- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mueller is lying about Russia and Wikileaks. NSA FOIA request could prove he is lying.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:56 am
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:56 am
Here’s what Binney says:
“Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange.
And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them.
That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in?—?copying communications between people and devices.”
If Binney is interpreting this correctly?—?and bear in mind that, not only is he extraordinarily bright, but he is sometimes referred to as “the father of the NSA”?—?this provides strong support for the hypothesis that Seth was indeed Wikileaks’ source for the DNC emails it published. Assange has strongly hinted at this, Sy Hersh claims to have a trusted informant inside the FBI who states that he has seen FBI documents verifying this, and Binney himself says that he has two sources inside the intel community vouching for this.
Above is quoted from this article: Read more.
“Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange.
And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them.
That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in?—?copying communications between people and devices.”
If Binney is interpreting this correctly?—?and bear in mind that, not only is he extraordinarily bright, but he is sometimes referred to as “the father of the NSA”?—?this provides strong support for the hypothesis that Seth was indeed Wikileaks’ source for the DNC emails it published. Assange has strongly hinted at this, Sy Hersh claims to have a trusted informant inside the FBI who states that he has seen FBI documents verifying this, and Binney himself says that he has two sources inside the intel community vouching for this.
Above is quoted from this article: Read more.
6
Posted on 4/20/19 at 7:59 am to GumboPot
This strains credulity.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:01 am to GumboPot
The only “proof” we have of Russia hacking the DNC is Crowdstrike and the DNC’s word.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:01 am to GumboPot
I believe you are correct. I just hope it all comes out very soon as the dems will impeach but not remove Trump before it all comes out.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:02 am to GumboPot
quote:
claims to have a trusted informant inside the FBI who states that he has seen FBI documents verifying this,
In other words....
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:02 am to baybeefeetz
Because their is so much evidence that points to the fact that the DNC servers were hacked from the inside and not the outside.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:04 am to Deuces
quote:
DNC’s word.
Donna Brazile on The Five yesterday said the DNC gave a "replica" copy of their records to the FBI, not the original copy. Watters liked to have fallen out of his chair laughing.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:06 am to baybeefeetz
So does the servers never examined by LE.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:07 am to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
5/4/2019 
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:09 am to Deuces
quote:
The only “proof” we have of Russia hacking the DNC is Crowdstrike and the DNC’s word.
That is a factual statement.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:11 am to Homesick Tiger
Brazille is not that bright...and half as honest. She plays the 'nice lady'/Christian card to keep the truth dogs at bay...but it won't fly with the like of Waters, Bongino and Guttfeld.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:11 am to GumboPot
Do you realize how explosive this is and how many people could profit from bellowing this up? It would absolutely be a huge story by now.
The 32 pages are not necessarily communications between Assange and Rich. This is a huge leap. Enormous.
And because Inalways have to add... I would love it to be true. I am biased toward the fantastical.
The 32 pages are not necessarily communications between Assange and Rich. This is a huge leap. Enormous.
And because Inalways have to add... I would love it to be true. I am biased toward the fantastical.
This post was edited on 4/20/19 at 8:12 am
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:12 am to Jbird
The article time stamp is 04/19/19. What is the 05/04/19 date in reference to?
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:12 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
This strains credulity.
No it doesn't.
To trust what the C.I.A., D.I.A, or N.S.A. says or does is foolish. They are in the LIE BUSINESS.
"Our" government has many secrets and "We" will never be told most of them.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:14 am to GumboPot
That loon Lickacomeyhetastesgood dropped a few dates like that insinuating Drumpf or junior would perp walk.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:17 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
And because Inalways have to add... I would love it to be true. I am biased toward the fantastical.
Russians hacking from the outside is fantastical.
Seth Rich, as an DNC IT Bernie supporter, is a lot more Occam’s Razor-ish.
This post was edited on 4/20/19 at 8:20 am
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:30 am to GumboPot
Assange has strongly implied that Rich was the source but has never directly stated it. He ducks the question with the old "We've never revealed a source" shtick but extending that beyond death doesn't make much sense unless he's diverting attention from someone else. Especially considering that if he was the source it seems so very likely that he was murdered over the leak. It's conceivable that he was the leaker and shortly afterwards fell victim to a random non-robbery mugging but just barely conceivable. Still, all in all Assange has been a little too coy about it.
Posted on 4/20/19 at 8:46 am to GumboPot
Here is the truth.
1- Russia did try to hack the DNC. They try to hack everybody. So do we.
2- Seth Rich did communicate with Assange and had files.
Due to the fact that Russia attempted and left "finger prints" Crowdstrike could easily lie about what happened.
1- Russia did try to hack the DNC. They try to hack everybody. So do we.
2- Seth Rich did communicate with Assange and had files.
Due to the fact that Russia attempted and left "finger prints" Crowdstrike could easily lie about what happened.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News