice to watch CNN. The MSM needs tarred and feathered at dawn; with McCain and the rest of the GOPe.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:42 pm to GRTiger
quote:He said that the story "as reported" is false. Big difference. You can nitpick part of the story and say that even if the rest is true.
What about the part where he said "the WaPo story is false?"
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:42 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Doesn't counter the Washington Post story really.
bullshite
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:43 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
He said that the story "as reported" is false. Big difference. You can nitpick part of the story and say that even if the rest is true.
So the liberal media printed a story that was at least in part, False?
Shocking
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:43 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
He said that the story "as reported" is false. Big difference. You can nitpick part of the story and say that even if the rest
Lol.
The story they reported is false. Yet somehow something is true?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:44 pm to mmcgrath
You are a fricking idiot
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:45 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
He said that the story "as reported" is false. Big difference. You can nitpick part of the story and say that even if the rest is true.
The rest of what?Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:47 pm to a want
quote:
I don't believe a word he says
Yeah, we know.
We heard you the first 100,000x.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:47 pm to Scruffy
quote:quote:
The didn't disclose "military operations" and did not discuss intel "sources" or "methods".
Doesn't counter the Washington Post story really.
What was disclosed then?
If none of that was disclosed, what was disclosed?
Trump relayed details of a specific plot, including the name of a specific city where it was discovered. He didn't say that country A discovered the info using method B, but disclosed enough details to potentially narrow it down.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:49 pm to mmcgrath
How in the frick do you even know this?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:53 pm to Magician2
Anonymous sources,I would guess.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:56 pm to Magician2
buzzfeed, DU and media matters talking points told him
go look at the original thread on this supposed bombshell fake news. people come out of the woodworks piling on.
they are so fricking s t u p i d. yes, stupid! in their butthurt hatred. there are protocols in place that if a (never been in government POTUS--especially) has such a meeting, the conversation is controlled. Many POTUS' have the gift of gab and are monitored by a McMasters type.
this is as fake as Trump removed the MLK statue from the oval.
go look at the original thread on this supposed bombshell fake news. people come out of the woodworks piling on.
they are so fricking s t u p i d. yes, stupid! in their butthurt hatred. there are protocols in place that if a (never been in government POTUS--especially) has such a meeting, the conversation is controlled. Many POTUS' have the gift of gab and are monitored by a McMasters type.
this is as fake as Trump removed the MLK statue from the oval.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 6:58 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Doesn't counter the Washington Post story really.
You're right, it doesn't. This could just be wordplay and trying to skate by on semantics.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News