- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mueller’s Indictment Of Russian Company Is Facing Dismissal Over Legal Incompetence
Posted on 5/15/18 at 7:26 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Posted on 5/15/18 at 7:26 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:
Still looking for details to verify. My guess is Concord Catering is on a campaign finance report.
EPICMELT
P
I
C
M
E
L
T
Posted on 5/15/18 at 7:28 pm to teke184
quote:
If the messes with Whitey Bulger and Professor Stephen Hatfill didn’t get this idiot sent off into the cornfield, nothing will.
You can say that again. If Mueller wasn't a complete hack for the Deep State, his legal career would be in shambles and in disgrace. Bob Mueller has done more to discredit the good name of the US Dept of Justice than almost any other man alive today.
Posted on 7/17/18 at 5:30 am to GumboPot
Are we still doubting the existence of Concord Catering?
Posted on 7/17/18 at 5:36 am to GumboPot
quote:
and fire the entire team that managed this indictment for blinding incompetence
Not blinding incompetence. Criminal abuse of the grand jury system.
Posted on 7/17/18 at 5:46 am to GumboPot
$100 says that this “reporter” is not an attorney.
Posted on 7/17/18 at 5:51 am to AggieHank86
Another $100 says no one caught Putin’s statement yesterday validating the existence of this “restaurant business” as he put it.
This post was edited on 7/17/18 at 5:54 am
Posted on 7/17/18 at 5:53 am to GumboPot
quote:Far from incompetence, it is legal audacity.
Mueller’s Indictment Of Russian Company Is Facing Dismissal Over Legal Incompetence
Mueller: "As were ruining the lives of every Trump associate we can, we'd better attach some actual Russians to the thing to make it look legit."
Andrew Weissmann: "Okay. How about this company? Obviously we have no case, but they'll never come stateside to defend it, so no one will be the wiser."
Mueller: "Perfect! We're in the clear! Now go break into Manifort's home and feel up his wife in front of him."
This post was edited on 7/17/18 at 5:54 am
Posted on 7/17/18 at 5:57 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
quote:With Chris Wallace?
Another $100 says no one caught Putin’s statement yesterday validating the existence of this “restaurant business” as he put it.
I did.
Send that $100 to St.Jude's will you. It's one of my favorite charities.
Posted on 7/17/18 at 6:04 am to GumboPot
quote:Which BTW is EXACTLY what Andrew Weismann did to Arthur Andersen and it's Execs, shutting down a huge national accounting firm, costing thousands their jobs, and jailing innocent men in the process. All until SCOTUS ruled 9-0 against him in the appeal.
In other words, Concord Management is arguing that Mueller and his army of attorneys charged Concord Management (and other Russian entities) with a vague-sounding “crime” that isn’t actually a crime.
Posted on 7/17/18 at 6:05 am to GumboPot
quote:
Robert Mueller’s crack team
Posted on 7/17/18 at 6:06 am to AggieHank86
quote:
$100 says that this “reporter” is not an attorney.
Yes, because only attorneys know how to read.
Posted on 7/17/18 at 7:38 am to starsandstripes
A clear sign it was a bullshite case, they told the judge they were not prepared???? WTF you brought the case and you arent prepared.
THEN they whipped out the ole never failed, "Classified Information", if that doesnt work they will use the tried and true "It will force us to divulge interview techniques".
WTF can be classified about it? Did they buy an expensive conference room table?
THEN they whipped out the ole never failed, "Classified Information", if that doesnt work they will use the tried and true "It will force us to divulge interview techniques".
WTF can be classified about it? Did they buy an expensive conference room table?
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:31 am to starsandstripes
quote:”Reading” and “understanding” are clearly quite distinct issues.quote:Yes, because only attorneys know how to read.
$100 says that this “reporter” is not an attorney.
This post was edited on 7/17/18 at 9:35 am
Popular
Back to top


0






