- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Morehouse Parish AEOY bitches....
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:02 pm
Earlier, in 2016, in Morehouse Parish we had a couple white boys murder a Pit Bull on Snapchat by cutting its throat.
Over 20,000 letters were sent to the Court that demanded action be taken harshly against these coward bitches. The judge 2released that information to the public but did not sentence them to any type of harsh punishment or jail time. Local area was up in arms as to why he let them go with a slap on the wrist.
Fast forward to today. Three black men are being faced with almost the exact crime by filming the murder of a dog on snapchat.
Precedent having being set already in Morehouse, two of these men should receive a fine, and jail time and/or community service hard labor halted with probation as the sentencing, correct?
The argument as insane as it is, for the two thug white trash fricks that slit the dogs throat in 2016 was that it is legal to kill a dangerous animal. Laws are so god damn vague and tyrannical no wonder we pick and choose our justice. They also claimed the pit bull belonged to no one either.
Ill post two links to the 2016 slaying and also the recent one today.
arrest and snapchat of abuse and killing in 2016
sentencing in 2018
LINK to recent story
This will interesting to follow over the next few months.
Over 20,000 letters were sent to the Court that demanded action be taken harshly against these coward bitches. The judge 2released that information to the public but did not sentence them to any type of harsh punishment or jail time. Local area was up in arms as to why he let them go with a slap on the wrist.
Fast forward to today. Three black men are being faced with almost the exact crime by filming the murder of a dog on snapchat.
Precedent having being set already in Morehouse, two of these men should receive a fine, and jail time and/or community service hard labor halted with probation as the sentencing, correct?
The argument as insane as it is, for the two thug white trash fricks that slit the dogs throat in 2016 was that it is legal to kill a dangerous animal. Laws are so god damn vague and tyrannical no wonder we pick and choose our justice. They also claimed the pit bull belonged to no one either.
Ill post two links to the 2016 slaying and also the recent one today.
arrest and snapchat of abuse and killing in 2016
sentencing in 2018
LINK to recent story
This will interesting to follow over the next few months.
10
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:03 pm to reo45
nb4trumpsfault
Should be cheered no matter when it happens
quote:
murder a Pit Bull
Should be cheered no matter when it happens
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:04 pm to reo45
What part am I supposed to be outraged about? TIA
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:09 pm to reo45
quote:
Earlier, in 2016, in Morehouse Parish we had a couple white boys murder a Pit Bull on Snapchat by cutting its throat.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:12 pm to reo45
You cannot murder an animal. Your wording bears false emotional connotations. They killed a pit bull.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:22 pm to Rougarou13
Hahahaha... damn this board is tough 
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:24 pm to reo45
You're obviously insinuating that the white guys got a lesser sentence than the black guys will for the same crime, as some sort of race-baiting BS.
Did you note that the judge who sentenced the white guys is Carl Sharp, who is black? I mean, his name is in one of the stories you linked to.
That seems like an important fact to me when you're playing the whitey-gets-treated-better-than-black-criminals-by-the-system game.
Did you note that the judge who sentenced the white guys is Carl Sharp, who is black? I mean, his name is in one of the stories you linked to.
That seems like an important fact to me when you're playing the whitey-gets-treated-better-than-black-criminals-by-the-system game.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:30 pm to reo45
quote:
Niger Madison, age 20; Alontae Alford, age 21; and Tobias Conway, age 28, are being held in the Morehouse Parish Jail following a grand jury indictment.
at least 25 bans.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:42 pm to reo45
At least be honest.
The white boys plead guilty to animal cruelty fined, on probation, community service, submit to psych evaluations, and have jail time over their heads if they frick up more.
Similar crime, different circumstances.
quote:
Niger Madison, age 20; Alontae Alford, age 21; and Tobias Conway, age 28, are being held in the Morehouse Parish Jail following a grand jury indictment. Madison and Alford are accused of aggravated cruelty to an animal, and Conway is facing one count of illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
The white boys plead guilty to animal cruelty fined, on probation, community service, submit to psych evaluations, and have jail time over their heads if they frick up more.
Similar crime, different circumstances.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:45 pm to ZappBrannigan
quote:
The white boys plead guilty to animal cruelty fined, on probation, community service, submit to psych evaluations, and have jail time over their heads if they frick up more.
Similar crime, different circumstances.
And the white guys were sentenced by a judge who is black.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:05 pm to reo45
At minimum, they all need a psychological examination. That kind of brutality at a young age is worrisome. These are the types that shouldn’t have easy access to firearms among other weapons.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:07 pm to Btrtigerfan
quote:One could argue that owning pit bulls is more anti-social behavior than killing pit bulls.
At minimum, they all need a psychological examination. That kind of brutality at a young age is worrisome. These are the types that shouldn’t have easy access to firearms among other weapons.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:14 pm to reo45
What would've happened had they done the same to a coyote, deer, hog, snake, etc?
Why are there different laws for different animals?
As long as it wasn't the property of another person, this should not be illegal.
Why are there different laws for different animals?
As long as it wasn't the property of another person, this should not be illegal.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:15 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:And if anything, for pit bulls, it should be promoted.
As long as it wasn't the property of another person, this should not be illegal.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:18 pm to Big Scrub TX
I don't want to get into the pit bull hate, because it obscures the point.
But animals are property or wild. They have no rights and deserve no protections.
It is a completely hypocritical stance to approve of the meat and animal products industry, while advocating protective standards against supposed domesticated animals.
But animals are property or wild. They have no rights and deserve no protections.
It is a completely hypocritical stance to approve of the meat and animal products industry, while advocating protective standards against supposed domesticated animals.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:26 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:Yeah. I meant to say I agree with all of that. It just happens to be a bonus that it was a pit bull.
But animals are property or wild. They have no rights and deserve no protections.
It is a completely hypocritical stance to approve of the meat and animal products industry, while advocating protective standards against supposed domesticated animals.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:32 pm to Floating Change Up
We got white guys named alontae and niger?
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:42 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
I don't want to get into the pit bull hate, because it obscures the point. But animals are property or wild. They have no rights and deserve no protections. It is a completely hypocritical stance to approve of the meat and animal products industry, while advocating protective standards against supposed domesticated animals.
There is a difference between wild animals and domesticated animals. And, by the way, it is illegal to kill wild game animals (nuisance ones notwithstanding) and then to not use the meat. It's called wanton waste.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:55 pm to sparkinator
quote:What's the actual difference?
There is a difference between wild animals and domesticated animals.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 3:17 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
What's the actual difference?
Are you just being obtuse?
Just for starters, and painting with a broad brush. Domesticated animals have lost their fear of people and depend upon people for their existence. Wild animals use their 'instinct' more and fend for themselves. Have you ever heard of animals going 'feral.' Once domesticated animals that resort back to self-sufficiency by 'going wild.'
I think killing a domesticated, dependent animal, just to kill it, is wrong.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News