- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: My experience with Executive Orders
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
On this board? In my experience, a decent # of threads on here have something to do with fox news.
1
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:06 pm to TheOcean
quote:
On this board? In my experience, a decent # of threads on here have something to do with fox news.
I'd estimate 90% of FOX news references here (and other boards I visit) come from lefits. Do you people really think that's the primary source of news for everyone on the right?
I see Drudge mentioned far more than I see FOX referenced by the right.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:08 pm to TupeloTiger
I thought senate terms were 6 years. Did you get appointed, win a special election? Or am wrong, it will not be the first time? 
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:11 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Do you people really think that's the primary source of news for everyone on the right?
For probably 50% of the posters on THIS board? No doubt about it. I would love to see the % of how many fox news viewers are from LA.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:15 pm to dante
quote:State Senate
I thought senate terms were 6 years
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:18 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:2nd upvote today
About 8% of Americans cite FOX as their mains source of news. I think you folks have picked a false boogeyman.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:20 pm to TheOcean
Wow Fox News owns some real estate in your head.
I find it funny for anyone to dismiss anyone for whatever news source they use. It tells me they are scared to debate facts and simply write others off. This goes both ways on each side. It tells me all I need to know about a poster when they categorically dismiss others based on their usual viewing news channel. This includes msnbc or any other news source.
I find it funny for anyone to dismiss anyone for whatever news source they use. It tells me they are scared to debate facts and simply write others off. This goes both ways on each side. It tells me all I need to know about a poster when they categorically dismiss others based on their usual viewing news channel. This includes msnbc or any other news source.
This post was edited on 2/17/14 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I think you folks have picked a false boogeyman.
Robert Ailes would fap furiously if he saw this board. I think you underestimate how many posters on here religiously follow fox news.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:22 pm to Elcid96
quote:
simply write others off
I wrote you off after your incoherent ramble on page 1. You mad?
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:24 pm to TheOcean
Hahahaha about you!!! You can't be serious CLARK!! You are a typical arse clown as I just touched on!! Real estate in your head must be cheap!!!
You are Exhibit A
You are Exhibit A
This post was edited on 2/17/14 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:24 pm to Elcid96
i agree that fox news will likely be dead as it exists today in 30 years.
TV as it exists now will be likely dead, the concept of cable will certainly be dead. Thus fox news will be dead. People are already selecting to watch what they want, when they want to watch it, the model of broadcast is already out of date and will only deterioate.
to the OP, what specific obama EOs are problematic? My experience with EOs is the other side hates them (for good reason) when the opponent is president, and defends them when their guy is running the show.
TV as it exists now will be likely dead, the concept of cable will certainly be dead. Thus fox news will be dead. People are already selecting to watch what they want, when they want to watch it, the model of broadcast is already out of date and will only deterioate.
to the OP, what specific obama EOs are problematic? My experience with EOs is the other side hates them (for good reason) when the opponent is president, and defends them when their guy is running the show.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:25 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
to the OP, what specific obama EOs are problematic?
The world will never know
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:27 pm to TheOcean
Many of Obama's EO's are legal.
Him using EO to pick and choose what parts of the ACA are implemented is unconstitutional. You can't change or alter a law by EO.
Him using EO to pick and choose what parts of the ACA are implemented is unconstitutional. You can't change or alter a law by EO.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:31 pm to TheOcean
quote:Please include the WSJ, Charles Krauthammer, George Will, Drudge, Rush, Coulter, and even Paglia.
Robert Ailes would fap furiously if he saw this board
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:32 pm to deltaland
quote:
Him using EO to pick and choose what parts of the ACA are implemented is unconstitutional.
the executive always has had wide leeway on the implementation of laws.
If its truly illegal, I would suggest lodging a lawsuit. If its illegal, the courts will likely rule in your favor.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:33 pm to Hawkeye95
There are already many lawsuits begin filed against Obama and the Gov't for the way they are implementing the law.
And the judges likely won't rule in their favor, due to Reid implementing the nuclear option so now Obama can appoint judges that fit his agenda.
And the judges likely won't rule in their favor, due to Reid implementing the nuclear option so now Obama can appoint judges that fit his agenda.
This post was edited on 2/17/14 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:35 pm to deltaland
I never watch Fox News. I dont even have it on my crappy cable package. Its funny how leftists love to throw out Fox News as some kind of Pied Piper to conservatives when that line itself is a talking point itself put out there by the left.
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:37 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Obama isn't doing anything that hasn't been done.
This defense isn't even suitable for a toddler to use, why should we allow politicians to use it?
Posted on 2/17/14 at 7:42 pm to deltaland
quote:
There are already many lawsuits begin filed against Obama and the Gov't for the way they are implementing the law.
And the judges likely won't rule in their favor, due to Reid implementing the nuclear option so now Obama can appoint judges that fit his agenda.
great, and then.......you have no clue what you are talking about. Federal judges are for life. For a reason. So they can take on the executive branch.
and the current judicial branch is 50-50 dems/reps, with the SCOTUS being 5-4 republicans (although there are a few liberal republicans on the bench).
Go put the tinfoil back on your head.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News